Reminder
The Rx or Ace-Ace do not ask you to pay us for his plays. All we ask is you deposit small amounts of funds into your own account at one of our sponsors. The funds are yours to wager with as you see fit and all profit goes to you. The Rx does not get a penny of these deposits, all we get is credit for sending Rxers to our sponsors with small deposits which helps us retain them as sponsors and stay in business by retaining our sponsors.
Thanks, wilheim
The Rx or Ace-Ace do not ask you to pay us for his plays. All we ask is you deposit small amounts of funds into your own account at one of our sponsors. The funds are yours to wager with as you see fit and all profit goes to you. The Rx does not get a penny of these deposits, all we get is credit for sending Rxers to our sponsors with small deposits which helps us retain them as sponsors and stay in business by retaining our sponsors.
Thanks, wilheim
Hello Ace, when you use to post the sportsinsights percentages example:
# bets------spread--------ML------Parlay--------OU
Miami 44765------ 40%--------37%------42%--------70%
Seattle 60%--------63%------58%--------30%
how do I read the Over Under %? is it top team (Miami) over at 70 % and
. . . . is it bottom team (Seattle) under 30 %
the top team is always the Over %'s
the bottm team is always the Under %'s
are all the line service's sportsinsights, sports options and don best are they all read the same way as the example above? :think2: thanks Ace
# bets------spread--------ML------Parlay--------OU
Miami 44765------ 40%--------37%------42%--------70%
Seattle 60%--------63%------58%--------30%
how do I read the Over Under %? is it top team (Miami) over at 70 % and
. . . . is it bottom team (Seattle) under 30 %
the top team is always the Over %'s
the bottm team is always the Under %'s
are all the line service's sportsinsights, sports options and don best are they all read the same way as the example above? :think2: thanks Ace
Okay Ace I have a question; with all the math and other indicators pointing to San Diego scoring an average of 28 points, and I'm sure its probably higher when they play at home, how do they lay an egg on such an important game to an inferior opponent? That game should of scored 51 points but for some odd reason the Chargers decided not to show up. Is this just a fluke or was there some indicators that this might have happened? What did I miss on this game going over? Completely frustrated as I always seem to be on the wrong side lately and I want to straighten this out!
every week I pick each game on paper...than I break each one down...I had SD....but it was 7th on my list and I was lucky not to bet it!!
flat games happen...any sunday another team can win.....7 favors vs 8 dogs....Oakland was one of those Dogs...there was no way I would have better Oakland....the goal is always to find the best plays.....this week its the same story...sd-7 over KC....will not be playing that game
Thank You for the reply, you certainly put in the work and deserve all the rewards! I think my biggest down fall is that I put too much emphasize on the "value" or "motivation to win" factor of the game for the team that really needs to win. Like yesterday's Bears/Lions game. Bears had all the reasons to win to help their position in the standings. The Lions on the other hand have no really value on the win because their toast at this point in the season and threw a 3rd string QB out there. Same thing with the Chargers, they're climbing back into the hunt and needed to win at home to get a step closer to the Division lead. The Raiders do also but have been going through QB's it seems every other week. Either way you expect the highest scoring team in football to at least score 2 TD's at home.
I gotta stay away from this mentality and just stay with the numbers on paper, like quitting a bad habit! Please keep posting your insights, I'm very competitive and want to learn how to win! I've been back reading your other threads to try and catch up, consider me a student and please tell me if I'm annoying you with my questions, sincerely, Bob
I gotta stay away from this mentality and just stay with the numbers on paper, like quitting a bad habit! Please keep posting your insights, I'm very competitive and want to learn how to win! I've been back reading your other threads to try and catch up, consider me a student and please tell me if I'm annoying you with my questions, sincerely, Bob
NFL futures
Hey Ace...hope I'm not out of line by asking you your opinion about futures this late in the season. I was glancing at them and one caught my eye, although the juice is pretty brutal.
2010 NFL - Will the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Reach the Playoffs?
All wagers have action
Yes
+250
No
-325
Tampa is 7-5, and behind the Giants/Eagles, Bears/Packers, and both Saints and Falcons. Tampa has 3 winnable games remaining, but I think it will be EXTREMELY difficult for them to make the playoffs. Do you have any opinion about this, or any other futures?
Thanks
Hey Ace...hope I'm not out of line by asking you your opinion about futures this late in the season. I was glancing at them and one caught my eye, although the juice is pretty brutal.
2010 NFL - Will the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Reach the Playoffs?
All wagers have action
Yes
+250
No
-325
Tampa is 7-5, and behind the Giants/Eagles, Bears/Packers, and both Saints and Falcons. Tampa has 3 winnable games remaining, but I think it will be EXTREMELY difficult for them to make the playoffs. Do you have any opinion about this, or any other futures?
Thanks
