Are General & Shrink banned from RX

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
It's very simple...they can put all the spin on their being banned and sing until the cows come home.... There is NO WAY>>>NO HOW and NO POSSIBILITY....that this will help the Rx!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,267
Tokens
TRaider said:
good riddance !!!!! anyone who couldn't see that shrink was just using the rx for drama after announcing he was leaving until his new site opened is a fool. the rx is much better off without shrink being associated, its a shame the mods have to be left in the middle.obviously they dont want to say the exact reason why shrink was finally sent packing. i am assuming management finally stepped in and said enough.props for doing the right thing rx! general is just shrinks private pawn caught between a rock and a hard place , it isnt his fault.and lets not forget it was the shrink who sat back and watched while all the other websites tried to help the betpanam players.where was the shrink then? great guy!

I don't agree with your decision but i also didn't agree with you banning the biggest trouble maker in the history of sports betting forums who i just quoted. IMHO there is room for all the scammers and the troublemakers. Posters police these guys just like the Mods and were all better for it. It's not fair to say someones shit stinks when they are not allowed to defend themselves. And it's also foolish to pretend these people don't exist because there are other gambling forums and everyone knows it.

Shrink had some shady dealings and everyone knew it but like it or not he is an icon in this business and he did help some players. If anything this will help his new site more than hurt it. Just my two cents.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
511
Tokens
Chuck Sims said:
In the middle of two player disputes, SHRINK working on getting these guys paid, he is banned from The RX along with the General? You FOOLS!!! To indicate how horrible of a decision this is, look who is congratulating The RX for banning the SHRINK. Its the stooges from MajorWager that ripped The RX and SHRINK nonstop for having planned this attack on Royal. The same dopes that told MFG to just forget about his $25,000 that BetUs stole from him. Sad, sad day indeed.

Chuck,

What's your deal, man? 'Shrink working on getting these 'fools' paid'? He's extorting a book that doesn't owe this guy any money. For Christ's sake, have you heard the tapes? Oh, right.

Royal sucks with all of their slow pays, but it has nothing to do with this.

And i'm hardly a 'stooge' from MW. You don't leave this cave, but major and I don't exactly get along. Not exactly a newsflash to anybody with a pulse.

And I agree that MFG is owed money, if his account is accurate, which there is no reason to believe it isn't, and all this faith that 'Mike Foreman' will make it right is hilarious. He somehow always ends up at books where he has no say, no power and where he ends up on the front lines bullshitting the naive people on these forums. Whatever the case in that dispute, Betus is a 'shit book,' as you would say. Always has been.
 

"It's great to be alive and ahead by seven" Mort o
Joined
Feb 2, 2002
Messages
5,649
Tokens
Shrink and The General banned. WTF!! Next to get the ax will probably be Dante, Fish, and BucsFan. If that happens, I will be forced to vacate the premises. "So sad when good love goes bad." Everly Brothers LT
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
Shrink's and General's banning here....will ASSURE their new site to be a success, if it's a forum anywhere similiar to this. The only problem will be people like me finding it and then when the mass exits begin.....you tell me about business decisions.

friends close....enemies closer.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 1999
Messages
8,227
Tokens
Look I have been here almost as long as anyone on this site. And this site was created in the same manner that others have been created with a free enterprise spirit. No one wishes those guys any will ill, and if they are opening a new site, then that is great for them. Free enterprise,a nd on July 4th, that is what this country is based on.


BUT I CAN TELL YOU THE RX WILL BE STRONG....ALWAYS STRONG, BECAUSE THERE IS REVENUE HERE FOR THOSE THAT GAMBLE. AND THIS IS THE MECCA OF SPORTS GAMING INFORMATION. NOW SCOUTING OTHER LOCATIONS AND NEW SITES....THAT IS PART OF THE DUE DILLIGENCE THAT ALL SHOUD TAKE.And when it comes down to it, General was a General, not a gambler, but his leadership on the site should be respected, and we all should have the confidence it will. Shrink, much more of a gambler, and we will look for his strong gambling acumen as he moves on......but let;s stay the course and unerstand why you are here $$$$$$



BUT I WILL SAY AS A SENIOR MEMBER HERE....I KNOW WHAT MAKES THIS SITE QUALITY AND IF IT EVEN A SMIDGEN MOVES AWAY FROM THAT


THEN NEWPORT WILL TELL YOU, AND YOU WILL KNOW THE PROBLEMS.......

RIGHT NOW.......IS SEE NOTHING THAT WILL ALLOW THAT TOO HAPPEN

JOURNEYMAN

WILLHELM

DANTE

BUCSFAN

SHERMAN

ALL QUALITY INDIVIDUALS THAT PRIDE THEMSELVES IN VEGAS GAMBLING, AND KEEPING THINGS IN ORDER

Also this is HOME to ALL of us, and I know I will help keep my home nice. Don't you??? When our favorite players go to other football teams, we are not happy sometimes, but they are always our favorite players. Just remember that.

gl to all that have helped this place build a solid reputation....and to the existing leadership.......You can count on Newport to help continue the cause.

I know I am brash sometimes, and I do call a spade a spade, but I am full of friendship, and partnership. NEWPORT
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
6,480
Tokens
Whoson1st said:
Shrink's and General's banning here....will ASSURE their new site to be a success,...

Well, it will certainly help. So far as there is any public information they were banned without cause.

If I have bought a restaurant from someone and they subsequently went on to open another restaurant I would not prohibit them from eating at my place.

It certainly appears mean spirited and since this was a decision of owners reflects badly upon them.
 

LA Clippers Junkie
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
11,323
Tokens
Woody0 said:
Well, it will certainly help. So far as there is any public information they were banned without cause.

If I have bought a restaurant from someone and they subsequently went on to open another restaurant I would not prohibit them from eating at my place.

It certainly appears mean spirited and since this was a decision of owners reflects badly upon them.

It probably has more to do with the owners of this site feeling they used this site as a vehicle to extort $20,000 from a sportsbook. While I do not agree with the decision, that is the only reason I can comprehend they could be banned.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 1999
Messages
8,227
Tokens
Woody0 said:
Well, it will certainly help. So far as there is any public information they were banned without cause.

If I have bought a restaurant from someone and they subsequently went on to open another restaurant I would not prohibit them from eating at my place.

It certainly appears mean spirited and since this was a decision of owners reflects badly upon them.

You guys are making much too much of the ban it is a ban of their names....they have about 7 ghosts a piece....we are all family get a grip on this....they will always be here....for the Love of god already

image.php
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Tokens
kosar, Bet Royal is a horrible book whether or not this guy is owed $. Why did Royal say they are gonig to pay if he has a $0 balance? Hell, bettors can't get Royal to pay them with money in their account.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,730
Tokens
kosar said:
Chuck,
What's your deal, man? 'Shrink working on getting these 'fools' paid'? He's extorting a book that doesn't owe this guy any money. For Christ's sake, have you heard the tapes? Oh, right.

Royal sucks with all of their slow pays, but it has nothing to do with this.

Good stuff there; I'll put that in the "It's not the fall that kills the parachutist...it's the landing" department. A shit book slow pays a guy for weeks and you treat it like an itch on your ass that just has to be scratched. What's $20,000 between friends right?

Maybe if Royal was a bit more reputable Shrink wouldn't have been as inclined to believe the other side. Or they simply could have sent him the tapes instead of admitting guilt in that disjointed mea culpa posted on here a few days ago. Royal's behavior is hardly the actions of an innocent party.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
511
Tokens
Chuck Sims said:
kosar, Bet Royal is a horrible book whether or not this guy is owed $. Why did Royal say they are gonig to pay if he has a $0 balance? Hell, bettors can't get Royal to pay them with money in their account.

I agree that Royal slow pays. In fact, on another forum today, I said that this would be among the last book that I would ever recommend to somebody.

But that crap about 'shrink trying to get people paid' is ridiculous. You've never seemed like one to swallow the shrink kool-aid, but I have to wonder.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1999
Messages
511
Tokens
Shotgun said:
Good stuff there; I'll put that in the "It's not the fall that kills the parachutist...it's the landing" department. A shit book slow pays a guy for weeks and you treat it like an itch on your ass that just has to be scratched. What's $20,000 between friends right?

Maybe if Royal was a bit more reputable Shrink wouldn't have been as inclined to believe the other side. Or they simply could have sent him the tapes instead of admitting guilt in that disjointed mea culpa posted on here a few days ago. Royal's behavior is hardly the actions of an innocent party.

See my post to Chuck above.

Also, that attitude is along the Jay Cohen way of thinking. They slow pay sometimes and therefore should not be believed about anything. Even with tapes, etc.
 

Like a sinner before the gates of heaven
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
1,255
Tokens
Childish move from rx.looks like sour grapes on their part. Don' believe any rumors it had something to do with the royal fiasco.I mean c'mon the guy who bought this place "slow" paid a whole country if i remember right!!! When the new place opens i will follow the pilgrimage away from this site. Hopefully the rest will follow:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
11,881
Tokens
vegasisstilldead said:
Childish move from rx.looks like sour grapes on their part. Don' believe any rumors it had something to do with the royal fiasco.I mean c'mon the guy who bought this place "slow" paid a whole country if i remember right!!! When the new place opens i will follow the pilgrimage away from this site. Hopefully the rest will follow:103631605



Members: 20,774


thr rx has this many members and yes many will go over there and still be here

i do not like the move , then again i never owned a business like this
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,910
Tokens
Whoson1st said:
Why Ken sold the "Rx" remains a mystery to me. Yes..I know why he said he sold it. But when I consider the Daily Racing Form (A New York based publication) also takes advertizing for offshore books on their ON-LINE website as does E-Ponies a (Kentucky based web-site); then I wonder if he sold it because he simply needed the funds.

Guess it's something that I'll never know.

He sold it so he could throw the new owners under the bus.
 

Pop-culture, entertainment, sports and contest Mod
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
33,977
Tokens
vegasisstilldead said:
The only problem with that number is 20,674 are ghosts:lolBIG:


Thats a lie...

But if it suits your purpose, keep believing it.....
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,115,832
Messages
13,527,259
Members
100,328
Latest member
ronaldindia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com