Federer the Best Ever? I Think Not - He's not Even the Best Player of This Era

Search

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
He's 31 yrs old. The Game's giants should be Novak and Nadal . They are 25,26 ...prime . Federer managed to win title 17 age 30. Here's hoping he's got one more in him. If not- a comfortable Margin over Sampras , 17 vs 14...never a doubt .

Novak has a ways to go!!....clay is upon us so Mr.Nadal's time to shine. Nice win Novak
 

bet365 player
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
7,609
Tokens
Novak has figured out how to beat Rafa on clay.

BTW:
Rafa >>> Roger
Roger's career >>> Rafa's career
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
Rafa greater than Fed on clay.

He's the best on clay ever. It ends there.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
Lets see Novak beat Rafa at Roland Garros, ....just one win. He does have the stamina and heart to Match Nadal's.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,984
Tokens
Rafa greater than Fed on clay.

He's the best on clay ever. It ends there.

"it ends there"

100% bullshit. Check the stats, nadal owns federer on just about every if not all heads up categories. Look it up. I'm on the run and posting from my phone so I can't.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
Okay. Nadal owns him on most surfaces? 'If not all'? :)

since 2004

indoor carpet - Fed 2-0. (I guess the 'if not all' is out the window? :)....)
grass - Fed 2-1
indoor hard- Fed 2-0
hard- Nadal 8-2

numbers will favor Nadal recently and going forward as Fed is in the twilight of his career. Here's hoping Rafa can approach his Grand Slam titles if not beat it. Rafa WILL beat Sampras' GS total , :). Then the top two will be etched in stone. A Swiss master and a Spanish brute to own the record books making their numbers even more impressive as they played in the same era. .......Bye bye Sampras .
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,984
Tokens
Okay. Nadal owns him on most surfaces? 'If not all'? :)

since 2004

indoor carpet - Fed 2-0. (I guess the 'if not all' is out the window? :)....)
grass - Fed 2-1
indoor hard- Fed 2-0
hard- Nadal 8-2

numbers will favor Nadal recently and going forward as Fed is in the twilight of his career. Here's hoping Rafa can approach his Grand Slam titles if not beat it. Rafa WILL beat Sampras' GS total , :). Then the top two will be etched in stone. A Swiss master and a Spanish brute to own the record books making their numbers even more impressive as they played in the same era. .......Bye bye Sampras .


[h=3]Head-to-head tallies[/h] The following is a breakdown of their head-to-head results:

  • All matches: Nadal, 19–10
  • All finals: Nadal, 13–6

  • Grand Slam matches: Nadal, 8–2
    • Australian Open: Nadal 2-0
    • French Open: Nadal 5-0
    • Wimbledon: Federer 2-1
    • US Open: Have not met
  • Grand Slam finals: Nadal, 6–2



  • Best of five set matches: Nadal, 10–3
    • Five-set matches: Nadal, 3–2
  • Best of three set matches: Nadal, 9–7
[h=3]Results on each court surface[/h]
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
U already posted that a page ago. You asked me to look it up (breakdown of their h2h on all surfaces ) and I did then posted my findings .
 

New member
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
66
Tokens
Definitely the most consistent error with 23 consecutive grand slam semis, talk about low variance trading!
 

bet365 player
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
7,609
Tokens
Lets see Novak beat Rafa at Roland Garros, ....just one win. He does have the stamina and heart to Match Nadal's.

I think there are two more ATP-1000 Tours Madrid & Rome both on clay before the French Open.
If Novak beat Rafa in the next two, Rafa will be underdog for the first time in a very long time going into Roland Garros.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
1,065
Tokens
Nadal is the black beast of Federer. But Roger is the best player of the history. No doubt. If you dont accept this, then leave to watch and bet on tennis and try with the Chess or curling.
 

bet365 player
Joined
Oct 25, 2006
Messages
7,609
Tokens
nadal-federer-blog.jpg


Another final....(<)<
 

Professional At All Times
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
42,732
Tokens
Men's Final - Internazionali BNL D'intalia - Rome (Italy) - Sunday, May 19, 2013 - 10:05 a.m. EDT

R. Nadal -440
R. Federer +355
 

New member
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Messages
12,563
Tokens
nadal 6-4 6-2

nadal will lose serve maybe once, but will break multiple times. fed has a solid serve, but nadal has always been able to return it. nadal on clay is like playing that ping pong game on atari. he will return everything.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,984
Tokens
Nadal is the black beast of Federer. But Roger is the best player of the history. No doubt. If you dont accept this, then leave to watch and bet on tennis and try with the Chess or curling.

You can't call someone the best of all time when they're not even the best player 1-1 in their era. Every other player pre-Federer that has been considered the best of all time owned everyone else 1-1 in their era. Sampras? His main rival was Agassi, who he owned.

Got it?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,984
Tokens
In the men's final, Nadal controlled the match from the start, beating Federer 6-1, 6-3. It was the most lopsided win in the series since Nadal also lost just four games, but over three sets, in the 2008 French Open final against Federer.

Nadal improved to 20-10 in his career against Federer. It was Nadal's fifth title since returning earlier this year from a seven-month layoff due to a left knee injury.
For Williams, her only previous title at this clay-court event came in 2002, when she beat Justine Henin in the final.
That was also the year she won her only title at Roland Garros. Last year in Paris, Williams lost in the opening round of a major for the first time, falling to 111th-ranked Virginie Razzano of France.
"She definitely showed incredible tennis today," Azarenka said of Williams. "But I don't think the score says how close the match was. She was better at the key moments."
She didn't drop a set while winning this title.
Federer had also not dropped a set all week, but he had no reply for Nadal's topspin-heavy groundstrokes. The 17-time Grand Slam winner attempted serving and volleying, but he either missed the volley or Nadal passed him with the return.
Federer lost more points, 10, than he won, nine, at the net. He also committed 32 unforced errors to Nadal's eight.
Center court at the Foro Italico was packed to the limit with 10,500 fans, but the crowd didn't get to see too much tennis. The men's final took only 1 hour, 9 minutes, and the women's final lasted only slightly longer.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,651
Messages
13,558,062
Members
100,667
Latest member
amc8223
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com