[h=1]Who will sustain a fantasy spike?[/h][h=3]Which players with a 20 percent yardage leap can maintain that increase?[/h]
By Chris Sprow | ESPN Insider
It's rare that I get to jump into the fantasy realm, but 'tis the season, and this doubles as a look at key fantasy players and an education in just how hard it is to predict sustainability. If you think of the times you've won a fantasy league, your final roster was almost surely an imperfect blend of (A) guys you relied on who lived up to expectations, (B) good health and (C) a couple of players who outperformed expectations by a fair margin. Think of Sidney Rice in 2009, Jamaal Charles in 2010 or Jordy Nelson in 2011. Each could have been the difference (I still love you, Jamaal) in a fantasy winner; a late-round grab that performs to the level of an RB1 or WR1.
In each of those cases, however, we saw a player who could crush you the following season if you bet too big. Rice got dinged and fell off by over 1,000 yards; Charles got hurt in Week 1 and was out for the year; Nelson dipped by 25 catches and over 500 yards. With that in mind, where do you have Reggie Wayne this year? Was the leap from Curtis Painter to Andrew Luck the difference, or do you assume a dip for a 34-year-old who just spiked in totals by about 40 percent?
Let's make some predictions on the 2013 Spike's class.
A few rules:
1. Players must be ranked within the top 20 in yardage by position for 2012. Yardage is a better indicator balance of real and fantasy performance than the alternative, which is total fantasy points. It better incorporates usage. Points can be skewed by bad luck on touchdowns (and TD vultures). Consider Calvin Johnson in 2011 versus Calvin Johnson in 2012. The 2012 version might have been a better receiver, but had bad touchdown luck. (The Lions really should have a statue of Megatron being tackled at the 1-yard line to memorialize their 2012 season.)
2. Spikes must top 20 percent. Meaning the yardage jump was at least 20 percent more than the previous season.
3. No exceptions for injuries … except at QB. Health is an NFL skill. Just as you choose fantasy players based on a track record of health, teams value them based on their best assumptions of health. But at QB, only Sam Bradford, Matt Schaub and Carson Palmer saw yardage spikes of 20 percent or more in 2012, and Bradford and Schaub jumped purely on health, Palmer because he actually played football. (Colin Kaepernick doesn't qualify based on No. 1 and almost No. 4.)
4. No rookies. There must be a previous NFL performance from which a player can spike.
With that said, let's take a look.
[h=3]Running backs[/h]
The running back yardage combines total running PLUS receiving yardage, just as it does in fantasy football.
Jamaal Charles
2012 yards: 1,745 | 2011 yards: 92 | Spike: 1,896.7%
Sustainable: No. Three reasons. One, last year Charles carried the ball 280 times. That total is 50 carries more than his previous career high (2010). Two, new head coach Andy Reid has never had a runner carry the ball more than 280 times, except for 1999, when Duce Staley did during Reid's first season in Philadelphia -- that team went 5-11. It's notable because Reid from there basically coached winning teams, and didn't allow a runner to pile up a ton of carries even as his team milked leads. He simply loves to throw the ball. Third, the Chiefs drafted Knile Davis to help take some of the load off Charles who, while a brilliant runner, should never be confused for a 300-carry workhorse. If healthy, Charles should get close, but I wouldn't assume he'll top his 2012 total.
<OFFER></OFFER>
Stevan Ridley
2012 yards: 1,314 | 2011 yards: 444 | Spike: 196.0%
Sustainable: Yes. Not only did Ridley establish himself as a clear No. 1 for the Patriots last season, he didn't have an unusually great year in terms of yards per carry -- his 4.4 yards per rush attempt tied for 20th among qualifying backs. The Patriots also could be more reliant on the run this year -- I didn't say "establishing the run" -- as they look to create space for a new group of pass-catchers. As well, Ridley could benefit from running with the lead if New England is more reticent to throw while ahead with those receivers.
Adrian Peterson
2012 yards: 2,314 | 2011 yards: 1,109 | Spike: 108.7%
Sustainable: No. Aside from All Day, six other RBs have run for more than 2,000 yards in a single season. Eric Dickerson, Jamal Lewis, Barry Sanders, Terrell Davis, Chris Johnson and O.J. Simpson averaged 1,071 yards in the following year. Secondly, Peterson piled up an extraordinary 1,184 yards on runs of 15-plus yards last season, and he had 40 such runs, 16 more than any other back. That's the definition of an outlier, and will be hard to replicate based on both luck and the fact that defenses will be more prepared than ever to force Christian Ponder to beat them. That said, even with, say, a 20 percent dip, Peterson is still a good No. 1 pick in fantasy leagues. There's also the very real chance we're dealing with a superhuman, or at least a full-fledged Jedi.
C.J. Spiller
2012 yards: 1,703 | 2011 yards: 830 | Spike: 105.2%
Sustainable: Yes. Spiller won't be confused with Christian Okoye, even though his per-carry stats look like something out of Tecmo Bowl. Problem is, in 2012 Spiller carried the ball 75 fewer times than even the similarly built Charles. Secondly, the Bills would be wise to target Spiller as a receiver more than the 55 times he was targeted in 2012. He's a perfect example of where checkdowns can turn into touchdowns.
BenJarvus Green-Ellis
2012 yards: 1,198 | 2011 yards: 826 | Spike: 45.0%
Sustainable: No. The Law Firm's 2012 totals weren't that prodigious, but I'd expect a drop in production given the presence of Gio Bernard. Bernard was drafted specifically to give the Bengals a better pass-catching threat out of the backfield, which could limit Green-Ellis' roll in obvious passing situations.
Ahmad Bradshaw
2012 yards: 1,260 | 2011 yards: 926 | Spike: 36.1%
Sustainable: No. Bradshaw was picked up by the Colts to supplement a backfield that already includes the now-established Vick Ballard as well as Donald Brown, and he derives a great deal of value from his ability as a blocker on pass plays, where he's one of the NFL's best among running backs. He'll get his touches, but 1,260 total yards is a bit more than we'd expect.
Marshawn Lynch
2012 yards: 1,786 | 2011 yards: 1,416 | Spike: 26.1%
Sustainable: No. Lynch can probably handle it -- Beast Mode is still just 27 entering his seventh NFL season -- but he has 600 carries over the past two seasons, and Seattle drafted Christine Michael who, along with Robert Turbin, will help ease the load. And remember, the Seahawks are a lot more comfortable throwing the ball than they were entering Week 1 in 2012. This offense has evolved and doesn't need the same from Lynch.
[h=3]Wide Receivers[/h]
A good mix of veterans and youth.
Andre Johnson
2012 yards: 1,598 | 2011 yards: 492 | Spike: 224.8%
Sustainable: No. Don't expect a big drop-off, but Johnson is 32, was mostly healthy last season after missing a total of 10 games in 2010 and 2011, and was targeted a whopping 61 more times than any other Houston pass-catcher in 2012. He's still great, but 2012 also quietly represented Johnson's career high in receiving yards, and DeAndre Hopkins was drafted in Round 1 to help take some pressure off. Hopkins is actually a reason Johnson should still succeed, but a dip is a reasonable expectation.
Demaryius Thomas
2012 yards: 1,434 | 2011 yards: 551 | Spike: 160.3%
Sustainable: Yes. Thomas seems to have experienced the effect of a slight upgrade at quarterback, is coming into his own as a technician, and was targeted at just the 13th-highest rate in the NFL despite putting up the fourth-highest receiving yardage total. Even with the presence of Wes Welker, Thomas should get his share of targets. (Welker should, in fact, open up space for Thomas.) Last year, no receiver in the NFL delivered a higher passer rating on balls thrown to him than Thomas, at 126.2, per Pro Football Focus.
Brian Hartline
2012 yards: 1,083 | 2011 yards: 549 | Spike: 97.3%
Sustainable: Yes. Even with Mike Wallace around, it's not unreasonable to think Hartline can crack the 1,000-yard mark again. In fact, Walllace should get Hartline some better matchups, just as he has fellow wide receivers in Pittsburgh over the past two seasons. Combine that with a fair expectation of increased efficiency and accuracy from Ryan Tannehill and it could be a repeat year of effective sleeper status for Hartline.
Eric Decker
2012 yards: 1,064 | 2011 yards: 612 | Spike: 73.9%
Sustainable: No. As prodigious as Manning is, the last time he had three different pass-catchers pile up 1,000 yards was in 2004. Decker should still pile up a decent total, but I'd expect a slight dip in yardage. Welker will get some of his targets, and he's not the deep threat that Thomas is.
Lance Moore
2012 yards: 1,041 | 2011 yards: 627 | Spike: 66.3%
Sustainable: Yes. He has been overshadowed, but is a favorite of Drew Brees, and New Orleans will throw it all over.
Dez Bryant
2012 yards: 1,382 | 2011 yards: 928 | Spike: 48.9%
Sustainable: Yes. He increased his target total by 35 last season from 103 to 138, and was targeted no fewer than six times in any of the Cowboys' last seven games of 2012, a period in which he became one of the NFL's toughest covers. Last season, Dallas QBs had a traditional passer rating of 123.2 when throwing to Bryant, behind only Decker and Thomas. What that creates is a situation where a player sees benefit-of-the-doubt targets while decently covered. Bryant gets the benefit now.
Reggie Wayne
2012 yards: 1,355 | 2011 yards: 960 | Spike: 41.2%
Sustainable: No. I don't expect Wayne to dip in terms of performance, I expect a shift in the offense. Pep Hamilton, Indy's new offensive coordinator who comes from Stanford, loves to use his tight ends. Last season, Cardinal tight end Zach Ertz led the team in receptions by 36 catches. The year before, no Stanford wide receiver caught more than 56 passes, and Coby Fleener -- now a Colt and a tight end on that 2011 Stanford team -- averaged six more yards per catch than the leading receiver. Wayne will have a big role, he'll just be relied upon a little less as Indy diversifies and builds the offense from the inside out.
[h=3]Tight Ends[/h]None of the following names are fantasy studs, but they'll get the job done.
Brandon Myers
2012 yards: 806 | 2011 yards: 151 | Spike: 81.3%
Sustainable: Yes. This is a leap of faith, but if Myers becomes a favorite target at tight end, it's possible he could come close or maybe even surpass that 806-yard total. Think of what kind of matchups he might see when defenses have to focus on Hakeem Nicks, Victor Cruz and the emerging Rueben Randle. It's going to be interesting to see how Myers is deployed. He may not become a traveling emcee with Eli, but they could form a bond.
Martellus Bennett
2012 yards: 626 | 2011 yards: 144 | Spike: 77.0%
Sustainable: Yes. Jay Cutler loves to use tight ends and work the windows in the middle of the field. Kellen Davis got 44 targets last season for the Bears. Bennett should exceed that, and help soak up some of the ridiculous 194 throws directed at Brandon Marshall last season.
Heath Miller
2012 yards: 816 | 2011 yards: 631 | Spike: 22.7%
Sustainable: No -- but that's only because Miller is currently recovering from a torn ACL. When fully healthy, Miller will absorb more targets given the absence of Wallace, and Pittsburgh hates to take him off the field anyway because he's a tremendous pass-blocker. He saw over 1,000 snaps last season. If he is healthy, I'd say he'll sustain it, which is a reason to grab him late.
Jermaine Gresham
2012 yards: 737 | 2011 yards: 596 | Spike: 19.2%
Sustainable: Yes. Surprised? I mean, didn't the Bengals draft Tyler Eifert in part because of dissatisfaction with Gresham? Well, we've now seen plenty of cases where teams with two good tight ends get plenty of production from both; cracking 700 yards again isn't exactly a leap of faith on a player of Gresham's great physical skills; and Eifert's presence (not to mention that A.J. Green fella) will only open up more space for Gresham. (And yes, I broke the 20 percent rule, barely, but Gresham's worth spending a few extra pixels on.)
By Chris Sprow | ESPN Insider
It's rare that I get to jump into the fantasy realm, but 'tis the season, and this doubles as a look at key fantasy players and an education in just how hard it is to predict sustainability. If you think of the times you've won a fantasy league, your final roster was almost surely an imperfect blend of (A) guys you relied on who lived up to expectations, (B) good health and (C) a couple of players who outperformed expectations by a fair margin. Think of Sidney Rice in 2009, Jamaal Charles in 2010 or Jordy Nelson in 2011. Each could have been the difference (I still love you, Jamaal) in a fantasy winner; a late-round grab that performs to the level of an RB1 or WR1.
In each of those cases, however, we saw a player who could crush you the following season if you bet too big. Rice got dinged and fell off by over 1,000 yards; Charles got hurt in Week 1 and was out for the year; Nelson dipped by 25 catches and over 500 yards. With that in mind, where do you have Reggie Wayne this year? Was the leap from Curtis Painter to Andrew Luck the difference, or do you assume a dip for a 34-year-old who just spiked in totals by about 40 percent?
Let's make some predictions on the 2013 Spike's class.
A few rules:
1. Players must be ranked within the top 20 in yardage by position for 2012. Yardage is a better indicator balance of real and fantasy performance than the alternative, which is total fantasy points. It better incorporates usage. Points can be skewed by bad luck on touchdowns (and TD vultures). Consider Calvin Johnson in 2011 versus Calvin Johnson in 2012. The 2012 version might have been a better receiver, but had bad touchdown luck. (The Lions really should have a statue of Megatron being tackled at the 1-yard line to memorialize their 2012 season.)
2. Spikes must top 20 percent. Meaning the yardage jump was at least 20 percent more than the previous season.
3. No exceptions for injuries … except at QB. Health is an NFL skill. Just as you choose fantasy players based on a track record of health, teams value them based on their best assumptions of health. But at QB, only Sam Bradford, Matt Schaub and Carson Palmer saw yardage spikes of 20 percent or more in 2012, and Bradford and Schaub jumped purely on health, Palmer because he actually played football. (Colin Kaepernick doesn't qualify based on No. 1 and almost No. 4.)
4. No rookies. There must be a previous NFL performance from which a player can spike.
With that said, let's take a look.
[h=3]Running backs[/h]
The running back yardage combines total running PLUS receiving yardage, just as it does in fantasy football.
Jamaal Charles
2012 yards: 1,745 | 2011 yards: 92 | Spike: 1,896.7%
Sustainable: No. Three reasons. One, last year Charles carried the ball 280 times. That total is 50 carries more than his previous career high (2010). Two, new head coach Andy Reid has never had a runner carry the ball more than 280 times, except for 1999, when Duce Staley did during Reid's first season in Philadelphia -- that team went 5-11. It's notable because Reid from there basically coached winning teams, and didn't allow a runner to pile up a ton of carries even as his team milked leads. He simply loves to throw the ball. Third, the Chiefs drafted Knile Davis to help take some of the load off Charles who, while a brilliant runner, should never be confused for a 300-carry workhorse. If healthy, Charles should get close, but I wouldn't assume he'll top his 2012 total.
<OFFER></OFFER>
Stevan Ridley
2012 yards: 1,314 | 2011 yards: 444 | Spike: 196.0%
Sustainable: Yes. Not only did Ridley establish himself as a clear No. 1 for the Patriots last season, he didn't have an unusually great year in terms of yards per carry -- his 4.4 yards per rush attempt tied for 20th among qualifying backs. The Patriots also could be more reliant on the run this year -- I didn't say "establishing the run" -- as they look to create space for a new group of pass-catchers. As well, Ridley could benefit from running with the lead if New England is more reticent to throw while ahead with those receivers.
Adrian Peterson
2012 yards: 2,314 | 2011 yards: 1,109 | Spike: 108.7%
Sustainable: No. Aside from All Day, six other RBs have run for more than 2,000 yards in a single season. Eric Dickerson, Jamal Lewis, Barry Sanders, Terrell Davis, Chris Johnson and O.J. Simpson averaged 1,071 yards in the following year. Secondly, Peterson piled up an extraordinary 1,184 yards on runs of 15-plus yards last season, and he had 40 such runs, 16 more than any other back. That's the definition of an outlier, and will be hard to replicate based on both luck and the fact that defenses will be more prepared than ever to force Christian Ponder to beat them. That said, even with, say, a 20 percent dip, Peterson is still a good No. 1 pick in fantasy leagues. There's also the very real chance we're dealing with a superhuman, or at least a full-fledged Jedi.
C.J. Spiller
2012 yards: 1,703 | 2011 yards: 830 | Spike: 105.2%
Sustainable: Yes. Spiller won't be confused with Christian Okoye, even though his per-carry stats look like something out of Tecmo Bowl. Problem is, in 2012 Spiller carried the ball 75 fewer times than even the similarly built Charles. Secondly, the Bills would be wise to target Spiller as a receiver more than the 55 times he was targeted in 2012. He's a perfect example of where checkdowns can turn into touchdowns.
BenJarvus Green-Ellis
2012 yards: 1,198 | 2011 yards: 826 | Spike: 45.0%
Sustainable: No. The Law Firm's 2012 totals weren't that prodigious, but I'd expect a drop in production given the presence of Gio Bernard. Bernard was drafted specifically to give the Bengals a better pass-catching threat out of the backfield, which could limit Green-Ellis' roll in obvious passing situations.
Ahmad Bradshaw
2012 yards: 1,260 | 2011 yards: 926 | Spike: 36.1%
Sustainable: No. Bradshaw was picked up by the Colts to supplement a backfield that already includes the now-established Vick Ballard as well as Donald Brown, and he derives a great deal of value from his ability as a blocker on pass plays, where he's one of the NFL's best among running backs. He'll get his touches, but 1,260 total yards is a bit more than we'd expect.
Marshawn Lynch
2012 yards: 1,786 | 2011 yards: 1,416 | Spike: 26.1%
Sustainable: No. Lynch can probably handle it -- Beast Mode is still just 27 entering his seventh NFL season -- but he has 600 carries over the past two seasons, and Seattle drafted Christine Michael who, along with Robert Turbin, will help ease the load. And remember, the Seahawks are a lot more comfortable throwing the ball than they were entering Week 1 in 2012. This offense has evolved and doesn't need the same from Lynch.
[h=3]Wide Receivers[/h]
A good mix of veterans and youth.
Andre Johnson
2012 yards: 1,598 | 2011 yards: 492 | Spike: 224.8%
Sustainable: No. Don't expect a big drop-off, but Johnson is 32, was mostly healthy last season after missing a total of 10 games in 2010 and 2011, and was targeted a whopping 61 more times than any other Houston pass-catcher in 2012. He's still great, but 2012 also quietly represented Johnson's career high in receiving yards, and DeAndre Hopkins was drafted in Round 1 to help take some pressure off. Hopkins is actually a reason Johnson should still succeed, but a dip is a reasonable expectation.
Demaryius Thomas
2012 yards: 1,434 | 2011 yards: 551 | Spike: 160.3%
Sustainable: Yes. Thomas seems to have experienced the effect of a slight upgrade at quarterback, is coming into his own as a technician, and was targeted at just the 13th-highest rate in the NFL despite putting up the fourth-highest receiving yardage total. Even with the presence of Wes Welker, Thomas should get his share of targets. (Welker should, in fact, open up space for Thomas.) Last year, no receiver in the NFL delivered a higher passer rating on balls thrown to him than Thomas, at 126.2, per Pro Football Focus.
Brian Hartline
2012 yards: 1,083 | 2011 yards: 549 | Spike: 97.3%
Sustainable: Yes. Even with Mike Wallace around, it's not unreasonable to think Hartline can crack the 1,000-yard mark again. In fact, Walllace should get Hartline some better matchups, just as he has fellow wide receivers in Pittsburgh over the past two seasons. Combine that with a fair expectation of increased efficiency and accuracy from Ryan Tannehill and it could be a repeat year of effective sleeper status for Hartline.
Eric Decker
2012 yards: 1,064 | 2011 yards: 612 | Spike: 73.9%
Sustainable: No. As prodigious as Manning is, the last time he had three different pass-catchers pile up 1,000 yards was in 2004. Decker should still pile up a decent total, but I'd expect a slight dip in yardage. Welker will get some of his targets, and he's not the deep threat that Thomas is.
Lance Moore
2012 yards: 1,041 | 2011 yards: 627 | Spike: 66.3%
Sustainable: Yes. He has been overshadowed, but is a favorite of Drew Brees, and New Orleans will throw it all over.
Dez Bryant
2012 yards: 1,382 | 2011 yards: 928 | Spike: 48.9%
Sustainable: Yes. He increased his target total by 35 last season from 103 to 138, and was targeted no fewer than six times in any of the Cowboys' last seven games of 2012, a period in which he became one of the NFL's toughest covers. Last season, Dallas QBs had a traditional passer rating of 123.2 when throwing to Bryant, behind only Decker and Thomas. What that creates is a situation where a player sees benefit-of-the-doubt targets while decently covered. Bryant gets the benefit now.
Reggie Wayne
2012 yards: 1,355 | 2011 yards: 960 | Spike: 41.2%
Sustainable: No. I don't expect Wayne to dip in terms of performance, I expect a shift in the offense. Pep Hamilton, Indy's new offensive coordinator who comes from Stanford, loves to use his tight ends. Last season, Cardinal tight end Zach Ertz led the team in receptions by 36 catches. The year before, no Stanford wide receiver caught more than 56 passes, and Coby Fleener -- now a Colt and a tight end on that 2011 Stanford team -- averaged six more yards per catch than the leading receiver. Wayne will have a big role, he'll just be relied upon a little less as Indy diversifies and builds the offense from the inside out.
[h=3]Tight Ends[/h]None of the following names are fantasy studs, but they'll get the job done.
Brandon Myers
2012 yards: 806 | 2011 yards: 151 | Spike: 81.3%
Sustainable: Yes. This is a leap of faith, but if Myers becomes a favorite target at tight end, it's possible he could come close or maybe even surpass that 806-yard total. Think of what kind of matchups he might see when defenses have to focus on Hakeem Nicks, Victor Cruz and the emerging Rueben Randle. It's going to be interesting to see how Myers is deployed. He may not become a traveling emcee with Eli, but they could form a bond.
Martellus Bennett
2012 yards: 626 | 2011 yards: 144 | Spike: 77.0%
Sustainable: Yes. Jay Cutler loves to use tight ends and work the windows in the middle of the field. Kellen Davis got 44 targets last season for the Bears. Bennett should exceed that, and help soak up some of the ridiculous 194 throws directed at Brandon Marshall last season.
Heath Miller
2012 yards: 816 | 2011 yards: 631 | Spike: 22.7%
Sustainable: No -- but that's only because Miller is currently recovering from a torn ACL. When fully healthy, Miller will absorb more targets given the absence of Wallace, and Pittsburgh hates to take him off the field anyway because he's a tremendous pass-blocker. He saw over 1,000 snaps last season. If he is healthy, I'd say he'll sustain it, which is a reason to grab him late.
Jermaine Gresham
2012 yards: 737 | 2011 yards: 596 | Spike: 19.2%
Sustainable: Yes. Surprised? I mean, didn't the Bengals draft Tyler Eifert in part because of dissatisfaction with Gresham? Well, we've now seen plenty of cases where teams with two good tight ends get plenty of production from both; cracking 700 yards again isn't exactly a leap of faith on a player of Gresham's great physical skills; and Eifert's presence (not to mention that A.J. Green fella) will only open up more space for Gresham. (And yes, I broke the 20 percent rule, barely, but Gresham's worth spending a few extra pixels on.)