Your query was responding to my mention of female voters aged 18-45.
My response.....not sure how many view Clinton as "their leader", but when posed in direct contrast with Donald Trump I think we could see 65% or more.
Pretty difficult to get over 65% on most any political question due to our diverse population, but for that demographic - Clinton vs Trump seems as close a shot as any
Yes, my query was responding to that mention. The reality is young women prefer a 74 year old white man to Mrs. Clinton. The fact that they despise Trump does not mean that they like Clinton. We will see if their hatred of Trump is enough to get them to vote for Clinton. For the record, I think it will.
Still waiting for your answer on Lanquel, Broman.
good grief....well however 'enlightened' I might be now, how about I confess to being far less so back in 2009?
There are numerous things I said within this forum back in 2009 that I would not say now. In that year I took far too seriously what was going on at the Rxforum in general and certainly overrated the importance of what was transpiring daily in the PolyForum.
This may shock you, but seven years ago I honestly thought there were topics which required me to 'set other people straight'.
In hindsight, it's a frankly embarrassing stance.
I have since found it a bit more socially useful to allow others to think and do whatever they think is best for them. It's also a massive relief to no longer desire that anyone Change their thinking in order for me to feel better.
hope this suffices for ya
do you remember the debate about giving DC two Senate seats?
two more democratic for life locks, although that discussion seems to have been tabled for a while now
always trying to rig the game
You should be.....imagine thinking that dems are trying to re-draw lines that favor their party......as repubs stand by and try to make things even and fair without giving themselves any advantage. Without me informing people......some of you might actually think that's what's going on.
be glad I let you know what's going on.....if you repeat Willie type posts outside of here.....people are gonna laugh. But you are welcome.
way too much credit my friend, they always vote for one thing and one thing only, their own special interest (be it labor unions, teacher protection, welfare, funding for their cause, funding for themselves and making somebody else pay)
I'm talking about the base that puts them over the top, there are always exceptions (and some just vote because abortions get them off
)way too much credit my friend, they always vote for one thing and one thing only, their own special interest (be it labor unions, teacher protection, welfare, funding for their cause, funding for themselves and making somebody else pay)
I'm talking about the base that puts them over the top, there are always exceptions (and some just vote because abortions get them off
Sure. What I was saying to mantis re his post of how hard it is to embrace Hillary was just an example of how they rally the troops. There wasn't much love for Gore or Kerry, so the rallying cry was first, "Not Another Bush," and in 2004, "Get Him Out!" For 2008 it was all about the love for Obama. Then in 2012 the Pubs ran an old man who made a poor VP choice. This year it will be, "No To Trump!" or some other BS like, "Vote For Hillary! At Least She's Experienced!" Whatever it takes with these people.
