Do you believe Michael Scott?

[JoeContrarian]

9 undecided? hno:

Wow! Phaedrus always did have a way with the written word.

 

[tiznow]

Not sure which is funnier...The guys who voted they are sure YES or the guys who voted they are sure NO.

ope:

 

[Willie99]

Not sure which is funnier...The guys who voted they are sure YES or the guys who voted they are sure NO.

Hey, who said anything about being "sure"?

I'm a strong lean no.

WTF, this is a gambling forum, do I need to explain this stuff?

 

[tiznow]

well i kinda read it as a sure answer

i guess you could interpret whatever way

the question was poorly phrased

i saw it as....

do you believe the feds conclusions to the case AKA no

do you believe michael scott's conclusions AKA yes

or are you unsure...

that's kinda how i interpreted this particular poll

 

[quantumleap]

Hey, who said anything about being "sure"?

I'm a strong lean no.

WTF, this is a gambling forum, do I need to explain this stuff?

Willie, you don't have to make this pick a lean. It won't go on your running record.

:nohead:

 

[Brooklynbomber]

nobody wants anything to do with those CIA/Drugs posts.....shit including me

I bet I could wrap that shit into MS's thread and the mfer would become epic

not interested

 

[TotalRecall]

People stopped doing things on their own along time ago...

The Operation or the Project this or that is now in play Joe.

Takes the individual right out of the damm equation.

He only exists in the newspaper and telivision lies.

 

[Railbird]

Joe your lsoing by a touchdown right now 14-7. Nobody trusts the gov, everybody knows what SCUMBAGS they are. THERE GIG IS UP.

 

[DarrylParsons]

well i kinda read it as a sure answer

i guess you could interpret whatever way

the question was poorly phrased

i saw it as....

do you believe the feds conclusions to the case AKA no

do you believe michael scott's conclusions AKA yes

or are you unsure...

that's kinda how i interpreted this particular poll

If you want to be very precise you would use probabilities in the question.

Which probabilities would be the most sensible for the choices?

I'd say 0-25%, 25%-75%, and 75%-100%.

With that interpretation there is no need to do a Barman-type chicken dance for choosing the "extremes".

Another possible interpretation is 0-0.01%, 0.01%-99.9%, and 99.9%-100%, but then it's not Barman but myself who does a big LOL for interpreting it that way because that's just gay IMO.

 

[DarrylParsons]

9 undecided? hno:

Wow! Phaedrus always did have a way with the written word.

So Michael Scott = Phaedrus is your working hypothesis then? I know it's hard for your psyche to accept that there might be two guys here who own you in categories you consider important, but ya gotta admit it's a distinct possibility.

 

[Romanowski]

Phaedrus is way smarter then --(for tartari) -- this MIchael Scott

I don't believe his story but what is more unbelievable is the thread has 5000 + views, lol

somebody workin the refresh button :lolBIG:

 

[Willie99]

Phaedrus is way smarter then --(for tartari) -- this MIchael Scott

I don't believe his story but what is more unbelievable is the thread has 5000 + views, lol

somebody workin the refresh button :lolBIG:

actually Romo, refer to the thread about 950 viewers in the political forum.

If you google "CIA murder anthrax" you'll see the Rx is the 2nd hit following Diggs. The Diggs right up refers to the Rx and was obviously written by Michael Scott, talking about how his thread proves without a doubt the CIA mudered the scientist. Michael using the Rx for some agenda, and Joe C is the one that saw this all along.

 

[Willie99]

actually Romo, refer to the thread about 950 viewers in the political forum.

If you google "CIA murder anthrax" you'll see the Rx is the 2nd hit following Diggs. The Diggs write up refers to the Rx and was obviously written by Michael Scott, talking about how his thread proves without a doubt the CIA murdered the scientist. Michael using the Rx for some agenda, and Joe C is the one that saw this all along.

at 9AM no less

:lol:

 

[xpanda]

I thought this thread was about "The Office."

Nevermind.

 

[barman]

DARRYL P: So Michael Scott = Phaedrus is your (MarkLContrarian's) working hypothesis then? I know it's hard for your psyche to accept that there might be two guys here who own you in categories you consider important, but ya gotta admit it's a distinct possibility.

:lol:

 

[barman]

I thought this thread was about "The Office."

Nevermind.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MKP5WQsmFxs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MKP5WQsmFxs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

[ScottL]

And the whole time I was sure Michael Scott was the ghost of Jinn Rikki

:biggrinin

 

[Willie99]

Did Michael get whacked? :think2:

 

[JoeContrarian]

Did Michael get whacked? :think2:

He gone.

 

[JoeContrarian]

So Michael Scott = Phaedrus is your working hypothesis then? I know it's hard for your psyche to accept that there might be two guys here who own you in categories you consider important, but ya gotta admit it's a distinct possibility.

You're entitled to your opinion but I don't think anyone in here has ever seen me full throttle.

One thing I can't stand is link wars, which is what Michael Scott was trying to sucker me into.

In any case, he left because the coward couldn't stand the heat.

:toast: