Not being one to take the side of the book, but areef did indicate the line they SAY they "meant" to post was -500/+300.
If that is true, and I have now way of knowing, didn't look at any of those lines anywhere, then their position may be
-line was a mistaken post (human error)
-bad line as it was 0ver 100% off what they meant to post
Didn't see the usuall mumbo jumbo in the rules about bad lines,
only rule #10 Casablanca Sportsbook™ reserves the right to "add, delete or change" house wagering rules and payoffs odds.
Doesn't really help you areeef. Sorry.
What was the other side of their listed line. You said +605 what was the "-"?
If that is true, and I have now way of knowing, didn't look at any of those lines anywhere, then their position may be
-line was a mistaken post (human error)
-bad line as it was 0ver 100% off what they meant to post
Didn't see the usuall mumbo jumbo in the rules about bad lines,
only rule #10 Casablanca Sportsbook™ reserves the right to "add, delete or change" house wagering rules and payoffs odds.
Doesn't really help you areeef. Sorry.
What was the other side of their listed line. You said +605 what was the "-"?