eekster, I'm having a tough time keeping up with your incoherent rant in this thread.
Are you giving the States credit or bashing us?
A bit tipsy chap?:grandmais
You want to remember that eek is Scotch and thinks wearing a skirt and a cute feathered bonnet is cool. The only cool Scotchman I ever knew was Mel Gibson.
We are loosing the tenets of our culture and this is not good in my opinion. This here election is dividing the people and this not be good.
:cripwalk::cripwalk::cripwalk:
So I guess you never heard of the British Empire, eh barman?
Comparing US control in Iraq to Hitler's ability to control his conquested countries is like comparing apples to, er, rat meat. It's about the will of control.
First the rat meat. Hitler clearly demonstrated that he had the will to torture and annihalate. If you weren't a blond haired, blue eyed Arian you were expendable and in very brutal ways. There would be few dissidents in the face of such inhumane policy. Hitler clearly had the will to control.
Now the apples. Since WW II the US, thanks largely to powder puff policy makers like yourself, engages in wars of containment. They have no imperialist designs in Iraq and in fact are wasting our soldier's lives and our money in an effort to give a healthy and vibrant Iraq back to a people who are too stupid to accept the gift.
Despite eek's lack of gratitude, without our intervention, Europe would look very different today.
Democracy is worthless...The British "empire" post-1800 consisted of Great Britain and a handful of African and southeast Asian 4th world countries. As each obtained even a modest measure of "civilization", they each in turn shrugged off the British mantle and the Brits sensibly retreated knowing full well they could not maintain control through violent military reprisal.
The mid 20th century European community would not have allowed Germany to maintain any more than a vestige of control for perhaps a few years as they methodically created revolution on multiple fronts. It's perhaps fanciful to imagine the horror of a Nazi-controlled continent, but it's delusional and ignores the strength of the human spirit which has been fully exposed to democratic principles.
<HR style="COLOR: #e1dfdf" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->
From Laura Ingraham
"Make no mistake: Barack Obama's speech in Berlin's Tiergarten park was one of the most revealing and, frankly, terrifying moments of the campaign so far. We witnessed a man who may very well be the next president of the United States APOLOGIZE to a bunch of foreigners for his own country's failings! He told the crowd of 200,000 that he addressed them "as a fellow citizen of the world" and then dropped this bomb: "I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we've struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We've made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions."
Apparently lost on Obama and the crowd was the incredible irony that a Nazi flag would be flying over Berlin at this very moment if it weren't for the sacrifices made by the United States and our allies in WWII; hundreds of thousands of Americans died to liberate Europe and prevent the spread of tyranny around the world.
The crowd, of course, was enthralled with the speech. But there's a very simple reason why Obama's been received like a rock star everywhere he goes in Europe: the European people have no desire to see America remain the world's number one power!
Here's the bottom line: The United States can't afford a commander-in-chief who travels to other countries with his hat in his hand and begs for some understanding. We need a president who will stand up for America, not apologize on her behalf. And if Obama had no qualms about delivering this speech to the European public, what's to stop him from doing it in private with Ahmadinejad in Iran?
Say goodbye to America, the superpower; say hello to America, the good global citizen."
The desperation is becoming comical.:missingte