Exbookie wants to help the players week 11

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
83
Tokens
Boyz, Pick a % and calculate that percentage of whatever Ace makes his picks...thats what I do. He bets 1000.00 - I adjust down to fit my bankroll. With a $300 bankroll..you might be looking at a number around 1% or a little more ..he bets 3000..you bet $30 - he bets 1000..u bet 10. The key is Money Mgmt...Good Luck
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
15,046
Tokens
I lost a lot of money about 20 years ago before I started winning!


Then I was a bookie myself and I learned alot from just being a bookie. But it took a few years before I started making money year-in and year-out.


But dont just follow ACES picks and think that you will start winning. He has the ability to go 0-5 on a weekend just like everyone else. Using gambling as a form of entertainment with these small limits. You will have more fun just picking your own games at this level.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
531
Tokens
I lost a lot of money about 20 years ago before I started winning!


Then I was a bookie myself and I learned alot from just being a bookie. But it took a few years before I started making money year-in and year-out.


But dont just follow ACES picks and think that you will start winning. He has the ability to go 0-5 on a weekend just like everyone else. Using gambling as a form of entertainment with these small limits. You will have more fun just picking your own games at this level.

Thanks for the advice but dammit i want to make some money lol. and i keep trying to fade public with percentages and i'm getting burned. i would be cool with just making 50 extra bucks a week.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
531
Tokens
Boyz, Pick a % and calculate that percentage of whatever Ace makes his picks...thats what I do. He bets 1000.00 - I adjust down to fit my bankroll. With a $300 bankroll..you might be looking at a number around 1% or a little more ..he bets 3000..you bet $30 - he bets 1000..u bet 10. The key is Money Mgmt...Good Luck

ty blindate
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
1,056
Tokens
its been factor in:toast:AA

Hey ace, I love your picks and everything that you represent. But how is factoring in portis and factoring all they guys that are returning for dallas do you still come up with Washington? Mind you, I never questioned any of your picks until now.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
15,046
Tokens
Thanks for the advice but dammit i want to make some money lol. and i keep trying to fade public with percentages and i'm getting burned. i would be cool with just making 50 extra bucks a week.


No reason to actually fade the public this year. The public has been on a major roll in the big games
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
10
Tokens
Ladell Betts (knee) confirmed Friday that he will play in Week 11.
Betts has resumed practicing fully and is setup to see most of the Skins' rushing work on Sunday Night Football. Coach Jim Zorn has made it clear that he's more comfortable using Betts than Shaun Alexander with Clinton Portis set to be inactive. Betts can be relied on as a low-end RB2 against a very mediocre Dallas rush defense that surrenders 4.2 yards per carry. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2008/11/betts_says_hell_play.html?nav=rss_blog
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
1,632
Tokens
$2000.00 #402 Atlanta (-6) over Denver (1 p.m., Sunday, Nov. 16)
We have ridden the Falcons a lot this year and I just do not trust this Denver defense to be able to stop the Atlanta ground game. The Falcons are riding some momentum off a big win at home over New Orleans last week. Their secondary played well against Drew Brees and the Saints high-powered passing attack and I think they can do the same against Jay Cutler and Co. Cutler has been making shaky decisions with the ball and I just don’t think that this Broncos team is as good as their record indicates. Denver is 4-12 ATS on the road and is 8-24-1 ATS in its last 33 overall.

$2000.00 #428 Washington (+1.5) over Dallas (8 p.m., Sunday, Nov. 16)
Even out of a bye week the Cowboys are still overrated. I think that there are some fundamental issues with Dallas that can’t be fixed in an extra week and I don’t think they should be favored on the road here. The underdog is 20-6 ATS in this series, the home team is 5-1 SU, and the Redskins are 6-1 ATS in the last seven in this series. This is a rivalry series where the underdog and the home team have performed very well. Here we are backing a home dog. I think it’s great value.

$800.00 ‘Under’ 44.5 St. Louis at San Francisco (4 p.m., Sunday, Nov. 16)
Four straight in this series have stayed under the total and four of five on the grass in San Fran have gone ‘under’. The Niners defense has been playing better as of late, even though the numbers don’t support that. They have played five of the top offenses in the league – Arizona, Seattle, the Giants, New Orleans, and Philadelphia – and have gotten demolished. But St. Louis’ offense is more their speed. The Rams gave up 47 points last week and I’m sure their coaches were all over them this week. I expect a more inspired effort.

$600.00 #407 Houston (+8.5) over Indianapolis (1 p.m, Sunday, Nov. 16)
I think the Colts are primed for a letdown this weekend after a big win against the Steelers. It’s not that I don’t think they can beat the Texans, it’s that I think this number is too large for them to cover with their defense. Houston was dominating the Colts just a few weekends ago in Texas before blowing their late lead. The Colts are just 3-10 ATS in their last 13 divisional games.

$3000.00 ‘Over’ 38.5 Minnesota at Tampa Bay (1 p.m., Sunday, Nov. 16)
The general consensus is that these are two strong defenses and that this should be a grind-it-out game. However, the numbers suggest something different. Minnesota has averaged a total of 47.2 points per game overall and on the road they are averaging a total of 59.7 points per game. Basically, the Vikings’ defense is not nearly as strong as the public thinks it is. Five of their last six games have gone ‘over’, and most of them have gone ‘over’ by at least 10 points. On the other side, Tampa Bay’s offense is much better than its numbers suggest as well. Their problems have been in the red zone. But I think that Jon Gruden put in extra time and extra work on this aspect of their game during the bye week and I expect to see some new wrinkles. The ‘over’ is 5-0 in the last five meetings in Tampa Bay and 5-2 in the last seven meetings overall. The ‘over’ is 4-1 in Tampa’s last five games of a week or rest and is 16-5-2 in Minnesota’s last seven games after an ATS loss.

TEASER

HOU+18.5
WASH+11
SF UNDER 54...........................$480/$400

With you on ATL, WAS, and HOU. I will probably add BAL as well.

Staying away from the O/U plays though. I posted earlier why I don't like the STL/SF play. Same reasoning for staying away from the MIN/TB over.

TB was selected for 5 overs and no unders using this system. they are 1-4 on the overs. MIN has been selected for 1 under and no overs. They are 1-0 on the under. so I put the over play for TB/MIN at a 1-5 trend. Difficult for me to bet on that even with the 11pt value.

Certainly wish you BOL on all 5 of these though!:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
1,632
Tokens
These are the plays for this week with a +17 value. First time that there are that many +20 plays and one close to 30! I have verified the numbers by hand and it matches. I just updated the numbers above based on current lines. Keep the following things in mind if you plan on wagering on these games.

1) I HAVE NEVER WATCHED COLLEGE FOOTBALL BEFORE THIS YEAR!

2) I DONT CAP COLLEGE FOOTBALL!

3) I CANT NAME ONE PLAYER IN COLLEGE!!

4) THIS IS STRICTLY BASED ON NUMBERS!

So if after reading all of that you still want to wager Kazillion dollars on these games please dont blame me, ACE, or Jackal who made the spreadsheet if the picks lose :lol:

Samy-

Total on SMU/UTEP has dropped from 73 to 68.5. Looks good! :103631605

Likewise, UCLA/Washington has dropped from 47.5 to 45.5. Looks like the under is the side t obe on for both of these plays!
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,716
Tokens
I'm a very small time gambler compared to your bankroll. But none the less i just saw your picks and i need your help. I am on a very limited budget and probably shouldn't be gambling, but is kind of in my blood and sure could use a little extra money. So here is the scenerio. I have a local book that i use a website to place wagers. He has me capped at 350.00 limit. So i've already sucked it up this week and i'm at -90.52 and have 259.48 left to wager with. So i was wondering if you can help me with the money management and what amount of this bankroll to put on each of your games. Thank you in advance and totally understand if you are to busy.
Thank you

so you are saying that if you made two bets at 175 each...He will not let youbet any more until you pay...this is no book!!!very hard to win when one limits your amounts

cant tell you how much to play...but...take your stand on two plays that are the best of the best of the week...you have to think that both will not loses and you are hoping that they both win!!

you need to find another book...for sure
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,716
Tokens
Hey ace, I love your picks and everything that you represent. But how is factoring in portis and factoring all they guys that are returning for dallas do you still come up with Washington? Mind you, I never questioned any of your picks until now.

<TABLE cellPadding=0 width=900 bgColor=#eeeeee border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">11/14/2008 4:17:55 PM </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Felix Jones </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">RB </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Hamstring </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Out </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Jones (hamstring) has been ruled out of Sunday's game. </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">As expected, the Cowboys are taking the cautious route. </TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#ffffff colSpan=7>
spacer.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">11/14/2008 5:41:58 PM </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Tony Romo </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">QB </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Finger </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">probable </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Romo (finger) is probable for Sunday's game. </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">He should start this critical NFC East battle. </TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#ffffff colSpan=7>
spacer.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">11/14/2008 5:42:34 PM </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Jason Witten </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">TE </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Ribs </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">probable </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">Witten (ribs) is probable for Sunday's game. </TD><TD style="PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-SIZE: 8pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 3px">He should be fine to start; deploy him as usual. </TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#ffffff colSpan=7>
spacer.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Washington Redskins



RB Ladell Betts took full practice on Thursday, his first since he sprained a knee on Oct. 12 against Cleveland. Betts will likely start for Portis on Sunday.

this = out!....Betts will do fine

there more to doing match-up than one or two plays

o-line
wash is no 11 vs dall no.12................................even

D-line is number 4 vs dallas no. 11.......................Edge Wash

Receivers
wash moss no.5 vs terrell Owens no 18...............edge Wash

dall wins the RB spot.........................................edge dallas

LINE OFF
WASH -16 VS DALLAS-51...................................EDGE WASH

TIME
WASH +18 VS DALLAS -6...................................EDGE WASH

PLT
WASH 493 VS DAL 570.......................................EDGE WASH

TURN OVERS

WASH 10 VS DAL 19..........................................EDGE WASH

PLAYING IN WASH.............................................EDGE FOR WASH

when my four stats match all 4 on one side..it gets a good look

wash won last game by 2 in dallas...they will win by more in this game even without there key RB....one man is not a team...and he has been factor in:toast:AA
 

Deuce-Deuce
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
738
Tokens
Samy-

Total on SMU/UTEP has dropped from 73 to 68.5. Looks good! :103631605

Likewise, UCLA/Washington has dropped from 47.5 to 45.5. Looks like the under is the side t obe on for both of these plays!

yup I saw...I think the SMU opened at 75 also
 

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
215
Tokens
Ace - You are right about Betts. If he is healthy he will do just fine. The drop off from Portis to him is not as severe as the one between Betts and Alexander.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,329
Tokens
Thanks for the advice but dammit i want to make some money lol. and i keep trying to fade public with percentages and i'm getting burned. i would be cool with just making 50 extra bucks a week.

Let me start by saying I have nothing against you personally so take this as friendly advice.

You will NEVER be a long term winner in sports wagering with the attitude you give off. I get the vibe that you are an action junkie & willing to force plays just to make some money. Winning isn't as simple as betting against a specific group, etc...

The real long term winners are always crafting & honing their skills to become a consistent winner. The goal of a real winner is to show a profit at the end of the respective season. We accept that there will be bad days or weeks but in the end we will get the job done.

If you are going in with the mentality that you are displaying, you are already behind the 8 ball. Being successful at this is more mental & belief in your knowledge of the respective sport, human emotion, etc.. as compared to what stats say.

Take my advice & finish up your week & sit back for the rest of the season to analyze & hone in on your skill set which you can then turn around & make money with.

GL
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
so you are saying that if you made two bets at 175 each...He will not let youbet any more until you pay...this is no book!!!very hard to win when one limits your amounts

cant tell you how much to play...but...take your stand on two plays that are the best of the best of the week...you have to think that both will not loses and you are hoping that they both win!!

you need to find another book...for sure

Ace...he probably is capped for a reason, very wrong advice you are giving him...very out of character for you...
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,716
Tokens
ACE how do you feel about this Teaser
Eagles OVER 32
Rams +16.5
Miami -.5

They all look good when you move the line 10 points... your one that goes against my lean is Phi over 32...I got it at 36 and under the 42

best to you
Ace
 

EX BOOKIE
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
20,716
Tokens
What the sharps are thinking about this week's nfl games

from my friend Nick

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]DIRECT FROM NEVADA
WITH LINESMAKER NICK BOGDANOVICH
[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]WHAT THE SHARPS ARE THINKING ABOUT THIS WEEK'S NFL GAMES[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Boy this season is going fast isn't it? We're into the second half of the 2008 pro football campaign. College teams will be finishing up their seasons in the next few weeks![/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It's the weekend, which means it's time to run through what the sharps are thinking about upcoming NFL games. As always, we take them all in rotation order.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]DENVER AT ATLANTA: The sharps loved Atlanta out of the gate here, driving an opening line of -4 all the way up to -6. It's true that no critical numbers were crossed (3 or 7), but that's still a big move considering that Denver had a few extra days to prepare. You're seeing a lot of respect for this strong Atlanta offense and stellar rookie Matt Ryan. The action stopped at -6 though, so the sharps aren't playing Atlanta at the line you're seeing right now. It's worth nothing that they didn't buy anything back on Denver though. They're waiting to see if the public takes the line higher on game day for that. Not much movement on the total. Some of the math guys like the Over here because Denver plays high scoring games much of the time as it is. This week's game is indoors, meaning conditions will be perfect for scoring. A lot of old school guys won't go Over anything in the 50's. That has served them well in recent years. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]OAKLAND AT MIAMI: Not much interest here early on. Most sharps play underdogs. It's very hard to play Oakland right now given how poorly they played the last two weeks. They just lost at home 41-6 over two games...and that was with a dead second half against Atlanta. You can't cover spreads averaging just 3 points per game! It's also an early kickoff for the Raiders on the East Coast. I talked about the "bad body clock"issues earlier this season. All of that has turned a probable dog play into a pass for the sharps. Very few would lay big points with a team like Miami. The Dolphins couldn't cover a lesser line last week against another bad body clock team. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]BALTIMORE AT NY GIANTS: This could be a great game. But, the early sharp money was actually on the Giants at -6. I'm seeing -7 right now. Why would sharps bet a favorite early when a great "defensive dog"like Baltimore is getting points? It's the third straight road game for the Ravens. That's going to scare off a lot of guys who used to bet that angle in the past. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if some guys were taking a position to come back later at a more favorable line. You saw that with New England all the time last year. The Giants are the closest thing we have to New England this year in terms of a public team that keeps winning games. You take a position under the critical number, hope it goes over the critical number, then come back over the top on the underdog at the better line. I think we'd see A LOT of sharp money come in on Baltimore at +7.5. The total has dropped from 42 down to 40.5, suggesting that defenses will rule the day. Sharps like betting Unders up North in November and December anyway. That didn't work out in the Giants/Eagles game, or Jets/Patriots this past Thursday night. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]HOUSTON AT INDIANAPOLIS: Given how badly Houston has been playing vs. good teams this year, and Indy's recent strong play (winning at Pittsburgh last week), oddsmakers were afraid of getting buried with Colts money in this game. They opened the number at a very high 9.5...only to see the sharps come in and hit Houston strong. I'm currently seeing Indiana by 7.5 or 8, which is right in the teaser window. You can bet Indianapolis will be in a lot of teasers this weekend. I wouldn't be surprised to see the line go back up to -9 to discourage that. The total moved up from 50 to 50.5, which is actually a reasonably strong move considering how few sharps will play Over totals that high. Some were confident enough to do it anyway. To this point, I can't say the sharps "love"Houston +9.5. They see value there, and positioned themselves to use the Colts in basic strategy teasers too. These guys are pros for a reason![/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]TENNESSEE AT JACKSONVILLE: There's been money coming in on Jacksonville, as many sharps like going against undefeated teams in the second half of the season. The line hasn't moved off a field goal though because it's such a critical number. If you want to take the home dog, you have to lay -130 on the moneyline for the privilege. You can take Tennessee -3 at +110. If a line's not going to move, sharps still find a way to get a better price on the juice. The total has gone up from 38.5 to 39.5 here. Tennessee threw a lot of passes last week. If that continues, they'll play higher scoring games that you might expect from this point on. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]CHICAGO AT GREEN BAY: There was early underdog and Under sentiment here, as the line dropped from Green Bay -4 to -3.5, and the total from 44 to 42.5. Early week news suggested that Kyle Orton was going to try and play this week. That's good news for the Bears, and helps the Under because he's more conservative than Rex Grossman. To me this is an information move. I don't think the sharps want to bet on Grossman again. Many took a shot on him vs. Tennessee last week and lost their money. They'll bet on Orton for sure as a dog, particularly with Green Bay coming off a pair of nailbiters the last two weeks. It's supposed to be cold in the Midwest too this week. If the forecast is bad, look for that total to drop even more. Then, marvel that the sharps got Under 44 in a bad weather game![/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]PHILADELPHIA AT CINCINNATI: The big move here was on the total, which dropped from 43 down to 41. I expect that's weather related, because Philadelphia isn't really playing defensive battles on the road this year. Cincy's defense has been better than expected though. That and a bye week could inspire a good result for the Bengals. The team side line has dropped from 9.5 to 9. Cincinnati did win the last time they took the field too. That was against struggling Jacksonville though. I think we'll see some stragglers on the Bengals come game day because sharps like home dogs who are likely to bring an effort. A bad weather forecast will definitely bring more dog and Under money. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]NEW ORLEANS AT KANSAS CITY: We have rare favorite and Over sentiment from the sharps, which suggests they must really like the New Orleans offense here! That makes a lot of sense because New Orleans does have a great offense, is coming off a loss, and will be facing the tired and shorthanded defense of Kansas City. The team side line jumped from -4 to -5.5 on the Saints. The total moved up from 48 to 50 even with the chance for cold weather this weekend. Drew Brees played his college ball at Purdue, so he can handle the weather. The "default"move for sharps is usually dog and Under. When you see favorite and Over, it's best to pay attention. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]DETROIT AT CAROLINA: A surprising move to the Over here, as an opener of 39 went up to 40.5. Do the sharps think Daunte Culpepper is going to start scoring touchdowns? Maybe they've penciled him in for one or two. I take that move to be more of a Carolina blowout scenario where points come easy in the second half in garbage time. The team side line hasn't moved from -14. The sharps didn't see anything last week from Culpepper that suggests he's a money guy right now. Most sharps are leaving this game alone outside of those who bet the total. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]MINNESOTA AT TAMPA BAY: There was a big Under move here from 41.5 down to 38.5. I was a bit surprised at that given Minnesota's penchant for playing high scoring games of late. Gus Frerotte is very turnover prone. That sets up easy scores for the other team. Tampa Bay just went Over at Kansas City in their last game too. Clearly the sharps expect the defenses to rule. And, Tampa Bay generally plays Unders as home favorites because they know how to run clock with a lead. I'm not a total guy, so I probably shouldn't argue against a 3-point move! Not much action on the team side, though I have seen -4 drop to -3.5 here and there. It's mostly Tampa Bay -4 everywhere as I write this. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]ST. LOUIS AT SAN FRANCISCO: Not much movement in this one. What's happened here is a rare favorite and Under combo. The team side line has gone up a half a point from -6 to -6.5 for the Niners. The total has dropped a point from 44.5 to 43.5. What's up with that? I'm guessing it's Mike Singletary. If you respect a head coach, and he's defensive-minded, then the money comes in on his team and the Under. If he's a favorite, you get the relatively odd favorite and Under combination. These were relatively small moves though, with more sentiment on the total play. It's hard for sharps to lay points with bad teams. Most sharps passed on the dog because St. Louis doesn't look like they're trying any more. The few who bet swallowed hard and laid 6 points with a bad team hoping the new coach changes the losing mindset. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]ARIZONA AT SEATTLE: Early money on Arizona -1.5 here, lifting the line up to -2.5 with extra juice or -3 with reduced juice. Arizona won at St. Louis two weeks ago in a similar divisional road favorite spot. The sharps were impressed by that. Sure, the Cards didn't look very good this past Monday. But, Seattle rarely looks good ever. The total has dropped from 48.5 to 47.5. We're seeing a lot of totals go down this week even though scoring isn't going down across the league. That will be something to pay attention to. Arizona's clearly the sharp side here, but I don't expect any sharps to lay a field goal. They got in at the lower price. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]SAN DIEGO AT PITTSBURGH: Here we have another favorite and Under combination with a good defense. Pittsburgh opened at -4, and went up to -5 fairly quickly. San Diego hasn't looked good in so long that the sharps have definitely pegged them as a go-against team right now. Remember how badly San Diego played on prior trips out East too. The total has dropped from 44 to 42. I think we've seen a drop like that on every San Diego road trip. The offense just isn't doing anything in these games, and the sharps keep taking advantage of that. They did lose the Under in London, but have cashed most others. If San Diego really is as bad as they've looked the past month, then this line might need to be higher. Are they really that bad? [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]DALLAS AT WASHINGTON: The early money has come in on home underdog Washington, as +2.5 has dropped to +1.5. This is also in the teaser window. Really, only Indianapolis and Washington are in the sweet spots right now, so those teams will be in a lot of teasers this weekend. The total has come WAY down from 46 to 42.5, in the biggest move of the week. Some of that is weather related. And, there's some though that Tony Romo will be rusty from his long layoff as he finally returns to the lineup. There's also a bit of a hedge there. If Washington loses, it's probably because they don't score many points (as you saw in the MNF loss to Pittsburgh). Smart way to play it if you think Romo is going to be rusty. If he plays well though, it's going to spike two different bets. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]CLEVELAND AT BUFFALO: Buffalo opened at -4 in this Monday Night game, and has been bet up to -5. That came on reports earlier in this week that the Browns players were calling each other quitters. There's nothing from recent Bills games to inspire confidence, so that has to be an anti-Browns move. The total dropped from 43 to 42. The early week forecasts weren't very pretty for Sunday and Monday, so we saw a lot of weather related drops. These guys played in a blizzard in Cleveland last year. I would expect to see a lot of game day action on this one once everyone has a chance to focus on the game. If the public hits the home favorite (as they often do), sharp money will come in on the Browns probably at +6. [/FONT]
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,949
Messages
13,575,546
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com