For Those Banking on the 49ers to Win SB

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
9ers wouldn’t be +230 if they had a proven QB, they got an all star team of unique pieces

is what it is
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,895
Tokens
I am still concerned about the thumb. He is missing throws(i think) because of it...
Only he knows how it is. What's it been , 2 months since he hurt it ? Whether it's back to normal or not, after 2 months, it should be feeling better.
I've seen some misses also, probably a combination of missed throws and receivers not quite on same page.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
If Pats or Fruit want lions at +4.5 we can work something out right now.

I will also take Packers +6(right now) if they play niners first round. Since Pats thinks 6-7 and Fruit thinks 7-8(lol)

I actually bet lions +3.5 on advance line last week, as I think these teams are closer to =, obviously Goff outdoors + the recent historical track record is gonna bump GB some but I think it’ll be competitive.

I’d do SF -5.5 payable in crypto, I said 6-7 so 6 isn’t much value

I have some btc I won in fantasy yesterday ready to be burnt. Should’ve won a full btc but ran into Mike evans 9-200-3, probably why I need to make bets on message boards getting .5 the best of it.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,669
Tokens
I actually bet lions +3.5 on advance line last week, as I think these teams are closer to =, obviously Goff outdoors + the recent historical track record is gonna bump GB some but I think it’ll be competitive.

I’d do SF -5.5 payable in crypto, I said 6-7 so 6 isn’t much value

I have some btc I won in fantasy yesterday ready to be burnt. Should’ve won a full btc but ran into Mike evans 9-200-3, probably why I need to make bets on message boards getting .5 the best of it.
you cant go wrong laying 6. its value. you can just middle out and have 6s and 9s
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
He said 3, I say 6…fair would be 4.5, I’m being generous

we’re talking b2b mvp Aaron GODgers vs a 6th rd pick here
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,669
Tokens
sf is gonna be more like 9 at home to the pack
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
47,802
Tokens
I actually bet lions +3.5 on advance line last week, as I think these teams are closer to =, obviously Goff outdoors + the recent historical track record is gonna bump GB some but I think it’ll be competitive.

I’d do SF -5.5 payable in crypto, I said 6-7 so 6 isn’t much value

I have some btc I won in fantasy yesterday ready to be burnt. Should’ve won a full btc but ran into Mike evans 9-200-3, probably why I need to make bets on message boards getting .5 the best of it.
The guy I played had Brady and Evans. 125 points in our league, the highest 1, 2 score this year for any team. Thanks a lot Tommy B. Still wrapped up second place in my Division in my league by backing in. Only worth about four hundred but it's a seasonal win of a few bucks.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
The guy I played had Brady and Evans. 125 points in our league, the highest 1, 2 score this year for any team. Thanks a lot Tommy B. Still wrapped up second place in my Division in my league by backing in. Only worth about four hundred but it's a seasonal win of a few bucks.

Doubt many started Brady after last weeks struggle vs AZ on Xmas, I had him and limped over the finish line to get to the finals but you’re the 3rd person that’s told me they ran into evans yesterday, which is weird since he sucked all year. He can’t be on more than 5% of teams playing in the championship.

(went Rodgers over Brady yesterday as thought that was clearly correct vs Minnesota but it wouldn’t have even mattered)
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
47,802
Tokens
Doubt many started Brady after last weeks struggle vs AZ on Xmas, I had him and limped over the finish line to get to the finals but you’re the 3rd person that’s told me they ran into evans yesterday, which is weird since he sucked all year. He can’t be on more than 5% of teams playing in the championship.

(went Rodgers over Brady yesterday as thought that was clearly correct vs Minnesota but it wouldn’t have even mattered)
There are no playoffs in our league. We play it out to the finish which was this week as it works nice and neatly for scheduling purposes for a twelve team league. The guy I played had the worst team in the league. That's why he played Brady and Evans. He is gonna win the weekly pool for the highest scoring team. Go figure.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,351
Tokens
Doubt many started Brady after last weeks struggle vs AZ on Xmas, I had him and limped over the finish line to get to the finals but you’re the 3rd person that’s told me they ran into evans yesterday, which is weird since he sucked all year. He can’t be on more than 5% of teams playing in the championship.

(went Rodgers over Brady yesterday as thought that was clearly correct vs Minnesota but it wouldn’t have even mattered)
Weird game

Our championship was Week 16 and had Brady against Evans, which worked out well for me

Unrelated but wonder if more leagues will shift to Week 16 ending
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
Outside of basketball, obviously every other professional sport in the big 4---you make the play-offs you can win the title.

Football use to have a big home field advantage and those teams with a bye had a big advantage but that has faded long ago.

Obviously it wasn't the home field or bye that brought the huge advantage it was just that the better teams were much better--now it's all parity. Everyone is now building their teams using the same system. Much like in poker the best aren't much better than the average.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
47,802
Tokens
Outside of basketball, obviously every other professional sport in the big 4---you make the play-offs you can win the title.

Football use to have a big home field advantage and those teams with a bye had a big advantage but that has faded long ago.

Obviously it wasn't the home field or bye that brought the huge advantage it was just that the better teams were much better--now it's all parity. Everyone is now building their teams using the same system. Much like in poker the best aren't much better than the average.
Well kinda.

QBs still rule.

Championship likely to be between Maholmes, Allen, and Burrow.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Outside of basketball, obviously every other professional sport in the big 4---you make the play-offs you can win the title.

Football use to have a big home field advantage and those teams with a bye had a big advantage but that has faded long ago.

Obviously it wasn't the home field or bye that brought the huge advantage it was just that the better teams were much better--now it's all parity. Everyone is now building their teams using the same system. Much like in poker the best aren't much better than the average.

Havent been very many Cinderella runs in the nfl, I tend to agree with you that 1 game variance is big but still tough to win 3-4 straight as +200 or more. Obviously even 20 years is a small sample in the grand scheme of things, it’s just 20 “sessions”
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
Well kinda.

QBs still rule.

Championship likely to be between Maholmes, Allen, and Burrow.
a great QB gets you in just about every single year. But 1 and done does a great qb no favors.

Hell if Niners catch that Stafford punt throw in the NFC champ game Jimmy gets niners to the SB.

Brady is the expectation but most greats have 2 or less super bowl rings. Even Peyton Manning just had dumb luck to get his second. The guy was benched and was pretty much a liability in his 2nd championship. Drew Brees only made the SB once winning once, Favre only had 1(made it twice) Rodgers has 1. Eli Manning was very average but got 2. Ben was a star, won 2 early and that was it...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
Havent been very many Cinderella runs in the nfl, I tend to agree with you that 1 game variance is big but still tough to win 3-4 straight as +200 or more. Obviously even 20 years is a small sample in the grand scheme of things, it’s just 20 “sessions”
Depends on definition of Cinderalla i guess...Packers did win as 6th seed. in 2011(i believe). Had to win their final play-off game just to make it in...

That was a strange team. Never trailed any game at any point by more then 7 the whole season and post-season.

Eli's Giants i would say made Cinderella runs in both their championship years. His best team was actually the year after they beat Patriots in SB---went 13-3 and of course that year they lose first play-off game of that season. Eli only made play-offs 3 times his entire career.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,115,612
Messages
13,525,726
Members
100,289
Latest member
honggamthienha
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com