"Global Warming is rubbish"

[akphidelt]

It is a different statement entirely.

Idiot.

How is it a different statement? lmao. So putting on the "the last 5 years" changes the statement?

 

[Acebb]

That's a greater sample size of climate scientists than most polls from gallup, rasmussen, etc. Very statistically relevant.

A hysterical lie which you will pretend you never said.

Gallup surveys over 1,000 people

Raz has 1,500 Likely Voters

You're a joke.

 

[akphidelt]

Yes Acebb, 100 scientists out of 20,000 is "statistically significant"

And the clown show continues...

This is how dumb people think... lol. Acebb and Sheriff Joe talking about statistics. I'm sure many high school teachers would love a 2nd chance with you guys. Because they clearly failed.

 

[akphidelt]

A hysterical lie which you will pretend you never said.

Gallup surveys over 1,000 people

Raz has 1,500 Likely Voters

You're a joke.

Lmao. You honestly have no fucking clue how statistics works, hahahaha!! Just pure comedy gold.

 

[Acebb]

That's a greater sample size of climate scientists than most polls from gallup, rasmussen, etc. Very statistically relevant.

One of the most idiotic lies this dumbass has ever typed here.

 

[Acebb]

Lmao. You honestly have no fucking clue how statistics works, hahahaha!! Just pure comedy gold.

As I said clown, you will pretend you never said that moronic lie.

 

[Acebb]

Lmao. You honestly have no fucking clue how statistics works, hahahaha!! Just pure comedy gold.

Um

LMAO

1,500 > 79

LOL

IDIOT

 

[Acebb]

This is how dumb people think... lol. Acebb and Sheriff Joe talking about statistics. I'm sure many high school teachers would love a 2nd chance with you guys. Because they clearly failed.

You are under the laughable impression you understand statistics.

You don't

Just as you can't read.

 

[Acebb]

Yes Acebb, 100 scientists out of 20,000 is "statistically significant"

And the clown show continues...

Right.

And what to guess why it is "statistically significant"

Because a documented liar and abject imbecile says so.

That's why.

 

[akphidelt]

Um

LMAO

1,500 > 79

LOL

IDIOT

Hahaha, sorry I should have realized you didn't understand what I was talking about. I was referring to the sample size in relation to the population. Thought it would be implied, but I realize I'm dealing with a real life loser.

 

[Acebb]

Hahaha, sorry I should have realized you didn't understand what I was talking about. I was referring to the sample size in relation to the population. Thought it would be implied, but I realize I'm dealing with a real life loser.

;+)-

The fact that you think this is either true or responsive is quite funny.

 

[akphidelt]

You are under the laughable impression you understand statistics.

You don't

Just as you can't read.

I understand statistics fine. It's clear you and Sheriff Joe don't though. But I'm not surprised, lol. You guys are dumb.

 

[SheriffJoe]

This is how dumb people think... lol. Acebb and Sheriff Joe talking about statistics. I'm sure many high school teachers would love a 2nd chance with you guys. Because they clearly failed.

Everyone here has been called an idiot or dumb at one time or another. The difference between you and everyone else is, you go out and prove it every single day.

bogus web survey of 100 people (out of 20,000) = "scientific consensus" and "statistically significant"

And climate frauds wonder why they are losing this debate. face)(*^%

 

[akphidelt]

;+)-

The fact that you think this is either true or responsive is quite funny.

The fact you don't think it's true or responsive is quite funny. Lol.

 

[Acebb]

Hahaha, sorry I should have realized you didn't understand what I was talking about. I was referring to the sample size in relation to the population. Thought it would be implied, but I realize I'm dealing with a real life loser.

By the way, you rank idiot, you are on record here defending the low # of responses as "statistics"

Now you're sputtering meaningless words because you got exposed, yet again, saying something comically dumb.

 

[Acebb]

The fact you don't think it's true or responsive is quite funny. Lol.

Note: You were bragging about how many people the survey went out to.

Now you've been reduced to making a laughably untrue claim about "sample size in relation to the population."

You have no idea what "the population" of climate scientists is.

You're just typing dumb bullshit.

 

[scottcarter]

You have not cast any doubts. You're opinion is purely conspiratorial. Not a single person on this site can read a scientifically reviewed research paper on climate change and understand it. Your case that 3% disagree therefore it's not real is hilarious. Real life nut jobs on this site.

AK, You have not cast any doubts. AK You're opinion is purely conspiratorial. Not a single person on this site can read a scientifically reviewed research paper on climate change and understand it. Not even you but you pass it off as fact. Your case that 97% agree therefore it's real is hilarious. Real life nut jobs on this site. You are really getting crushed in this thread AK. I am starting to feel a little sorry for you.

 

[Acebb]

I understand statistics fine.

No you don't.

Which is why you were so busy defending the low response rate and now you're comically claiming it was a high response rate.

You're total fucking moron.

 

[akphidelt]

Everyone here has been called an idiot or dumb at one time or another. The difference between you and everyone else is, you go out and prove it every single day.

bogus web survey of 100 people (out of 20,000) = "scientific consensus" and "statistically significant"

And climate frauds wonder why they are losing this debate. face)(*^%

The web survey was over 3146 scientists out of 10,257 who were sent the survey. The fact you can't even grasp the actual facts is hilarious. You are a psycho.

 

[akphidelt]

No you don't.

Which is why you were so busy defending the low response rate and now you're comically claiming it was a high response rate.

You're total fucking moron.

I'm not even talking about response rate, lol. That's how dumb you are, hahahahaha!!