Do you buy Organic / Free Range /Grass Fed /No GMO's food

Search

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
Monsanto Protection Act Signed By Obama, GMO Bill Written By Monsanto Itself Signed Into Law

March 30th, 2013 by James Ayre

The Monsanto Protection Act, essentially both written by and benefitting Monsanto Corporation, has been signed into law by United States President Barack Obama. The infamous Monsanto Corporation will benefit greatly and directly from the bill, as it essentially gives companies that deal with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and genetically engineered (GE) seeds immunity to the federal courts, among other things. The bill states that even if future research shows that GMOs or GE seeds cause significant health problems, cancer, etc, anything, that the federal courts no longer have any power to stop their spread, use, or sales.



There are of course arguments to be made that not enough research has been done yet to accurately determine the effects that GMOs have on human and animal health (though the research already done should make you stop and think). This bill sidesteps that completely though, and simply states that even if there are problems, that the federal courts can no longer do anything about it. And this bill is now law, thanks to President Obama and the U.S. Congress.

Some other interesting things to keep in mind:
– The bill was apparently written by freshman Sen. Roy Blunt in collusion with Monsanto, with them helping to craft the exact language of the document.
– “The Center for Responsive Politics notes that Sen. Blunt received $64,250 from Monsanto to go towards his campaign committee between 2008 and 2012. The Money Monocle website adds that Blunt has been the largest Republican Party recipient of Monsanto funding as of late.”
– Many members of Congress were apparently unaware that the “Monsanto Protection Act” was a part of the spending bill that they were voting on.
– Obama had no problem signing it into law (not really a surprise, he’s been rather soft on GMO policy).
– The bill will only remain in effect for a limited time, but it’s a bad sign. With the ease that this bill passed, it’ll be interesting to see what future bills look like.


As the Daily News asks, “Who’s more powerful, the world’s largest producer of genetically modified crops or the U.S. government?”
“On Tuesday, Pres. Obama inked his name to H.R. 933, a continuing resolution spending bill approved in Congress days earlier. Buried 78 pages within the bill exists a provision that grossly protects biotech corporations such as the Missouri-based Monsanto Company from litigation.”

“In light of approval from the House and Senate, more than 250,000 people signed a petition asking the president to veto the spending bill over the biotech rider tacked on, an item that has since been widely referred to as the ‘Monsanto Protection Act.'”

“But Obama ignored [the petition],” as the IB Times notes, “instead choosing to sign a bill that effectively bars federal courts from being able to halt the sale or planting of GMO or GE crops and seeds, no matter what health consequences from the consumption of these products may come to light in the future.”

GMOs, while they may cause problems for human health, are primarily a problem for other reasons, mostly to do with crop/genetic diversity and overly complex industrial systems. And also the fact that they often don’t even work the way that they are “supposed” to.
When taken in context though, GMOs are really just another in a long line of environmentally damaging practices that people have done for short term gain/profit. From the large-scale deforestation of the world’s old-growth forests, to sustenance farming, to modern imported-fertilizer/pesticide/herbicide/fossil-fuel dependent industrial agricultural, the trend has been consistent, GMOs are just another in that line of attempts to temporarily maintain/raise crop yields. Regardless of the type of agriculture or the location, there are limits to how long any land can remain productive, applying imported fertilizers, or utilizing GMOs, only provides, at best, a temporary halt to the land’s transition to non-productive “wasteland”, and to desertification.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
I wish food companies were required to list EVERYTHING.

Why not?


This has nothing to do with conspiracy or any of that other nonsense .

It has to do with knowledge and accountability.



Some of you people get all stupid every time the government comes up with some new requirement like it's part of some new world order .
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
government allows companies like Monsanto to poison you, they take money from them and pass laws to protect them and then they market drugs (which is almost every commercial it seems) to help fix it. What a business model.

gmo-map.jpg
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
Vaccination of newborns is way down from just 20 years ago because some idiot with no proof said vaccines cause autism.

Now problems that were almost no longer existant in the USA like measles or starting to make a big comeback.

The alarmist always think the sky is falling.
If anything it's falling on them
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
Vaccination of newborns is way down from just 20 years ago because some idiot with no proof said vaccines cause autism.

Now problems that were almost no longer existant in the USA like measles or starting to make a big comeback.

The alarmist always think the sky is falling.
If anything it's falling on them

Because GMO's isn't an ingredient, and there's nothing factual to say that its poison. You got it the other way around, putting a warning label on GMO foods is like putting a warning label on Vaccinations because of autism. It's the sky is falling crowd that want warning labels on GMO foods. The thing is, Organic foods are already labeled voluntarily, and just about everything else has been genetically modified in some way.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
Because GMO's isn't an ingredient, and there's nothing factual to say that its poison. You got it the other way around, putting a warning label on GMO foods is like putting a warning label on Vaccinations because of autism. It's the sky is falling crowd that want warning labels on GMO foods. The thing is, Organic foods are already labeled voluntarily, and just about everything else has been genetically modified in some way.


Like I said label everything.
Knowledge is power
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
Like I said label everything.
Knowledge is power

So you think there should be warning labels on vaccinations because some people think they are poison? That would only turn more people into alarmist, because they'd think if it's safe why is there a warning label?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,617
Tokens
I understand what RC is saying though. Basically GMO is so widespread and vague that just labeling something GMO is no different than putting on the label "This is from Steve in Iowa"
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
I understand what RC is saying though. Basically GMO is so widespread and vague that just labeling something GMO is no different than putting on the label "This is from Steve in Iowa"

Exactly we'd be better off passing a law making it mandatory for non-gmo foods to label their foods as non-Gmo. But that's already happening, and that's not want the alarmist want. The alarmist want food to labeled the other way so they can say "see if it was safe why do we have to label it?"
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
5 Myths That GMO Companies Want You To Believe

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/04/27/5-myths-that-gmo-companies-want-you-to-believe/



why are so many countries banning GMO's and the seeds used? Where there is smoke there's fire. There have been many findings actually that have linked gmo's to things like gluten allergies and sicknesses due to long and short term intake of gmo's. You will see more and more as time goes on. One day, there will be a need to create another GMO to try and fix all the damage they are doing today. That means more money for someone.

Why is Monsanto protected against legal action by the US government?

Monsanto scientists won't even drink or let their own family drink milk from US cows because of the injected hormones they are continuously poisoned with. Monsanto and the US government will pretend that the world would starve without gmo's but facts say that there is more than enough food produced every year to feed the planet even with several billion more inhabiting Earth.

Why is Monsanto protected against legal action by the US government?

Here's is what I believe. I believe that Monsanto is similar to the FDA (the largest drug dealer in the world). Monsanto and the GMO's they are producing and poisoning people will continuously make people ill every year. And every few years when the body cannot handle the increased poisons, new illnesses will develop. That is where new drugs will need to be invented to cure these gmo illnesses. Its a vicious cycle of lies and deceit to make a selected few, and their shareholders, billions and billions.

Create a problem, exempt the company from any legal action, fix the problem.

945778_1178647572274952_585223636_n.jpg



9d4b04bd1f5383f3d354ab67b95bd51a.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
10,180
Tokens
GMO's were introduced in 1995. As a result a MASSIVE amount of glyphosate has infiltrated our food supply. We're the test tube, :). Genetically some can handle some cannot. Collateral damage? ha!!!! .

Glyphosate is applied to cotton, corn, sugar beet, canola and soya crops. If your diet is derived primarily from said sources, then it's safe to say your body genetically better be adaptive.... :).


here's a terrific paper. Enjoy the read.

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/glyphosate/NancySwanson.pdf



sadly the very old and very young are often more susceptible to disease expression. Food choices are critical, especially those with CHRONIC disease. Sadly, USA feels giving its citizens the knowledge of whether a food product has or has not GMO is not important-- they got your back, :)


from said article;


'Since GMOs were introduced into the food supply the rate of chronic health conditions among childrenin the United States increased from 12.8% in 1994 to 26.6% in 2006, particularly for asthma, obesity,and behavior and learning problems. The rate of chronic disease in the entire U.S. population has beendramatically increasing with an estimated 25% of the U.S. population suffering from multiple chronicdiseases.'

sad



since ethically its not possible to run a long term study proving/disproving GMO's potential harm in humans. however........ Perhaps we can have some volunteers? Who's on the heavy GMO diet? shall we ask FDA officials and Mosanto board if their children are in? ......:)
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,617
Tokens
'Since GMOs were introduced into the food supply the rate of chronic health conditions among childrenin the United States increased from 12.8% in 1994 to 26.6% in 2006, particularly for asthma, obesity,and behavior and learning problems. The rate of chronic disease in the entire U.S. population has beendramatically increasing with an estimated 25% of the U.S. population suffering from multiple chronicdiseases.'

Is this because the food is GMO or is it because it is processed, sugary, fat with low nutrient content?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
The thing that I find funny about these things is how it's usually divided upon partisan lines. Democrats will use unscientific methods to discount GMO's and it's all good, but if a Republican uses unscientific methods to discount climate change, that same democrat will call him a loon.
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
The thing that I find funny about these things is how it's usually divided upon partisan lines. Democrats will use unscientific methods to discount GMO's and it's all good, but if a Republican uses unscientific methods to discount climate change, that same democrat will call him a loon.
That's like when someone once said "the customer's always right" when we all know that's bullshit. If something is true scientifically, then 100% of scientist would agree. GMO's have been proven by scientists to be dangerous and causing cancer, birth defects and a whole bunch of other nasty things. It isn't a liberal or a conservative issue (or it shouldn't be) but people will try a deflect it to appear that way.

Simply put, if you put poison into a plant in order to kill the bugs that eat that plant and then allow that same poison filled plant sold and to be eaten then ..... (you can fill in the rest)

You don't have to be a scientist or an expert in anything whatsoever to understand that's not a good idea. If you can't see it, then there is no possibility anyone can get it through to you.
 
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
6,813
Tokens
Organic lettuce. That's about it as I am trying to go on a meat free diet. I need to shed a couple. Currently 6'5" about 230. The girl that cuts my hair bought a couple chickens for the eggs. Kinda interesting investment. I think she said they lay a couple eggs a day each but their shelter looks like it cost a pretty penny.
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
Organic lettuce. That's about it as I am trying to go on a meat free diet. I need to shed a couple. Currently 6'5" about 230. The girl that cuts my hair bought a couple chickens for the eggs. Kinda interesting investment. I think she said they lay a couple eggs a day each but their shelter looks like it cost a pretty penny.
speaking of chickens ... 160 million per week in the USA!

 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
That's like when someone once said "the customer's always right" when we all know that's bullshit. If something is true scientifically, then 100% of scientist would agree. GMO's have been proven by scientists to be dangerous and causing cancer, birth defects and a whole bunch of other nasty things. It isn't a liberal or a conservative issue (or it shouldn't be) but people will try a deflect it to appear that way.

Simply put, if you put poison into a plant in order to kill the bugs that eat that plant and then allow that same poison filled plant sold and to be eaten then ..... (you can fill in the rest)

You don't have to be a scientist or an expert in anything whatsoever to understand that's not a good idea. If you can't see it, then there is no possibility anyone can get it through to you.


Scott if you want to eat non-GMO stuff more power to you, put into your body only the things you want. I love having choices, and I would never want to take that choice away. I eat a lot of organic stuff too.
:toast:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,827
Messages
13,573,602
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com