whoa...man..i am not going to waste all my time reading all that because you've proven you are not very bright and i am not going to bother...but i did skim through it and notice you said the refs screwed the seahawks over..you sound like a child..the better team won..listen to yourself man, is that how you would raise your kids? to whine and complain that they got screwed by refs or a fix? it doesnt matter if this is pro football..the better team won and you cant whine and bitch about calls..i think you are the one that's blind and/or have selective memory, watch that game again because you've forgotten how shitty the seahawks played especially late in the game, hasselback and the seahawks had a good chance to win that game...they blew it and lost fair and square..bottom line..the better team won..STEELERS!! alright? alright
I see...so the real truth doesn't even matter to you...it's ok that Kennedy put up a false front.
Whatever...:think2:
On that note...I don't think there is any need to discuss anything anymore.
Sumday,
First off let me just say that i had pitt in the superbowl so i was very happy with what the refs did. But to sit here and say that the refs didnt screw seattle over is totally insane. The better team didnt win.
You do know it only takes 1 or 2 bad calls for it to cost a team a win?
You might want to watch that superbowl again and pay attention to the bullshit flags, which i was happy for. Trith is if i didnt have the refs on my side that day, i would have lost my bet for sure.
Oh well the bottomline is you have your opinion and i have mine.
good luck with all your games
I completely agree. That game (and others) are played out so that the team the NFL wants to win does. It was just very obvious this time.Sumday,
First off let me just say that i had pitt in the superbowl so i was very happy with what the refs did. But to sit here and say that the refs didnt screw seattle over is totally insane. The better team didnt win.
You do know it only takes 1 or 2 bad calls for it to cost a team a win?
You might want to watch that superbowl again and pay attention to the bullshit flags, which i was happy for. Trith is if i didnt have the refs on my side that day, i would have lost my bet for sure.
Oh well the bottomline is you have your opinion and i have mine.
good luck with all your games
I haven't read all the posts in this thread and this point has doubtlessly been made already, but it's silly to think a player would only throw a game over money. There are many ways to apply leverage to a person besides financial. Someone with damaging, or potentially incriminating information, could blackmail or extort an athlete into compromising himself on the field. If you can't envision such a scenario, you're totally lacking in imagination.
Beyond that, it's silly to think players wouldn't shave points for money, despite their huge salaries. 40% of NBA players are broke five years after they leave the league and there are several NFL players who are similarly irresponsible with money. Also, there's an intense level of competition in certain lockerooms to wear the nicest clothes, drive the hottest sports car, entertain the most expensive women. Some lesser athletes find themselves frustrated when they get overshadowed by their higher paid teammates in this regard. Tamarick Vanover found himself arrested for financing a stolen car ring, in part because he was trying to keep pace with flashy Kansas City teammates like Andre Rison.
The NFL is not rife with corruption, but you're living in denial if you believe nobody would ever throw a game or shave points.