Barbara Bush- a Very Wise Lady

Search

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Bush never uttered the phrase "Mission Accomplished" anywhere.

Ever.

Idiot.

Pardon me, Idiot.
Bush_mission_accomplished.jpg
. What he said was "Bush stated at the time that this was the end to major combat operations in Iraq." Whether he actually uttered the words "Mission Accomplished" or not is totally irrelevant, but of course something an idiot like you would cling to.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Of course you can't name an example of a war where 1,000 people dying would be "major causaulties"

Again, this dipshittedness is about what I expected.

I bet you're concerned as hell about 4 people tragically dieing in Benghazi, but you don't think losing over 1,000 American, and many times that innocent Iraqi's in a needless war is "major casualties". You fit right in with the Clueless Partisan Hacks here.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
"Whether he actually uttered the words "Mission Accomplished" or not is totally irrelevant, "

:):)

Yes, "irrelevant" because you posted something that was laughably untrue.

Here is what he said in the speech:

We have difficult work to do in Iraq. We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous. We're pursuing and finding leaders of the old regime who will be held to account for their crimes. We've begun the search for hidden chemical and biological weapons, and already know of hundreds of sites that will be investigated. We are helping to rebuild Iraq where the dictator built palaces for himself instead of hospitals and schools.
And we will stand with the new leaders of Iraq as they establish a government of, by and for the Iraqi people.
The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done and then we will leave and we will leave behind a free Iraq.

=====================

See, you dumb little liar, he never said "mission accomplished" nor did he say the whole thing was over.

 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Nice qualifier, liar. You have no idea what I would have supported at the time. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91651

I didn't qualify anything.

There were no "warnings" at all.

You wouldn't have supported Bush doing anything, because your criticisms, to the extent these dumbshit lies would be taken seriously, are mindless drivel. You would not have supported anything Bush said about terrorism and in fact would have accused him of lying.

Just like you are now.

Any suggestion to the contrary is laughable and preposterous.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
By the way, you gotta love when a silly ignorant liberal goes with the "Bush was warned about 9/11" meme:


A secret intelligence document prepared for President Bill Clinton in December 1998 reported on a suspected plot by Osama bin Laden to hijack a U.S. airliner in an effort to force the United States to release imprisoned conspirators in the 1993 World Trade Center attacks.

The one-page declassified version of the President's Daily Brief dated Dec. 4, 1998, contains chilling information -- gleaned by the CIA from several sources -- indicating that al Qaeda was working with U.S.-based operatives of its deadly ally, the Egyptian group Gama at al-Islamiyya, in the purported hijacking plot.

...
The 1998 document is "the most important PDB about hijacking published before 9/11," Zelikow said. The Aug. 6, 2001, PDB prepared for President Bush mentioned 1998 intelligence concerning a plot by bin Laden "to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of 'Blind Sheik' Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists."

The 2001 PDB said intelligence officials "have not been able to corroborate" the plot reports from 1998.


The 1998 PDB is titled: "Bin Laden preparing to hijack U.S. aircraft and other attacks." It was declassified, with redactions, by the White House last Monday at the Sept. 11 panel's request. The text of the 1998 PDB was read to a reporter by an administration official who had access to the declassified document.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58615-2004Jul17.html

---------------------

Don't worry, you will still bitterly cling to the meme.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
I bet you're concerned as hell about 4 people tragically dieing in Benghazi, but you don't think losing over 1,000 American, and many times that innocent Iraqi's in a needless war is "major casualties". You fit right in with the Clueless Partisan Hacks here.

Hey idiot:

The Benghazi attack killed civilians.

That isn't war.

1,000 deaths are not "major casualties"

You're a dope.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
I didn't qualify anything.

There were no "warnings" at all.

You wouldn't have supported Bush doing anything, because your criticisms, to the extent these dumbshit lies would be taken seriously, are mindless drivel. You would not have supported anything Bush said about terrorism and in fact would have accused him of lying.

Just like you are now.

Any suggestion to the contrary is laughable and preposterous.

Total lie. There were numerous warnings. The fact that the administration didn't consider them such, or follow up on them, doesn't mean there weren't any. You are spouting nonsense, because you have no clue what I would have or wouldn't have supported in 2001. Read some Richard Clarke. It'll educate you, if you care to be educated.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Hey idiot:

The Benghazi attack killed civilians.

That isn't war.

1,000 deaths are not "major casualties"

You're a dope.
Sorry that you consider Human life so callously. 1000+ Deaths in a war is major casualties in my book. Even moreso when there shouldn't have been 1, in a False war that should have never been started. You're a party hack fool.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
"Whether he actually uttered the words "Mission Accomplished" or not is totally irrelevant, "

:):)

Yes, "irrelevant" because you posted something that was laughably untrue.

Here is what he said in the speech:

We have difficult work to do in Iraq. We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous. We're pursuing and finding leaders of the old regime who will be held to account for their crimes. We've begun the search for hidden chemical and biological weapons, and already know of hundreds of sites that will be investigated. We are helping to rebuild Iraq where the dictator built palaces for himself instead of hospitals and schools.
And we will stand with the new leaders of Iraq as they establish a government of, by and for the Iraqi people.
The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done and then we will leave and we will leave behind a free Iraq.

=====================

See, you dumb little liar, he never said "mission accomplished" nor did he say the whole thing was over.


Here's what he said, AGAIN. Bush stated at the time that this was the end to major combat operations in Iraq.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Sorry that you consider Human life so callously. 1000+ Deaths in a war is major casualties in my book. Even moreso when there shouldn't have been 1, in a False war that should have never been started. You're a party hack fool.

They are just sick people. Add Acebb to the list. It's like this place is a magnet for nut jobs.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Total lie. There were numerous warnings. The fact that the administration didn't consider them such, or follow up on them, doesn't mean there weren't any. You are spouting nonsense, because you have no clue what I would have or wouldn't have supported in 2001. Read some Richard Clarke. It'll educate you, if you care to be educated.

I love that.

"Follow up" on them.

Really, by doing what, exactly?

Again, this is just mindless drivel.

I love the rote repetition of 'Richard Clark' as if you have any idea about the topic.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Here's what he said, AGAIN. Bush stated at the time that

@):mad:

You don't understand the terms being used.

This isn't the first time.


You have not one utter clue what constitutes "major combat operations" or what the words mean.
Again, you're a dope.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Sorry that you consider Human life so callously. 1000+ Deaths in a war is major casualties in my book. Even moreso when there shouldn't have been 1, in a False war that should have never been started. You're a party hack fool.

"Your book" is empty.

Whether or not you consider 1,000 deaths "major causalities" in a war is irrelevant because you've never served in the military, have no relevant education or knowledge of the matter, and so your opinion is the equivalent of a 5th grader talking about their favorite candy.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Total lie. There were numerous warnings. The fact that the administration didn't consider them such, or follow up on them, doesn't mean there weren't any. You are spouting nonsense, because you have no clue what I would have or wouldn't have supported in 2001. Read some Richard Clarke. It'll educate you, if you care to be educated.

If on August 7th, 2001 President Bush held a news conference saying he is ordering the extensive search of young, middle-Eastern males, at airports you would have totally gone along with it.

Really, you would have.

What is even funnier about this silly bullshit is that President Clinton was warned multiple times about this and of course the 9/11 hijackers entered America and began their training during his Presidency.

And you were totally super upset with Clinton about that.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Wow,. Acebb kicking some major libtard ass in this thread too.

Comedy Gold.

Guesser the sewer rat getting called what I've said he is all along: A dumb ass dope.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
If on August 7th, 2001 President Bush held a news conference saying he is ordering the extensive search of young, middle-Eastern males, at airports you would have totally gone along with it.

Really, you would have.

What is even funnier about this silly bullshit is that President Clinton was warned multiple times about this and of course the 9/11 hijackers entered America and began their training during his Presidency.

And you were totally super upset with Clinton about that.

You have zero knowledge of what I would or would not have gone along with. You have zero knowledge of how I felt about Clinton. You are just a partisan hack fool, who "guesses" about things, and spouts off on them as facts. You fit right in to the sick cult down here. What do you think of sending Ricin to Politicians you disagree with? I'm hoping you're against it, so I'm hoping you'd have no problem being repulsed, and strongly repudiating someone who is in favor of that behavior? But if you truly want to fit in down here, you have to say nothing about it because one of your cult members supported it. Lets see if you have the courage to go against the cult. Perhaps you can be THE ONE.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Wow,. Acebb kicking some major libtard ass in this thread too.

Comedy Gold.

Guesser the sewer rat getting called what I've said he is all along: A dumb ass dope.

The cheerleading bitch is here. Must mean Guesser is whooping ass.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Guesser the sewer rat calling someone else a "party hack?"

ROFL, COMEDY GOLD!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
You have zero knowledge of what I would or would not have gone along with. You have zero knowledge of how I felt about Clinton. You are just a partisan hack fool, who "guesses" about things, and spouts off on them as facts. You fit right in to the sick cult down here. What do you think of sending Ricin to Politicians you disagree with? I'm hoping you're against it, so I'm hoping you'd have no problem being repulsed, and strongly repudiating someone who is in favor of that behavior? But if you truly want to fit in down here, you have to say nothing about it because one of your cult members supported it. Lets see if you have the courage to go against the cult. Perhaps you can be THE ONE.

You're calling someone else a party hack?

STFU, you're the biggest fucking liberal hack in here. Dumb ass.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,944
Messages
13,575,431
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com