"Global Warming is rubbish"

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
The web survey was over 3146 scientists out of 10,257 who were sent the survey. The fact you can't even grasp the actual facts is hilarious. You are a psycho.

"Statistics"

Um, 79 climate scientists responded.

Idiot.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
AK, You have not cast any doubts. AK You're opinion is purely conspiratorial. Not a single person on this site can read a scientifically reviewed research paper on climate change and understand it. Not even you but you pass it off as fact. Your case that 97% agree therefore it's real is hilarious. Real life nut jobs on this site. You are really getting crushed in this thread AK. I am starting to feel a little sorry for you.

I guess I'll side with the 97%. Have fun with the Sheriff Joe's and Acebb's of this world. Sound like real winners, lol.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
"Statistics"

Um, 79 climate scientists responded.

Idiot.

No, 79 of the 3,146 who responded were climate scientists who produce over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change. The fact you guys are having such a hard time grasping a simple survey is absolutely hilarious.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
I guess I'll side with the 97%.

The problem is there is no "97%"

LOL

98_percent_climate_scientists_graph.png
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
"Statistics"

Um, 79 climate scientists responded.

Idiot.

basking in the glow of 79 people (out of 20,000) who agree with him.

"statistically significant"

"scientific consensus"

:Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada:

There's no cure for ideology.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
basking in the glow of 79 people (out of 20,000) who agree with him.

"statistically significant"

"scientific consensus"

:Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada::Carcajada:

There's no cure for ideology.

Yes, 75/77 climatologist who produce over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change agree with me. What a bummer, lol.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The problem is there is no "97%"

LOL

The fact you are comparing the amount of climatologists within that population to the 97% figure they are using is astounding. You are dumber than I possibly imagined, lol.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
What are you even talking about? Lmao! Whenever you get caught in a corner you just start making up random shit. What I meant was when you see Gallup say 60% of people disapprove of Obama, they are using a smaller sample size in comparison than this survey of climatologists. It really should not be that hard, but you make things very hard, lol.
There it is!

I+didn't+say+that.jpg
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
Yes, 75/77 climatologist who produce over 50% of their peer reviewed research papers on climate change agree with me. What a bummer, lol.

While the other 19,923 sane scientists saw your little game for what it was (a political survey) and did this:

:bigfinger

"statistically significant"

"scientific consensus"


Every day you prove how uneducated and dumb you are.

Every. Single. Day.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
the earth has been undergoing climate change for 2 billion years, no dispute there (note, man is not responsible for this)

the earth has been warming for about 17,000 years now, the combustion engine has been here for a significantly insignificant period of that time frame

three of the hottest years on earth occurred from 2000 - 2010. That also happened 1930 - 1940, essentially making that stat irrelevant (lest one can explain the 60 year gap)

NASA has said there's no significant / measurable increase in the earth's temperature since 1997. (oh gee, let's just ignore that one. Or maybe we'll change the name to man-made climate change)

Man made global warming scientists have admittedly committed fraud when releasing their findings (why would they have to do that?)

That same scientific community was predicting global cooling in the 1970's (they must have been right too)

None of the dire predictions global warming scientists predicted have come to fruition (I'm talking about the one's who's time lines have already passed of course)

When the science community can tell us why the earth has been warning in 20,000 year cycles and then cooling in 70,000 cycles (about 22,000 such cycles) over the last 2 billion years, then I'll listen. If they can tell us why the next cooling cycle who's time is coming will not happen, then I'll listen.

Solar flares and volcanic eruptions impact our climate and temperatures infinitely more than mankind has. This man-made global warming, which they've conveniently changed to man-made climate change since warming as stopped, is all about "liberals", yes "liberals" including liberal scientists who naively believe they can control the climate. Too fucking funny.





PS: pay no mind to me, I'm a stupid racist that gets everything wrong :) fucking losers :)
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
I guess I'll side with the 97%. Have fun with the Sheriff Joe's and Acebb's of this world. Sound like real winners lol.
see I know that makes you feel clever but sorry to spoil your parade. Joe and Ace happen to agree with me, and I them, using logic on this subject. I can't speak for them, but I have no agenda here. I ain't gonna tow any party line on a variety of separate topics including this one. Can you honestly say the same? Key word being honestly? Re the 97% (yawm) ... you continue to claim that those who disagree with the 97% are intellectually inferior to you. You should definitely rethink that and look throughout history at all the wonderful things told to us that were not (clearing throat) all that accurate. I am sure you can name 10 without hardly thinking.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Provide proof of this claim.

Go ahead.

I dare you.

Lol, that's easy.

I'm using 120,000,000 as voters just off the top of my head

1500/120,000,000 = .00125%

Now I don't know how many climatologists who produce 50% of their research papers there are but I can safely bet that there are not 6,320,000... which there would have to be to equate to the Rasmussen poll.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
While the other 19,923 sane scientists saw your little game for what it was (a political survey) and did this:

:bigfinger

"statistically significant"

"scientific consensus"


Every day you prove how uneducated and dumb you are.

Every. Single. Day.

You are very dumb, lmao!!!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
see I know that makes you feel clever but sorry to spoil your parade. Joe and Ace happen to agree with me, and I them, using logic on this subject. I can't speak for them, but I have no agenda here. I ain't gonna tow any party line on a variety of separate topics including this one. Can you honestly say the same? Key word being honestly? Re the 97% (yawm) ... you continue to claim that those who disagree with the 97% are intellectually inferior to you. You should definitely rethink that and look throughout history at all the wonderful things told to us that were not (clearing throat) all that accurate. I am sure you can name 10 without hardly thinking.

You're opinion on global warming is literally the dumbest one I've heard. You're just using a logical fallacy and claiming it's not real because you don't think it's real. No facts, no logic... nothing. Just your opinion. Sorry bud, but your opinion is meaningless.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
You're opinion on global warming is literally the dumbest one I've heard. You're just using a logical fallacy and claiming it's not real because you don't think it's real. No facts, no logic... nothing. Just your opinion. Sorry bud, but your opinion is meaningless.

No your ideology is.

And your "web surveys" are even more meaningless, OFER Akphagdelt.

http://www.debate.org/akphidelt/

Debate Statistics
Debates:3
Lost:3
Tied:
Won:
Win Ratio:0.00%
Percentile:66.97%
Elo Ranking:1,761
Statistics based on completed debates.


Was climate fraud one of the debates where you got kicked in the teeth?

Did calling people "stupid" and "dumb" help you score points on substance?

lmfao!

Loser!@#0
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
You're opinion on global warming is literally the dumbest one I've heard. You're just using a logical fallacy and claiming it's not real because you don't think it's real. No facts, no logic... nothing. Just your opinion. Sorry bud, but your opinion is meaningless.
It makes absolutely no sense. Sorry bud. Yes I know, my facts are opinion and only your 'facts' and indeed facts. How am I doing? I have destroyed you enough for today.

And think about the question I asked in my previous post. Ya the one about all the things that have been told to us over the decades that turned out to be lies. There are some HUGE ones in there. HUGE! This is simply another one.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
It makes absolutely no sense. Sorry bud. Yes I know, my facts are opinion and only your 'facts' and indeed facts. How am I doing? I have destroyed you enough for today. And think about the question I asked in my previous post. Ya the one about all the thing that have been told to us over the decades that turned of to be lies. There are some HUGE ones in there. HUGE! This is simply another one.

No my facts are that people who study climatology say it's real. Your facts are that you don't believe the people who say it's real. I'm sorry but, I'm siding with the smart people on this one. You guys don't seem very intelligent and definitely people that should not be telling others whether man made climate change is real or not.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
the prepubescent troll posts a political survey and calls it "scientific consensus" and "statistically significant" lmao

No facts.

No data.

Just politicized opinions (a paltry 79 people out of 20,000)

Just like "93% of economists agree the stimulus was a huge success!" -- white is black, and black is white in fratfraud's world.

There's simply no cure for ideology.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,949
Messages
13,575,546
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com