Quote Prussen: Reading this conversation it is obvious that I got something totally wrong, and that was my decision to try and have a rational discussion with Bilbal despite my previous experiences with him. ................................................................Maybe he is talking about Obama was a Senator from Illinois & most of John Deere & Caterpillar jobs are in Illinios....Thats all I can think of...If thats not whats bugging Bribal then I dont know what is.
My offer, again, is for YOU to find YOUR own answers and not ask ME to do it for YOU.
The fact that you have nothing, nothing now, nothing three days ago, and nothing three days from now is NOT my problem, ever. It is YOUR problem, it will always be YOUR problem no matter how much effort you put in to making it seem like it's MY problem.
So unless you find something legitimate about Caterpillar that you can contribute, move along.
The fact that you have nothing, nothing now, nothing three days ago, and nothing three days from now is NOT my problem, ever. It is YOUR problem, it will always be YOUR problem no matter how much effort you put in to making it seem like it's MY problem.
So unless you find something legitimate about Caterpillar that you can contribute, move along.
This is your "offer"? How much more pathetic can you get? I don't need answers. The fact that there is "nothing now, nothing three days ago and nothing three days from now" that contradicts my original point clearly indicates that neither you nor anyone else in this forum has any argument against my point. Case closed.
Your childish attempt to reverse the sides is so lame, even you should be able to do better.
He does not care about Cat because no Cat plants in Germany.....Just like you might not care about Mercedes Benz because no plants in US that I know of though BMW has a plant in SC maybe thats what he meant but I see the whole thing as a senseless arguement probably based on a misunderstanding of some sort anyway thats my 2 cents worth.
In general, this statement is perfectly true. Unlike many people I'm aware that I'm not omniscient.
However, in the current context this statement is as nonsensical as most of your other posts. As far as I can see your only 'significant' reply to my original point was "Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act", which obviously does not have anything to do with my point that Caterpillar's CEO did not actually contradict Obama. And for your assertion that I was wrong to make this point in the first place you offered no explanation at all.
So if you really mean to imply that you gave sensible explanations then you apparently have lost all contact to reality.
Since you have basically admitted that you are just way too dumb to ever understand, I'll let you know why you were wrong. Because in post #9 you were arrogant enough to accuse others of not being objective, so I drag your dumb ass up and down this fucking thread rubbing your hypocritical refusal to be more objective with your own small minded view and we suddenly find that you don't care enough to do so and we're left, time and fucking time again, with your pathetic arguments of convenience from your bag of touche<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 10"><meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 10"><link rel="File-List" href="file:///C:%5CUsers%5Csa%5CAppData%5CLocal%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Verdana; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1593833729 1073750107 16 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --></style>. Your act is old, you are fooling nobody, go away.
As I said in my last post, you appear to have lost touch with reality. 
But I admit you impress me. Rarely has someone managed to make so many posts with so little substance. Not to mention your countless unfounded assertions, of which your last post is an extreme example:
When did I do that? You may want to actually read and try to understand what people write (your failure to do so is probably the main reason why this 'interesting' conversation started in the first place).
No, you don't. Your post is beside the issue, like all your other ones.
Several things in this sentence.
1. Pointing out that it's advisable to read an article in its entirety before making a judgement is not arrogant.
2. You have dragged my ass?
3. You have rubbed in my hypocrisy despite being unable to explain where I have been hypocritical?
4. In what respect is my view small-minded, how could it be more objective and how have I refused making it so? (I guess to answer these questions you'd have to know what my view is, which apparently you don't even if I have spelled it out for you several times)
In what respect is the fact that I have no special interest in Caterpillar inconsistent with the point I made in post# 9?
Name just one "pathetic argument of convenience". Actually I didn't even need many arguments as you provided almost nothing that needed to be responded to with counter arguments.
Read: No, I cannot sensibly answer your questions so I try ad hominem attacks in an atempt to conceal it.
Bilbal, I admit I'm surprised that you won't let this thread die despite the punishment you take. Can't let someone else have the last word, eh?
But I admit you impress me. Rarely has someone managed to make so many posts with so little substance. Not to mention your countless unfounded assertions, of which your last post is an extreme example:
When did I do that? You may want to actually read and try to understand what people write (your failure to do so is probably the main reason why this 'interesting' conversation started in the first place).
No, you don't. Your post is beside the issue, like all your other ones.
Several things in this sentence.
1. Pointing out that it's advisable to read an article in its entirety before making a judgement is not arrogant.
2. You have dragged my ass?
3. You have rubbed in my hypocrisy despite being unable to explain where I have been hypocritical?
4. In what respect is my view small-minded, how could it be more objective and how have I refused making it so? (I guess to answer these questions you'd have to know what my view is, which apparently you don't even if I have spelled it out for you several times)
In what respect is the fact that I have no special interest in Caterpillar inconsistent with the point I made in post# 9?
Name just one "pathetic argument of convenience". Actually I didn't even need many arguments as you provided almost nothing that needed to be responded to with counter arguments.
Read: No, I cannot sensibly answer your questions so I try ad hominem attacks in an atempt to conceal it.
Bilbal, I admit I'm surprised that you won't let this thread die despite the punishment you take. Can't let someone else have the last word, eh?
As I said in my last post, you appear to have lost touch with reality.
But I admit you impress me. Rarely has someone managed to make so many posts with so little substance. Not to mention your countless unfounded assertions, of which your last post is an extreme example:
When did I do that? You may want to actually read and try to understand what people write (your failure to do so is probably the main reason why this 'interesting' conversation started in the first place).
No, you don't. Your post is beside the issue, like all your other ones.
Several things in this sentence.
1. Pointing out that it's advisable to read an article in its entirety before making a judgement is not arrogant.
2. You have dragged my ass?
3. You have rubbed in my hypocrisy despite being unable to explain where I have been hypocritical?
4. In what respect is my view small-minded, how could it be more objective and how have I refused making it so? (I guess to answer these questions you'd have to know what my view is, which apparently you don't even if I have spelled it out for you several times)
In what respect is the fact that I have no special interest in Caterpillar inconsistent with the point I made in post# 9?
Name just one "pathetic argument of convenience". Actually I didn't even need many arguments as you provided almost nothing that needed to be responded to with counter arguments.
Read: No, I cannot sensibly answer your questions so I try ad hominem attacks in an atempt to conceal it.
Bilbal, I admit I'm surprised that you won't let this thread die despite the punishment you take. Can't let someone else have the last word, eh?
If anyone was wondering what I meant by "argument of convenience", this is what I meant.
Even if this is true, which is highly doubtful, none of this changes the fact that Preussen is kicking your fucking ass up one side of this thread and down the other, and making you look like a fool in the process.
I don't think I've read any of your posts before this thread, but I know now that you are not someone to be taken seriously.
Last edited:
