Are you for/against gay marriage?

[vitterd]

Of course you think they're silly, you are a far left liberal that parrots everything that the DNC tells you to believe, no surprise there.

They are silly because they make no sense...not because of the party I vote for. You really think that two adults consenting on a relationship is comparable to one adult forcing a child to have sex? Cmon man....step out of the 50's and step into at least the 90's. Lol.

 

[JustinCruise]

They are silly because they make no sense...not because of the party I vote for. You really think that two adults consenting on a relationship is comparable to one adult forcing a child to have sex? Cmon man....step out of the 50's and step into at least the 90's. Lol.

+1

 

[akphidelt]

Lol. I read thru a bunch of threads there today. Reading russ, ace, dave and joe....is like stopping in a mental hospital. Complete idiots.

Hahahaha, that's pretty much exactly what it's like. Willie is going around claiming everyone loves him and he's better than all of us. Gas Man is claiming every single person in the medical industry hates Obamacare. We also went through a global warming convo which of course Acebb got "beclowned", lol. Guesser has been doing work on them. FesteringZit still is crabby all day, every day. It's still very entertaining what you can get them to say and how they can spin their lies.

 

[vitterd]

Hahahaha, that's pretty much exactly what it's like. Willie is going around claiming everyone loves him and he's better than all of us. Gas Man is claiming every single person in the medical industry hates Obamacare. We also went through a global warming convo which of course Acebb got "beclowned", lol. Guesser has been doing work on them. FesteringZit still is crabby all day, every day. It's still very entertaining what you can get them to say and how they can spin their lies.

Sounds about right. Gas man talks to 5 rednecks in bumblefuck mississippi and he thinks that represents the entire world. Acebb is wacked out his mind and russ is still connecting imaginary dots.

 

[RenoChazz]

If you're against gay marriage, then don't have one. It's really that simple.

 

[MikeB]

There are plenty of NAMBLA "couples" out there where both sides claim that their man/boy relationship makes them both happy. Who are you to tell them no?

Really?

You're gonna make that jump? I expected more from you.

I don't even know where to start responding to that statement.

 

[MikeB]

I didn't. Mike said that whatever makes people happy, they should be able to do, so I'm saying using that argument, bestiality should be legalized, and
actually encouraged by society.

Clearly I should have qualified my statement with strict parameters.

Please take the spirit of my statement rather than looking for little loopholes.

Again, I expected more from you. I say that with all due respect because (IMO), you are one of the more articulate posters on the board and usually make fairly to mostly compelling points to back yourself up.

 

[festeringZit]

Clearly I should have qualified my statement with strict parameters.

Please take the spirit of my statement rather than looking for little loopholes.

Again, I expected more from you. I say that with all due respect because (IMO), you are one of the more articulate posters on the board and usually make fairly to mostly compelling points to back yourself up.

I think it's a reasonable point. Bestiality doesn't hurt anyone, why should it be illegal?

People argue that prostitution is a victimless crime, but studies have shown that that is far from the truth.

The homosexual lifestyle (especially MSM) is the same way. Homosexuals have far higher cases of mental and physical health issues, and it could very well be argued that a lot of the money we throw at
AIDS should be thrown at cancer, and other diseases.

 

[akphidelt]

I think it's a reasonable point. Bestiality doesn't hurt anyone, why should it be illegal?

People argue that prostitution is a victimless crime, but studies have shown that that is far from the truth.

The homosexual lifestyle (especially MSM) is the same way. Homosexuals have far higher cases of mental and physical health issues, and it could very well be argued that a lot of the money we throw at
AIDS should be thrown at cancer, and other diseases.

You completely missed their point. The qualification is two consenting adults. Beastiality is one consenting adult and an animal that can't talk and probably eats its own poop. Pedophilia is one consenting adult and an individual that is deemed to not have enough maturity to consent to such relationships.

Even schizophrenics and other mentally deranged adults are allowed to get married in America.

So instead of making up bullshit arguments just say it like it is, you are against it because religious reasons. I'm against it also, but unlike you I'm as objective as it gets. I can understand others arguments without trying to spin them in to pure bologna.

 

[MikeB]

FZ, stop with the pedophilia and beastiality talk. You know very well that we are only talking about gay marriage and not this other crap.


JC, although I agree with you on the marriage equality point you make, I really would like for you to qualify your "gay gene" statement or retract it.

 

[vitterd]

You completely missed their point. The qualification is two consenting adults. Beastiality is one consenting adult and an animal that can't talk and probably eats its own poop. Pedophilia is one consenting adult and an individual that is deemed to not have enough maturity to consent to such relationships.

Even schizophrenics and other mentally deranged adults are allowed to get married in America.

So instead of making up bullshit arguments just say it like it is, you are against it because religious reasons. I'm against it also, but unlike you I'm as objective as it gets. I can understand others arguments without trying to spin them in to pure bologna.

That's what I don't understand...his reasoning for being against it borders on sheriff joe logic. Confused by his comparisons.

 

[festeringZit]

You completely missed their point. The qualification is two consenting adults. Beastiality is one consenting adult and an animal that can't talk and probably eats its own poop. Pedophilia is one consenting adult and an individual that is deemed to not have enough maturity to consent to such relationships.

Even schizophrenics and other mentally deranged adults are allowed to get married in America.

So instead of making up bullshit arguments just say it like it is, you are against it because religious reasons. I'm against it also, but unlike you I'm as objective as it gets. I can understand others arguments without trying to spin them in to pure bologna.

"I'm as objective as it gets"

Um, you are the biggest leftist ideologue in the Political Forum, the biggest troll - and on top of that you were voted the dumbest poster in there, so I'm not going to respond to your drivel. Mike on the other hand
is a respectable poster, and I will treat him as such.

 

[festeringZit]

FZ, stop with the pedophilia and beastiality talk. You know very well that we are only talking about gay marriage and not this other crap.


JC, although I agree with you on the marriage equality point you make, I really would like for you to qualify your "gay gene" statement or retract it.

You argued that it must be OK, because it makes two people happy. My point is, the happiness of an individual or two individuals should not dictate what society accepts as acceptable behavior.

I'm telling you, mark my words, it is a slippery slope, and now that we've opened the door to define marriage as two men (or two women), it's not going to stop there. Polygamy and incest will be next,
and there are arguments already being made for legitimizing pedophilia. I'm not just pulling this out of thin air.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...ychiatric-Association-Reclassifies-Pedophilia

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2013/04/05/democrats-pushing-new-law-to-legitimize-and-protect-pedophiles/

http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/270557/ - Is pedophilia Next?

Brazil allows for "civil union" of 3 people: http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/31/world/americas/brazil-polyfaithful-union/

 

[akphidelt]

"I'm as objective as it gets"

Um, you are the biggest leftist ideologue in the Political Forum, the biggest troll - and on top of that you were voted the dumbest poster in there, so I'm not going to respond to your drivel. Mike on the other hand
is a respectable poster, and I will treat him as such.

Any leftwing poster on this site will tell you I'm not a left wing ideologue, lol. You're just a troll.

 

[festeringZit]

Any leftwing poster on this site will tell you I'm not a left wing ideologue, lol. You're just a troll.

There's a reason why you were voted the dumbest poster in the poly forum, and you either tied for the lead, or were in 2nd place for the most annoying poster.

We both know you are the troll, so lets just leave it at that.

 

[akphidelt]

There's a reason why you were voted the dumbest poster in the poly forum, and you either tied for the lead, or were in 2nd place for the most annoying poster.

We both know you are the troll, so lets just leave it at that.

Being voted the dumbest poster by you guys was an honor. You are wrong about everything. Sheriff Joe even voted for me twice, lol. Great group of guys to associate with, lol. And yes, you are a troll with stupid beliefs that gay marriage will be a slippery slope to pedophilia and beastiality, lol. Crazy.

 

[festeringZit]

Being voted the dumbest poster by you guys was an honor. You are wrong about everything. Sheriff Joe even voted for me twice, lol. Great group of guys to associate with, lol. And yes, you are a troll with stupid beliefs that gay marriage will be a slippery slope to pedophilia and beastiality, lol. Crazy.

You might have a scintilla of credibility if you even knew how to spell "bestiality." You're just a spoiled, uneducated kid who is a legend in his own mind, and a fool in everyone else's.

 

[MikeB]

Well, my point was (and is) that if they are two consenting adults who are in a committed relationship, then it is my opinion that it should be allowed.

Who am I to stand in the way of their happiness?


Now let me ask you, what does more harm to the sanctity of a marriage? Two older ladies (or gentlemen) who decide to get married after decades together, or the guy in his thirties who is getting divorced for the third time?

BTW, I happen to know this very situation.

 

[festeringZit]

Well, my point was (and is) that if they are two consenting adults who are in a committed relationship, then it is my opinion that it should be allowed.

Who am I to stand in the way of their happiness?


Now let me ask you, what does more harm to the sanctity of a marriage? Two older ladies (or gentlemen) who decide to get married after decades together, or the guy in his thirties who is getting divorced for the third time?

BTW, I happen to know this very situation.

Two wrongs don't make a right. I'm not a fan of divorces either...

 

[akphidelt]

You might have a scintilla of credibility if you even knew how to spell "bestiality." You're just a spoiled, uneducated kid who is a legend in his own mind, and a fool in everyone else's.

Oh I'm sorry my iPhone didn't autocorrect bestiality, lol. I guess that means I don't have a point, hahaha! One of the more pathetic responses I've seen from you. A spelling error.