over ther course of Tiger's career, Tiger hasn't had Arnie, Trevino, Watson, Player, Ballesteros, and Norman to deal with....
Tiger has shown glimpses of greatness in the last couple of months. I know he got smoked in some of his early matches in the Preseident's Cup. But came back and pretty much dominated in his single match. And he had a third place finish in the Australian Open before winning his own tournament in Florida. It may not have been a great win, but it had to be a big confidence booster that he knows he's back on the right track. Unlike what many seem to think, Tiger's game isn't going to come together all at once. There will be weeks his long game sucks but his short game is working, and vice versa. Whether he can put it all together and win some of these bigger tournaments is all speculation. But given that he's over his injuries for now, which was my biggest concern, I would be afraid to bet against him. Especially on the courses that he has an eye for.
Yea, you are right, he hasn't had those guys to compete against, he has had a hell of a lot more guys to compete against that are not using back yard grown swings to compete.....golf is global now, it used to not be nearly as much. The game, like everything else in the world has evolved.....more people play, the competition is better and the field are stronger. Either way tiger has won 94 time (and counting) against the best competition and most players playing in the world....that's pretty fucking good for a guy that lost his swing and his putting stroke!
yea all of those global guys still are not Norman, Ballesteros, Player, and forgot to mention Faldo.. If you think the last 15 years of golfers are better then the HOF's I mentioned with inferior equipment, you must be high bro......
If you honestly think the foreign players during the Nicklaus era are better than the foreign players today, you are the one who must be high. Just take a look at the World rankings right now. 7 of the top 10 including the top 4 are all foreign players.Yes, there was a few top notch foreigners back then, but not even close to the quantity of top foreign talent nowadays...yea all of those global guys still are not Norman, Ballesteros, Player, and forgot to mention Faldo.. If you think the last 15 years of golfers are better then the HOF's I mentioned with inferior equipment, you must be high bro......
You obviously don't know enough about golf to make that statement. Nicklaus has 18 majors, Tiger 14.. Nicklaus has alot more 2nd and 3rd place major finishes too.. Nicklaus had alot more success in Ryder cup... Nicklaus also had more HOF's to deal with..
If you honestly think the foreign players during the Nicklaus era are better than the foreign players today, you are the one who must be high. Just take a look at the World rankings right now. 7 of the top 10 including the top 4 are all foreign players.Yes, there was a few top notch foreigners back then, but not even close to the quantity of top foreign talent nowadays...
Who is to say they are or are not as good as they are today? Especially ppl that also talk about how good the"young guys" of today are supposedly. Those guys back then may have been great, but they were great against a hell of a lot less competitiors than there are today! And your high if you think otherwise
yea all of those global guys still are not Norman, Ballesteros, Player, and forgot to mention Faldo.. If you think the last 15 years of golfers are better then the HOF's I mentioned with inferior equipment, you must be high bro......
last couple of years talent pool has increased.. That being said these newbies weren't around when Tiger was dominating... just saying.. an occasional Ernie showing and Mickelson isn't quite alot of competition IMO
Tiger just kept everybody down back then....nobody could touch him...
You will never see another golfer as dominant as Tiger was....he kept a lot of other guys out of the winners circle...Byron Nelson won something like 11 straight tournaments; only guy to come close to that was Tiger...
Tiger's era was like larry Holmes era ..... You guys act like I don't think Tiger WAS great.. I have him 2nd behind Jack, is that a disgrace or something ?
I will remember this statement the next time you start another thread concerning Tiger's place in the world rankings. Apparently his is the only one that matters to you...