Call For Regulation Of DFS (Daily Fantasy Sports) Grows Amid Shady Insider Trading Possibility At DraftKings

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
The borderline false advertising by these guys is also making this a bigger deal than it might be..

Borderline false advertising? No worse than beer commercials, car commercials, or fucking McDonald's.

No worse than commercials for the state lottery. No worse than organized religion. No worse than the housing/mortgage industry.

All advertising is false advertising. It's pretty much the point of advertising. The truth doesn't need a 30-second commercial.

Oh no, my 100% bonus only clears at one-percent! How was I supposed to know? I mean, other than reading the terms & agreement. And who can be bothered with reading in 2015........we're too busy with click, click, click, snapgram, LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
[h=1]Fantasy online sports betting getting closer look by Florida[/h] Tuesday, Oct. 13, 2015

Powerful forces are gathering to make sure that Florida doesn’t regulate online fantasy sports gambling.
If you’ve turned on a television set during the past month, you’ve probably seen ads by FanDuel and DraftKings, two online betting companies that have saturated the airwaves at the start of the National Football League season.


These gambling juggernauts spent $26.1 million in ads during the first week of the season alone, and have outpaced beer and automobile advertising in recent weeks.
All to get millions of Americans to imagine that they can, on any given week, pick a collection of players around the league that will perform better than any other collection. Daily leagues. Instant cash payouts. Testimonials from big winners.
The New York-based FanDuel and the Boston-based DraftKings provide websites that host these wagers, which range in entry fees from $1 to $250 — with about 10 percent of the fees going to the companies.
With millions of armchair football experts wagering every weekend, each of them spending an average of nearly $500 a year, these companies are each worth an estimated $1 billion.
So where does Florida come in?
Well, it’s legal in Florida to wager online on fantasy football. For now.
But this year, Florida’s gambling pact with the Seminoles, a multi-year deal that allows the tribe to run blackjack and other casino table games in exchange for a $1 billion payment to the state, expires.
That means Florida’s lawmakers will review the state’s entire gambling picture, an always contentious collision of cross purposes. And one of Florida’s leading voices in gambling legislation, Sen. Rob Bradley, R-Fleming Island, who chairs the Florida Senate Regulated Industries Committee, has started raising questions about fantasy sports wagering.
“They are promoting a product that looks a lot like sports betting,” Bradley told The Miami Herald.
Fantasy sports gambling is illegal in just five states: Montana, Washington, Louisiana, Iowa, and Arizona.
But this month, an insider-trading-like scandal hit these fantasy sports companies. An employee of DraftKings used the inside information he had on betting patterns to make a bet on the rival FanDuel site and win $350,000.
It has prompted investigations by the attorneys general in New York and Massachusetts. And a federal grand jury in Tampa has been empanelled to look into daily fantasy sports wagering in Florida, according to Florida gambling law attorney Daniel Wallach.
Florida used to take a dim view of fantasy sports betting.
In 1991, an advisory opinion of then-State Attorney Gen. Bob Butterworth concluded that Florida law “prohibits the operation and participation in a fantasy sports league whereby contestants pay an entry fee for the opportunity to select actual professional sports players to make up a fantasy team whose actual performance statistics result in cash payments from the contestants’ entry fees to the contestant with the best fantasy team.”
But the federal Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act of 2006 was passed, a heavily lobbied law that specifically excluded fantasy sports from banned online gambling under the theory that fantasy sports betting relies more on skill than chance.
It has been a questionable, but lucrative justification.
By virtue of that exception, the gambling in fantasy sports has blossomed, creating a nation of transformed sports fans who watch games not to see which team wins, but to see how well the members of their fantasy rosters are doing.
This has increased television ratings for professional sports, especially football, and prompted the leagues to become business partners with these gambling websites.
Two months ago, FanDuel, DraftKings and the Fantasy Sports Trade Association started hiring some of the most influential lobbyists in Florida, even though no legislation is pending in the state. It’s a sure sign that when Florida’s gambling future is hashed out, fantasy sports will have some seats at the table.
George Orwell would find this fitting.
I found myself looking back at the words of Orwell, who in his novel, “1984,” created a Dystopian society where gambling played a key role in maintaining order.
“So long as they continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance,”Orwell wrote. “Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern … Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbors, films, football, beer and above all, gambling filled up the horizon of their minds.”
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
Federal Trade Commission could look into DFS sites after controversy

David Purdum, ESPN Staff Writer

United States Sen. Robert Menendez and Congressman Frank Pallone have asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate daily fantasy sports operators who allowed employees with access to nonpublic information to compete on rival sites.

"Allowing employees of fantasy sports websites with access to nonpublic information to participate in online fantasy games, even if the games are operated by other fantasy sports companies, could give those employees an advantage akin to insider trading," Menendez and Pallone stated in an Oct. 6 letter to the FTC. "Therefore, we also ask the FTC to investigate whether this constitutes an 'unfair or deceptive practice' as defined in Section 5 of the FTC Act.


"We believe that fantasy sports should be legal and subject to appropriate consumer and competitive protections."
The FTC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Pallone and Menendez held a news conference at noon Tuesday outside of MetLife Stadium to discuss fantasy sports.
"Daily fantasy sports is an industry crying for consumer protection," Pallone said. "Despite its explosion in popularity and the allegation of 'insider trading' by employees of daily fantasy sports operators, the industry is operating in a void within the legal structure -- without any regulation or the necessary transparency. The backdrop of MetLife Stadium calls attention to the fact that the same professional sports leagues and teams that support and invest in fantasy sports betting are opposed to and serve as a barrier to professional sports wagering. The illegality of sports betting has forced it to function almost exclusively through organized crime, and the lack of regulation of daily fantasy sports has left the industry open to unfair practices and consumer vulnerabilities. Both need to be taken out of the shadows and should be legal and regulated."

Added Menendez: "I have serious concerns about whether these online fantasy sports leagues can police themselves. This is about fairness and ensuring a level playing field for fantasy sports fans. There's a lot of money at stake, and these sites are drawing in tons of players. These players should know they aren't being duped. I think Congress needs to look into this and see whether by exempting fantasy sports from the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, we've created a regulatory vacuum that leaves consumers out in the cold."

Daily fantasy operators DraftKings and FanDuel have been under fire over the past week after a DraftKings employee published data revealing which players were included on the most rosters for an NFL DFS contest. The same weekend, the employee finished second in a contest on FanDuel, winning $350,000.

DraftKings has denied that the employee had access to the data prior to submitting his winning lineup and, along with FanDuel, has since banned employees from participating in public fantasy contests for money.
Menendez and Pallone said the reports of employees playing and winning on other sites "raise serious questions about the integrity of these online fantasy sports websites, and it raises the question of whether there are sufficient consumer and competition safeguards to protect the integrity of these online games."

Pallone, a ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has also requested a congressional hearing to examine the "relationship between professional sports and fantasy sports and to review the legal status of fantasy sports and sports betting."
The hearing is expected to be granted, but as of Oct. 13, it has not yet been scheduled.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
<header class="article_header module" style="margin: 0px 10px 6px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 10px; vertical-align: baseline; box-sizing: border-box; position: relative; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; background: 0px 0px;">[h=1]FBI, Justice Department Investigating Daily Fantasy Sports Business Model[/h][h=2]FBI agents have been contacting customers of DraftKings to ask them about their experiences[/h]

</header>By BRAD REAGAN and
DEVLIN BARRETT

<time class="timestamp" style="margin: 0px 0px 4px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 13px; vertical-align: baseline; font-family: 'Whitney SSm', sans-serif; display: block; line-height: 2.2rem; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); background: 0px 0px;">Oct. 14, 2015 7:33 p.m. ET</time>The U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are probing whether the business model of daily fantasy sports operators violates federal law, according to people familiar with the matter.



http://www.wsj.com/articles/fbi-jus...aily-fantasy-sports-business-model-1444865627





 
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
1,998
Tokens
DK & FD were idiots for letting their employees play on other sites. If daily fantasy survives the mess that they put themselves in, I can't imagine there not being changes in how these games are run.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
2,486
Tokens
I doubt they survive it.... who in their right mind will allow this kind of gambling and not sports or poker lol.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,617
Tokens
Borderline false advertising? No worse than beer commercials, car commercials, or fucking McDonald's.

No worse than commercials for the state lottery. No worse than organized religion. No worse than the housing/mortgage industry.

All advertising is false advertising. It's pretty much the point of advertising. The truth doesn't need a 30-second commercial.

Oh no, my 100% bonus only clears at one-percent! How was I supposed to know? I mean, other than reading the terms & agreement. And who can be bothered with reading in 2015........we're too busy with click, click, click, snapgram, LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

+1

If people thought they had some great opportunity to turn $20 into 1M then that is on them.

Anyone with a brain should know there is risk involved.

Is E-Trade or Fidelity false advertising too? How come they don't show people on the commercials that have gotten crushed by the market?
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
8,229
Tokens
Borderline false advertising? No worse than beer commercials, car commercials, or fucking McDonald's.

No worse than commercials for the state lottery. No worse than organized religion. No worse than the housing/mortgage industry.

All advertising is false advertising. It's pretty much the point of advertising. The truth doesn't need a 30-second commercial.

Oh no, my 100% bonus only clears at one-percent! How was I supposed to know? I mean, other than reading the terms & agreement. And who can be bothered with reading in 2015........we're too busy with click, click, click, snapgram, LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

tell it to the Feds and fbi lolololol
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,515
Tokens
Walmart tanked 10% yesterday. Ten percent! For a supposedly safe/stable company.

Made me think of this, cough cough, definition..........

"Gambling can be defined as wagering money on an uncertain outcome."
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
These guys are in in for a long battle...


[h=1]DFS Class Action Lawsuit Tracker[/h]

In the wake of the DraftKings data leak story that started gaining mainstream attention in early October, plaintiffs have started filing class action lawsuits against DraftKings and FanDuel in a variety or jurisdictions.
Here is a look at the active lawsuits, along with their status and a link to the filings:

StateStatusLawsuit
New York 1Filed (Story)PDF
IllinoisFiledPDF
LouisianaFiled (Story)PDF
MassachusettsFiledPDF
New York 2Filed (attorney, Alan Milstein)PDF
New York 3FiledPDF

<thead style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</thead><tbody class="row-hover" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</tbody>

The biggest issue that the lawsuits must overcome is the terms of use that players agree to at both DraftKings and FanDuel. In them, users agree to waive their class action rights, and must undergo arbitration to settle disputes.
The class action lawsuits will likely be combined at some point down the road, but for now, they exist as separate suits.


http://www.legalsportsreport.com/dfs-class-action-lawsuit-tracker/
 

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
878
Tokens
CRZGI2nUEAAQnwR.png


Wouldn't be surprised if more states don't start sending cease and desist letters sooner rather than later.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
House Chairman Latest Congressman To Eye Daily Fantasy Sports Hearings


Dustin Gouker, October 17, 2015 19:47 PDT

The calls for a Congressional hearing into daily fantasy sports have grown in the past two weeks, to the point that at least one occurring seems to be inevitable.
At this point, at least three different committees in Congress appear to be interested in a hearing, with a high-level Republican representative the most recent to get into the mix.

The latest rumblings on a Congressional hearing

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform wants to hold hearings on fantasy sports in November, according to a report from the New York Post.
There has been no official word on this front, but if the chairman of a committee wants a hearing, it’s almost certain to happen.
Interestingly, Chaffetz is also the sponsor of a bill that seeks to ban online gambling in the U.S., the Restoration of America’s Wire Act. Chaffetz is also running for Speaker of the House.

Other members of Congress that want action on DFS

Chaffetz is far from alone in wanting the federal government to take a look at daily fantasy sports:

  • Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) was the first to call for a hearing (more below), as well as being the most vocal.
  • Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) has joined with Pallone to call for action.
  • Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nevada) continues to speak on DFS in saying regulation is needed.
  • Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has asked the Federal Trade Commission to look into the DFS industry.
  • Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) requested a hearing.
  • Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev) asked for hearings, as well.



In the beginning, New Jersey makes call first

The first request for a hearing came in September — weeks before the DraftKings data leakmorphed into a story covered by the mainstream media.
The request was made by Pallone, the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. At the time, some observers chalked it up as a media ploy to draw attention to his state’s ongoing battle to legalize and regulate sports betting. And, obviously part of the strategy was to call attention to the fact that you can’t bet on sports very many places, while daily fantasy sports remained an unregulated activity.
Here are some of his statements from a press release in which he announced that he sent a letter to committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee Chairman Michael C. Burgess (R-TX):
“Anyone who watched a game this weekend was inundated by commercials for fantasy sports websites, and it’s only the first week of the NFL season,” said Congressman Pallone. “These sites are enormously popular, arguably central to the fans’ experience, and professional leagues are seeing the enormous profits as a result. Despite how mainstream these sites have become, the legal landscape governing these activities remains murky and should be reviewed.”

“Fans are currently allowed to risk money on the performance of an individual player. How is that different than wagering money on the outcome of a game?”noted Pallone.
Also back in September, Upton said a hearing was likely to happen.


Pallone remains on offensive

After the story picked up momentum in October, Pallone continued to beat the drum for a hearing:

 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
Last month at a conference at Babson College near Boston, a DraftKings founder, Paul Liberman, said barring employees from playing could make it difficult to retain talent.
“We have some people who make significantly more money off of our competitors’ sites than they do working for DraftKings,” he said.

It blows my mind that a founder of the company would say that publicly in the current climate. Wow, somebody needs a PR manager
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
It blows my mind that a founder of the company would say that publicly in the current climate. Wow, somebody needs a PR manager



Not only that, but they also recently said this with a bit of sarcasm (digging themselves deeper)


“It is entirely predictable that the government would follow up on the misleading reports about our industry." -- DraftKings in WSJ story
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
That comment wasn't made in the current climate to be fair.

Should have never been said period.
Too many people who don't understand the subject will take that the wrong way.
Idiotic comment
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,617
Tokens
Yeah most people can't predict the future. Obviously he didn't know that would be the big shoe to drop and became a huge issue.

It's hardly significant either way in the grand scheme of things.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,222
Tokens
Don't outlaw fantasy sports; regulate them
October 19, 2015



The following editorial appears on Bloomberg View:

In the past few weeks, the fantasy sports business learned it was facing an FBI probe, an investigation in New York, a ban in Nevada, inquiries from Congress, multiple lawsuits, and a raft of alarming questions about the misuse of confidential data. It also had its most prosperous weekend ever.

That's a paradox familiar to enthusiasts of slot machines and lotteries: Gambling is treacherous, and it's also fun. Daily fantasy sports -- clearly a form of gambling, despite what practitioners say -- are no exception. They should be subject to oversight just as other legal forms of wagering are. Regulators should ensure that the games are run transparently and with integrity. And then gamblers should be free to lose money on them fair and square.

The now-booming websites -- such as DraftKings and FanDuel, on which contestants pay to select a roster of players and earn points based on their real-life performance -- owe their existence to a loophole. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, passed by Congress in 2006, banned most online gambling but carved out an exemption for fantasy sports sites. At the time, such sites typically allowed players to assemble teams and compete over the course of a season. The daily version -- which started in 2009, and more closely resembles traditional gambling -- exploits this exemption.

As a result, the industry is conducting an inadvertent experiment in legalized sports gambling -- one that should now inform a larger debate. After all, perceptions of sports gambling are evolving. Most voters support legalizing it, and at least six states are mulling legislation on the topic. Even NBA Commissioner Adam Silver wants to legalize it.

The fantasy experiment that Congress has unintentionally enabled should help determine if that's a good idea. But it will work only if regulators -- state and federal -- put some sensible rules in place to protect consumers.

Proprietors of daily fantasy sites should be licensed and regulated much as casinos are, to ensure their operations are transparent. The technology they use -- including algorithms that determine the "price" of each player -- should be subject to audits. So should their safeguards against fraud and the misuse of inside information by employees. Geolocation tools, which can block players in states that prefer to outlaw the contests, should be mandatory. And rules about what technology players can deploy to their advantage should be spelled out more clearly. Actually, pretty much everything these sites do should be spelled out more clearly.

More important, the companies should be required to take measures to protect gambling addicts from themselves. Because they operate online, with payment information linked to each user, they should be able to verify identities, enforce limits on losses and use data patterns to recognize problem gamblers. State regulators could mandate other protective measures based on the National Council on Problem Gambling's standards. And fantasy advertising during sports broadcasts -- an enticement to children and addicts alike -- should be banned.

Which raises a final, crucial problem: the unholy financial alliance between these sites and professional sports leagues. As a matter of common sense, Congress should bar leagues from investing in fantasy gambling sites, displaying their ads or having any other business relationship with them.

Even with such precautions in place, fantasy sports gambling may boost rates of addiction and related ills. And the riches at stake may begin to corrupt real-life sports. Policy makers should be alert to these dangers, and proceed with caution. That's pretty good advice for gamblers, too.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,811
Messages
13,573,542
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com