If cops know that for example in St Louis that blacks commit 92% of the homicides, 93% of robberies, 87% of aggravate assault... and
because of that, they tend to profile blacks for stops - is that institutional racism? Or is it just (possibly) illegal profiling?
Maybe it's just question of definitions...
<header class="post-header" style="margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: 22.4px; font-family: "PT Serif", serif; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">The Color of Crime: St. Louis
Posted on December 18, 2011 by Hunter Wallace in American South, Crime, Diversity, Dixie,Missouri, Negroes, Race Realism, Race Relations // 15 Comments
</header>Missouri
In St. Louis, African-Americans are 49.2 percent of the population, but are responsible for 92 percent of homicide, 78 percent of rape, 93 percent of robbery, 87 percent of aggravated assault, and 82 percent of burglary.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/12/18/the-color-of-crime-st-louis/
No. Thats bullshit. Everyone has 'issues'. One must use self control. Past experience does not excuse acting like an animal. Civility is what separates us from animals. Act domesticated and get treated like a man.
Take for example them dogs you fight in your cousins garage . If the dog behaves he don't get beat. When he acts out he gets whipped.
Dont act out=don't get whipped. A fucking dog can learn this simple thing. Why couldn't alton sterling? Was he not as smart as a dog?
How do you just chalk terrible results like that up to a means to an end though?
More blacks are getting pulled over than whites as a % of population and they are possessing less contrabrand. So these are unsuccessful stops, they're not working and they're fueling extreme biases in the justice system (since some blacks will have contraband and have to then deal with that whereas whites get away with it) Big reason you are like 3-4x more likely to get arrested for weed if you are black than white.
STL is its own animal but the results do show this happens in other areas of the state as well.
There is no argument. Blacks commit violent crimes at a much higher rate than whites. There is no profiling or racism
If blacks would stop committing so many crimes, the police would be less likely to pull them over.
If you go to the 5th page of the executive summary on the link, the result are pretty bad and clearly show biases in the justice system.
Is it intentional or not is for one to debate and deconstruction, but it certainly is something that is going to fuel outrage.
https://ago.mo.gov/docs/default-source/public-safety/2015vehiclesstops-executivesummary.pdf?sfvrsn=2
So blacks who aren't committing crimes and just living their life need to get pulled over at disproportionately higher rates than whites?
Just collateral damage for the other people of color committing more crimes?
Tim Scott the senator from SC needs to get pulled over 6 times? I'm not an expert on criminal justice and crime fighting techniques, but this seems extremely inefficient and sub-optimal to me. Basically closing your eyes hoping to get lucky.
He obviously was motivated by his perception that cops are unjustly killing blacks. Same exact shit as Dallas. What's religion have to
do with that?
Smarted up boy. Stop regurgitating nonsense
So blacks who aren't committing crimes and just living their life need to get pulled over at disproportionately higher rates than whites?
Just collateral damage for the other people of color committing more crimes?
Tim Scott the senator from SC needs to get pulled over 6 times? I'm not an expert on criminal justice and crime fighting techniques, but this seems extremely inefficient and sub-optimal to me. Basically closing your eyes hoping to get lucky.
Tim Scott?
A) i guarantee theres more to it,he probably have illegal tint lol
B) i guarantee there are 50 white guys nationwide who have been pulled over 6 times in the past year
Using 1 example from 1 version to excuse murder is irresponsible.