FYI - CNN reports Supreme Court refuses to hear BC Case.

Search

bushman
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
14,457
Tokens
What I'm really interested in is having a laff at the expense of the President, especially since the chances that he's going to actually make a difference to anything are relatively slim.

Sooty or Barak Obama...doesn't matter really
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,123
Tokens
<TABLE cellSpacing=20 width=600><TBODY><TR><TD style="COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: georgia,times,times new roman,serif" align=middle colSpan=2>FedEx Members of
The Electoral College

Last chance to lobby for
constitutional eligibility standard


</TD></TR><TR><TD style="FONT-SIZE: 17px; FONT-FAMILY: arial, helvetica, sans-serif" vAlign=top align=left colSpan=2>Despite receiving more than 60,000 of our letters last week, the U.S. Supreme Court announced on Monday that it had refused to review one of the cases challenging the President-elect's eligibility to hold that office.
"That leaves it up to the Electoral College," says WND Editor Joseph Farah. "If you want to do everything you can, like I do, to see that the letter and spirit of the Constitution are upheld in this election year, this may be your last chance to weigh in before Inauguration Day. I urge you to work with us in sending letters to members of the Electoral College."
<TABLE style="MARGIN-LEFT: 15px" cellPadding=0 align=right><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Here's Our Next Move:
Following up the campaign last week to FedEx the U.S. Supreme Court, WND today announces a historic first in its quest to establish Barack Obama's eligibility for office - a similar FedEx letter drive directed at individual Electoral College members.
Through Thursday at noon Eastern, WND is providing an opportunity to Americans who would like to contact electors of the next president before they vote Monday to send Obama to the White House.
WND has obtained addresses for more than 87 percent of the 538-member Electoral College. The letters will be sent FedEx to the 470 members for whom addresses are available. They will all be delivered Friday morning, giving each elector the weekend to consider the constitutional issues raised by Obama's presidency.
With the new "FedEx the Electoral College" program, you can reach all 470 with a one-page pre-written letter, with your name and address attached, delivered overnight for less than it would cost you to FedEx one member - if you had the address.
"The idea was to make this very easy and inexpensive for Americans to make their voices heard," explained Farah. "We encourage other creative ways to prevail upon the consciences of the Electoral College members, but these are not high-profile, public figures. They are ordinary Americans who are little known to the public and who lead private lives. It is not easy to find their names, let alone addresses. While we do not feel comfortable making those addresses public, we believe this campaign will allow Americans to offer their opinions and concerns in a controlled way, without violating the privacy of individual members."
Farah personally drafted the letter that will be sent to the Electoral College members above the name and address of all those participating in the program. The letters sent in the "FedEx the Electoral College" campaign will read:

<TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=30 width=510 align=center bgColor=#000><TBODY><TR><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 30px; PADDING-LEFT: 30px; FONT-SIZE: 16px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 30px; PADDING-TOP: 30px; FONT-FAMILY: georgia; times: ; serif: " align=left bgColor=#ffffff>Electoral College Member
123 Main Street
Anytown, PA 12345

Dear member of the Electoral College:
Before you cast your vote Monday to make Barack Hussein Obama Jr. the next president of the United States, please seriously consider the following:
Right now, a dozen lawsuits are pending all over the United States - including one brought by a former presidential candidate and U.N. ambassador, and another suit brought by a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania, plus there are many others - all attempting to bring clarity to an issue that will haunt an Obama presidency if it isn't dealt with now.
That issue, as you surely know, is the fact that the U.S. Constitution says clearly and unambiguously in Article 2, Section 1 that presidents must be natural born citizens. But, as is evident not only from lawsuits, but from news stories and the actions of millions of Americans signing petitions, this constitutional issue has not yet been addressed, even at this late hour.
Unfortunately, there isn't enough time for our slow-moving legal process to deal with this before the Electoral College meets next week. Only you, our Electors, have the power and responsibility - and the obligation under the Constitution - to use your authority to establish, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. qualifies for the office under that standard.
There is grave and widespread concern throughout the American public that this constitutional requirement is being overlooked and enforcement neglected by state and federal election authorities. There should be no doubt whatsoever that America's next president was truly born in the United States.
Remember, if the Constitution doesn't mean precisely what it says, then America is no longer a nation under the rule of law. And a nation no longer under the rule of law is, by definition, under the rule of men.
Therefore I urge you to honor the Constitution in this matter and uphold the public trust - even if doing so may prove awkward or inconvenient.
All Americans should have confidence their president is eligible to serve. In this unique and historic case, you may prove to be the Constitution's last line of defense.
Sincerely,
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>The name and address of every participant in the "FedEx the Electoral College" campaign will be displayed for the 470 Electoral College members who receive the letters.
This is an historic opportunity to speak directly to the Electoral College at a critical time in American history.

Sign me up! I want to send my FedEx message to the Electoral College right now for only $10.95.



P.S. Remember, the Electoral College convenes Monday, Dec. 15, to determine who the next president will be. After that, nothing stands in the way of a Barack Obama presidency -- and another nail in the coffin of literal interpretation of our Constitution. So act now!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
2,227
Tokens
I wonder, is this campaign sponsored by FedEx? Somehow the article reads like an advertisement for FedEx.
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
lol...So nothing will change except that FedEx gets a buttload of business delivering these silly letters.

Oh and the makers of Big Rubber Trash Cans should score as well when the hundreds of electoral voters start telling the FedEx guy, "Just drop 'em straight in that can there"
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,123
Tokens
Then you must think the Constitution as silly too right Barman?....According to your post you would use the same trash can for the Constitution...I think the Supremes will hear Bergs case.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
2,227
Tokens
Then you must think the Constitution as silly too right Barman?....According to your post you would use the same trash can for the Constitution...


RR, do you really expect the members of the Electoral College to actually open and read all these identical letters? Or even that it will make a difference to them?
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,123
Tokens
U.S. Supreme Court
Deny, Deny, Deny

[SIZE=+1]Exclusive to Rense.com[/SIZE]
<DT><CENTER>[SIZE=+1]By: Devvy[/SIZE]</CENTER><DT><CENTER>[SIZE=+1]12-9-8[/SIZE]</CENTER><DT><CENTER> </CENTER><DT><CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=555 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="100%"><DL><DT>[SIZE=+1]Today the U.S. Supreme Court denied in the case: DONOFRIO V. WELLS:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]The "high" court denied Leo's application without comment. This means the lower court's decision will stand.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Leo's case deals with the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama being a "natural born citizen" at birth. To review all the details on Leo's case, see here:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Leo Donofrio has been assisting on one other case; Cort Wrontnowski's application, see here:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Cort's case as of today:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"The Cort Wrotnowski V Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State lawsuit that is before the US Supreme Court, has been distributed for conference on December 12, 2008. Leo Donofrio, whose application for stay was denied today, Monday, December 8, 2008, believes that the Cort Wrotnowski case has a better chance than his case had."[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]What does today's denial by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Donofrio case mean from a legal standpoint? According to a friend of mine, a brilliant legal scholar:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"A denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari is NOT a determination on the merits of the case. Denial does NOT mean that Obama is eligible, that the Constitution's eligibility provision is not enforceable in some other case, or anything other than that the Justices are too cowardly to do what is their obvious moral duty in this situation."[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Personally, I see this as a profound act of cowardice on the part of the Supreme Court. There's no way the nine justices are not aware of the massive interest in these cases and the legitimate, pressing question regarding citizenship and a presidential candidate.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]If the Secretary of States in the 50 states have no responsibility in determining a candidate's eligibility or the poltiical party the candidate represents and now the U.S. Supreme Court makes no comment, are we to conclude anyone can be a candidate for president of these united States of America without ever having to prove they are constitutionally qualified?[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]This question must be answered because to ignore it is to foster never ending lawsuits and telling we the people that the U.S. Constitution no longer matters.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]I'm sure the electoral college delegates in this country are breathing a collective sigh of relief. However, it's not over, not by a long shot.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]There are several other active cases at this time, i.e., Lightfoot v Bowen:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://www.drorly.blogspot.com/[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]The petition can be read here; discussion on natural born begins about page 8:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://goexcelglobal.com/share/c146.pdf[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Phil Berg's case is still active:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://www.obamacrimes.com/[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Broe v Reed:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://decalogosintl.org/?p=46[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]The United States Justice Foundation is in the thick of things:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Our efforts to compel Senator Barack Obama to produce a valid birth certificate in order to prove that he is constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States are taking off![/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"As you may already know, we recently filed suit in California to push the issue and, at this very moment, we're helping to fund the suit in Mississippi. We are in communication with other states that have suits in process; and we're putting plans into action to file suits in additional states as well![/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"According to a recent headline in WorldNetDaily, Team Obama tried to dismiss efforts to demand that he prove his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States as "GARBAGE"![/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"But they're taking the matter a little bit more seriously NOW! With each passing day, Team Obama is finding it harder and harder to dismiss the question.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Team Obama would love for this issue to simply die or go away. We're not going to let that happen![/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"If you're committed to this fight, but that means we need your help now more than ever to keep going![/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Wouldn't it be great if we could issue this challenge in every state where Senator Obama won?[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Obama camp: "Lawsuits by citizens are garbage"[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Garbage" ...?[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States, states, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"Enforcing the Constitution of the United States is NOT "garbage" and furthermore, securing the rights of the people under the Constitution is NOT "garbage"![/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"The Obama campaign's response is an elitist, condescending slap in the face to patriotic Americans. No one is above the law and Team Obama cannot make the question of Obama's eligibility go away by disrespecting the American people - and by inference, the Constitution of the United States.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]"That's why we filed our action in California, an action that Senator Obama will not be able to ignore... an action that will not go away!"[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]If you would like to help, please go to the USJF's web site, see here:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://www.usjf.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&catid=13[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Additionally, I have outstanding FOIAs and state records act requests I am and will follow up, even if it means lawsuits. Obama is hiding his true citizenship and anyone who believes otherwise at this point in time, considering his massive effort to fight exposure of legal documents, is in deep denial. We aren't going away.[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]Dr. Edwin Vieira wrote an exception piece today regarding this issue and the Andy Martin case. Edwin goes quite deep into what's down the line if this issue isn't resolved. I highly recommend you take the time to read it:[/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1][/SIZE] <DT>[SIZE=+1]http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin186.htm
[/SIZE]</DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER></DT>http://rense.com/general84/usspr.htm
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
Perhaps the Year's most Golden Comedy to see RoadReeler suddenly becoming a supposed defender of the US Constitution when he's logged a fair number of hours in this very forum trashing the ACLU, whose primary purpose is defense of civil liberties guaranteed under the US Constitution.

THIS IS why I keep comin' back

To get comedy this golden in other venues, I'd probably have to buy expensive tickets
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,894
Tokens
Perhaps the Year's most Golden Comedy to see RoadReeler suddenly becoming a supposed defender of the US Constitution when he's logged a fair number of hours in this very forum trashing the ACLU, whose primary purpose is defense of civil liberties guaranteed under the US Constitution.

THIS IS why I keep comin' back

To get comedy this golden in other venues, I'd probably have to buy expensive tickets

the ACLU, whose primary purpose is defense of civil liberties guaranteed under the US Constitution.

:lolBIG: Most Americans know that statement is complete bullshit.

The ACLU always has been a left wing joke of a political organization that mocks common sense in the name of it's so called justice.

Few organizations are more hated in this country...by the right and the left.

Only the loony left ever defends it.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
I think the Supremes will hear Bergs case.

This only proves your ignorance. The supreme court takes very few cases and they take even less cases that involve crackpots trying to prove a conspiracy theory. And to make matters worse they are even less likely to take a case that is trying to establish that the president elect was born in Kenya when there is already proof that he was born in Hawaii.

So keep hanging on to your conspiracy theory dreams, it only makes it that much sweeter for the rest of us when you guys are proven wrong.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
It is official...it's Barry's Indonesian school documents. From the AP no less. :howdy:

Who is disputing that he went to school in Indonesia?

Still waiting for your source concerning Obama's excessive expenditures in this case. You've made several posts in this thread since my request.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,982
Messages
13,575,740
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com