ACE IN THE HOLE said:ICEMAN-- I hear what your saying, but you need to elaborate some more.
For example, you said you usually wait until just prior to tip to bet. However, the UCLA total moved real early today. Do you wait prior to tip to see if it moves back or what is your reasoning for this? In other words did you bet this when it moved or did yo wait until 8PM to bet it?
Also, let's say I write down all early lines for tomorrow night. A bunch of the mwill move all day (sides & totals). Be more specific as to what games you play and when you choose to play them. Like I said, I did this years back with CFB and had some success, but never with hoops..Thanks.
PyRo CaPPer said:Ice, what did u think of the games that I posted?
Tom Brady#1 said:He definitely needs to clarify. The best way is to give examples. This week post 10-15 games a night, ICEMAN. Takes 3 minutes to do. This sample will give us a clear indication. Unfortuneately I do not think it is going to happen.
Iceman said:I will state like I did before. I did this back in December and went 14-6 it is in a thread. I have no problem doing this but what point does it prove. I could go 20-30 or 30-20 still will prove NOTHING. Just ask anyone else that does this. If you want to learn attempt to middle/scalp with yourself and you will see where you are winning at. It is VERY time consuming. Halftimes are the BIGGEST goldmines probably of them all and who wants to post them every minute. I am not selling anything. Just trying to help. this is the 2 problems with it:
1) people question where and when you made the play. When I tell you I bet a game with a local or an obscure book that was slow to move I do not feel like arguring with anyone. I sure don't feel like running over to a thread every 3 minutes to post a play then to have someone question it which is always bound to happen. At with halftimes this would be a huge pain in the ass. The bets are not hard to find.
2) anyone 2 people can literally do this and come up with alot of non-steam plays that are not the same. Some games can and do offer 2 great bets on the OPPOSITE side. Not alot but can happen. I will tell you the same thing I tell my buddy. I am not a capper anymore I am a bettor and I honestly barely care if my bets win or lose indiviaully. The big picture is all I care about and if I make good solid wagers I should win.
For example here is what I played today: not sure if this helps:
under 208.5 Phoenix
Depaul +5.5 (2X)
San Antonio -4 2nd half
under 99.5 SA 2nd half
Stanford +5 (1.5X)
Kentucky -8
over 124.5 stanford (2x)
under 145 Georgia Tech
Fairfield pk
N.Texas +6.5
under 97.5 SA 1st half
over 102 Milwaukee 1st half
under 101 Boston 1st half
LA Clippers +2.5
this was a very sloewday because of the total games and I chose to not bet 2nd half in NBA. The best way to prove this is too try and middle and scalp, It will cost you nothing and will prove the point or go back and look at the steam playf from Gand J line service and see what there record is.
PyRo CaPPer said:What line services do you suggest?
PyRo CaPPer said:I think its more than just moving a half point...I would say at least a full point swing, as well as the volume of wagers...LSU, DUKE, UCLA, those games all got about 300,00 wagers that ive seen, compared to the small games that i posted which got less than 8,000 plays wagers....
Tom Brady#1 said:First of all sorry for the inconvenience. After reading above I have a zillion questions. Many of them might be my fault. There is no way you clarified everything you say and it is vague and ambiguous at best. Not saying it is not true but not all black and white for sure. How does middling and scalping as you suggest have to do with steam? How does halftimes relate to this steam? I do not know that line service or have one. you say "anyone 2 people can literally do this and come up with alot of non-steam plays that are not the same"...huh? I have no clue what you are talking about. It could be me but no way is above clear and concise by 5 miles. Who else does this? WHen I have seen steam bettors in the past they all have not done that well or much better than anyone else. I do not remember anyone at FP talking like this either. THanks.
Tom Brady#1 said:Definitely guys. It has been written in books and articles to look at at minimum a 1 point difference at least.
Iceman said:this is exactly where I learned this from. The fezzdaq is just that. Beat ROUGE numbers. That is all he does. Cutter preaches just that. Beat the closing line. Now how you get there is your choice, find value or follow steam but beat the closing line. Fezziks says the best way to win is to bet into non widely availbile numbers.
When the numer you bet at a square book is the same as a Pinny number that is listed at -120 then you are getting a 10 cent edge on your bet. Do you follow? Pinny show +8 -120 so they most likely are +7.5 -110 and you find a +8-110 at square book then bet it at square book. You have a 10 cent edge.
I am saying when you scalp/middle a game you will generally bet a team at sharp book and the opposite bet/team at the slower book.
When you get booted from a book it is for beating them too line moves. That tells you line moves win.
Ask Fish who is professional scalper and he says he has lost around 100k lifetime on the pinnacle side when scalping. Why bet the Pinny side if you are losing to that side.
Why do guys beat SIA all the time because they are slow to move and have rouge type numbers.
50% of the favs win versus the closing number and 50% f the dogs win and now you are getting a extra point by beating them to number on most of your bets than your win pct will go way up.
You are not an inconvience at all. Not trying to sound like a know it all. Just giving you the best examples that I learned from and made the most sense to me. Hope this helps.