this game reminds me of the giants vs new england superbowl where the whole world was all over tom brady and company only to have the giants win...BUT, Denver wins this one..i know how good seattle d is but there is 2 qb's that your never going to stop no matter how good the d is and thats payton manning and tom brady...you might slow them down but your not shuting em down, denver will score in this game and the d is all seattle has going for them, seattle just cant seem to score or put together any real good back to back drives..2 of the scores against san fran were just through the ball up and see who comes down with it...not going to get away with that against denver, they actually rank in the top against giving up big plays over 10yds, denver doesnt have the best d but they just dont give to many big plays and IMO, seattle will have to get some big plays down field to stay in this game.
So, you mean to say the Seahawks offense won't get away with some plays made against a much superior defense in SF?
I think people are forgetting the caliber of defenses this Seattle team has been going up against the last 4 or 5 weeks. Seattle's offense is being undervalued along with their defense...Talking about getting away with things...Peyton won't be able to complete those flutter passes versus this secondary.
I think people are forgetting the caliber of defenses this Seattle team has been going up against the last 4 or 5 weeks. Seattle's offense is being undervalued along with their defense...Talking about getting away with things...Peyton won't be able to complete those flutter passes versus this secondary.
It's not a discussion of whether he would say it affected his play. It's an analysis of whether or not that injury had an impact on how he played. If you can watch the game and say that injury had zero impact on the way he played, then you are blind. It took away, or at least limited, his ability to run which happens to be what sets him apart from other qbs.
Again, I don't care if RG3 would say he wasn't at 100%. That is not a factor in whether or not his injury had an effect on his playstyle. Again what RG3 says does NOT matter. It's an analysis of the game. And in real-time, NOBODY waited til the game ended to say he looked injured. He started the game looking HEALTHY. He got re-injured and everyone watching the game could see he was not the same.
Everyone watching the game would say he wasn't 100% during the game but not being 100% is not why they lost the game. And he wasn't re-injured until the final minutes of the game. Nobody said his injury impacted the game when they went up 14-0 early. Why is that?
RGIII doesn't play D. He didn't give up 24 points.
books continue getting tons of Denver money. and now all the squares have arrived in Vegas and everyone's loading up on Denver -2.5 even with heavy juice.
sharps were all over Denver +1.5 at opener and have moved the line 4 points already. now they're salivating for Seattle +3 which will come shortly (but probably won't last long).
books need Seattle in the worst way possible, as both sharps and squares are all over Denver.
sharps were all over Denver +1.5 at opener and have moved the line 4 points already. now they're salivating for Seattle +3 which will come shortly (but probably won't last long).
books need Seattle in the worst way possible, as both sharps and squares are all over Denver.
