Anybody Watching Republican Debate?

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
I finally got reminded on why I like Christie.

But what's upsetting is is stance on Colorados drug laws that he said he would enforce the federal laws on day 1.

This is the same guy who says the government should have no role on if you should be able to bet on sports .


Why is all these people so selective on freedom of choice.


On one issue they think freedom of choice but on the next issue all of a sudden you should not have freedom of choice.

Rand Paul is the only one consistent on freedom of choice.


I was just about ready to give my support back to CC then he came out with that at the end and I don't even do drugs
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
Carson is just too nice.

I think he is in it for all the right reasons I just don't see enough people that would vote for him
 

New member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
668
Tokens
What's unbelievable is how the GOP allows these ridiculous left wing theories to smash them election after election.

In addition to every vote garnered by President Dole, President McCain and President Romney, a genuine uplifting Patriotic Economically Libertarian Christian Conservative will bring out every libertarian in the country, every conservative in the country, every God-fearing Bible thumper who clings to their guns and religion, every last hibernating Reagan Democrat in every town and city, as well as millions of true stay-at-home 'independents' fed up with politics as usual - losers ruining the country in every way.

A real conservative doesn't need to know "electoral math" or political speak because his or her message and common sense vision for America will color the electoral map red.

Pure comedy. On top of that I went out in the world, made money for myself and paid others all while you sat here posting bullshit right wing fucktard drivel.

Math..Pftt...That's for losers! Shefiff Joe has Magic Conservatardism...

"If you just nominate the candidate who appeals to the smallest number of people, THEN we will win. Yeah Yeah..."

Since you're too fucking stupid sheriff I'll put it into terms your fat useless self can understand:

If those damn diabetics would just eat MORE FUCKING SUGAR, then their diabetes would be cured. Yeah Yeah...That's the ticket.

I figured it out now...You work the graveyard shift at Jack-in-Da-Box asking drunk folks if they want fries with that. All so you can sit here and on twitter and facebook fighting the good conservatard fight all day long. You are one pathetic loser!

Lunch is over...Back to work...Don't worry Sheriff, some of us are actually supporting our country instead of living in that make believe land you reside in!
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,998
Tokens
Pure comedy. On top of that I went out in the world, made money for myself and paid others all while you sat here posting bullshit right wing fucktard drivel.

Math..Pftt...That's for losers! Shefiff Joe has Magic Conservatardism...

"If you just nominate the candidate who appeals to the smallest number of people, THEN we will win. Yeah Yeah..."

Since you're too fucking stupid sheriff I'll put it into terms your fat useless self can understand:

If those damn diabetics would just eat MORE FUCKING SUGAR, then their diabetes would be cured. Yeah Yeah...That's the ticket.

I figured it out now...You work the graveyard shift at Jack-in-Da-Box asking drunk folks if they want fries with that. All so you can sit here and on twitter and facebook fighting the good conservatard fight all day long. You are one pathetic loser!

Lunch is over...Back to work...Don't worry Sheriff, some of us are actually supporting our country instead of living in that make believe land you reside in!

Are you related to Duhfinch by any chance?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,616
Tokens
I finally got reminded on why I like Christie.

But what's upsetting is is stance on Colorados drug laws that he said he would enforce the federal laws on day 1.

This is the same guy who says the government should have no role on if you should be able to bet on sports .


Why is all these people so selective on freedom of choice.


On one issue they think freedom of choice but on the next issue all of a sudden you should not have freedom of choice.

Rand Paul is the only one consistent on freedom of choice.


I was just about ready to give my support back to CC then he came out with that at the end and I don't even do drugs

Truth. Paul is the only one who is consistent on all things freedom and liberty. I disagree with him on most issues about NSA spying but atleast he is consistent.

Most of these other guys are just paying lip service when they talk about "small government"

You know why he doesn't use this clear divide to his political advantage? Because to be honest, nobody really cares. Most people voting Republican are a lot more pro-Gov't than they would like to admit. That is why that platform really doesn't make the headway you would think it would.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,504
Tokens
I was really disappointed with CC when he went into the gateway drug thing that's been proven false 100 times.

Then you got Trumph who says vaccines cause autism.

Looks like there is nowhere to turn.

Rubio has his freedom issues that I highly disagree with to but I think he is the most viable at this point.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,616
Tokens
CC once said something that I have come to accept as true....

"If you want someone to agree with you on every single issue, look in the mirror."
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens
By far and away the most Consistently Hilarious theme in the RxPolyForum (going on 15+ years now) is reading my nephew Mark (Sheriff Joe Contrarian) - a lifelong resident and citizen of Canada - ranting about "his candidates" in a United States election cycle
 

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
690
Tokens
Has it taken you and everyone else THIS LONG to figure that out?

Fucking useless Republicans have DONE NOTHING and have REFUSED to do anything. No middle ground on anything. No we agree on "this" or "That". Whack jobs in La La Land ACTUALLY BELIEVE they do not have to negotiate on anything. It's ALL OR NOTHING. Meanwhile the asshole mega rich are busy using and abusing the average American while the get richer and richer.

And dumb fucking conservatards will keep voting for these trickle down douche bags...JOKE.
##) :ohno:

:aktion033:aktion033:aktion033:aktion033:aktion033

O-F-Y-159795762301.jpeg
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,625
Tokens
You fucking moron! Never heard of proxies hey? Fucking clueless little boy in Mom's basement....I could vote 10,000 times in that poll if I wanted to. Would take about 20 mins to write the script (about 5 to buy it) and 5 to find about 25K proxies to run through it...Douche bags with a keyboard that have NO CLUE about the internet.

Get your dumbass off to school now little boy...

You keep trying to be one step ahead of DeFinch
in a 'Ghetto Lingo' race to the bottom. I'm
sure your demeanor would be embraced in any country club setting.

Why is it that those of your ilk become so enraged
& rattled at the asendency of the Trump 'Movement' or even Ted Cruz standings pollwise
that your posts sound like a hysterical women shrieking at an unfaithful spouse.

Calm down, Guesser was just as unformidible as you as
a Trump hater & apparently wised up, he gave up, try it!

I graduated a long time ago, no need. In the interest of discovery, I was curious about
where the candidates received their undergraduate degrees. Only 4 of the 11 graduated
from an instutution rated higher than my alma mater by US News & World Report.
1)Ted Cruz-Princeton 3) Ben Carson Yale 4) Fiorina-Stanford & 9) Don Trump- Pennsylvania.

Even if you managed to get an interview with the Dean of Admissions at the college of
your choice, which I doubt, your demeanor I imagine would not have enhance your chances.
I doubt these online rip-off colleges even require an interview, take that route.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
By far and away the most Consistently Hilarious theme in the RxPolyForum (going on 15+ years now) is reading my nephew Mark (Sheriff Joe Contrarian) - a lifelong resident and citizen of Canada - ranting about "his candidates" in a United States election cycle

In fairness, "his candidate" is also a Canadian by birth.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens
##) :ohno:

:aktion033:aktion033:aktion033:aktion033:aktion033

O-F-Y-159795762301.jpeg

Don't forget that President Obama also brought into reality a playoff system for major CFB
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,350
Tokens
Not surprised that you and Joe have a difference of opinion.

I know vtard and VWJOE have a vested interest in protecting Hussein's legacy after he leaves office, but the RINO establishment (no, not directed at you Mantis) should know better.

They have this delusional belief if they lure Democrats to their side they'll win. That never EVER works (why would a Democrat vote for Democrat-lite if he can have the real authentic thing?)

Never mind not catching the right fish, these guys aren't even fishing in the right pond. In fact, I would say they're fishing with hunting riffles hoping the fish will magically jump into their boat.

RNC = useless idiots
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens
These "debates" remind me of websites which this very month are conducting mock drafts for the 2016 NFL and NBA

Let's face United States electoral history and understand that when the March primaries end, only JEB! will have enough committed delegates to carry the summer 2016 GOP convention

Trump may well place a quasi-respectable second place because he can likely afford the financial investment to do significant television advertising in the target states. But there is no way he can compete with the money machine which Bush backers will command when it comes to the stretch drive of April-October. The entire Wash DC GOP and Wall St GOP establishment will be putting their money behind Bush.

Trump might actually get in the neighborhood of 30% of delegates nationally and at that point will of course break his "vow" to not run as an Indy. He will muck around with that from April thru the convention in late summer, raking in millions of Goober dollars which he will then pocket once he drops out. Dude is nothing if not a smart, savvy financial guy and this Repub population in the year 2016 is more ripe for Grifting than any that has preceded it

Rubio maybe and Rand Paul maybe get 10% each of the deleagates by end of March. No other existing GOP candidate will have more than 5% committed.

JEB! will select a VP candidate like Carly or maybe Rubio in hopes of impacting Florida, but that's truly all the drama we are likely to see between now and September. Everything else is nothing more than a variation of The Real Housewives franchise
 

New member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
668
Tokens
I know vtard and VWJOE have a vested interest in protecting Hussein's legacy after he leaves office, but the RINO establishment (no, not directed at you Mantis) should know better.

They have this delusional belief if they lure Democrats to their side they'll win. That never EVER works (why would a Democrat vote for Democrat-lite if he can have the real authentic thing?)

Never mind not catching the right fish, these guys aren't even fishing in the right pond. In fact, I would say they're fishing with hunting riffles hoping the fish will magically jump into their boat.

RNC = useless idiots

Dude...I have NO INTEREST in either party, much less protecting anyone. I run my own biz and I'm a registered IND. I owe NOTHING nor want ANYTHING from either fucktard party. I laugh at and have fun degrading the far right morons like yourself because you are hilariously wrong about most things. Not all, but most. The tea party morons are the biggest bunch of panzie asses I've ever seen in my life. I'd be embarrassed to be a man and be that fearful of anything much less the freaking govt. I'm sure you had childhood issues though like many others so I'll just give you the benefit of the doubt and move on. I had great parents. I've seen far too many people become whack jobs though because their parents were useless. Anyways...

The funniest part though is that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that a repub like Cruz can win a national election. It's pure comedy. Trump at least has some middle of the road views and he will surely gain votes from IND and some DEMS because of them (i.e. taxing mega wealthy, keeping tax system progressive instead of flat, etc.). YOU on the other hand have this DELUSIONAL theory that "if you build it, they will just magically come vote".

You are BEYOND psychotic and ideological with it. It's hilarious. Your post above "That never EVER works"....LMFAO at you. The so-called best prez ever for repubs, Reagan, got elected BECAUSE A SHITLOAD of IND and DEMS voted for him. But no, you're right....IT NEVER WORKS! face)(*^%

On top of that you continue to just be in denial that white conservatives do not make up as much of the electorate as they used to in America. In your head it's all BS and all that needs to happen is that conservatives need to come vote and it will all "magically" work out. LMFAO...No it won't. The last election should have demonstrated that to you PLAIN AND SIMPLE. But again, you can't accept it. If "only" someone like Cruz had been running THAT would have made all the difference. That is what you TRULY BELIEVE which is what makes it so damn funny.

You live in La La Land, Sheriff. Cruz has NO CHANCE of EVER winning the presidency. ZERO.

Trump does have a chance. That much I absolutely will agree with you on. It's politics. It's early. And ANYTHING can happen. Not a good chance IMO. But still a chance. It is VERY early though and I believe he will dig his own grave eventually with his lack of skills and experience in areas outside of business and real estate. Maybe not...We shall see...But I would much rather be on the side of the casino for that bet than making them.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
668
Tokens
These "debates" remind me of websites which this very month are conducting mock drafts for the 2016 NFL and NBA

Let's face United States electoral history and understand that when the March primaries end, only JEB! will have enough committed delegates to carry the summer 2016 GOP convention

Trump may well place a quasi-respectable second place because he can likely afford the financial investment to do significant television advertising in the target states. But there is no way he can compete with the money machine which Bush backers will command when it comes to the stretch drive of April-October. The entire Wash DC GOP and Wall St GOP establishment will be putting their money behind Bush.

Trump might actually get in the neighborhood of 30% of delegates nationally and at that point will of course break his "vow" to not run as an Indy. He will muck around with that from April thru the convention in late summer, raking in millions of Goober dollars which he will then pocket once he drops out. Dude is nothing if not a smart, savvy financial guy and this Repub population in the year 2016 is more ripe for Grifting than any that has preceded it

Rubio maybe and Rand Paul maybe get 10% each of the deleagates by end of March. No other existing GOP candidate will have more than 5% committed.

JEB! will select a VP candidate like Carly or maybe Rubio in hopes of impacting Florida, but that's truly all the drama we are likely to see between now and September. Everything else is nothing more than a variation of The Real Housewives franchise

JEB is toast. He has NO GAME. He has money but he's in the right place at the wrong time. He has no people skills. Rubio has 5X the political skills of JEB. No way that donor class monkey even comes close to winning the nomination.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
I finally got reminded on why I like Christie.

But what's upsetting is is stance on Colorados drug laws that he said he would enforce the federal laws on day 1.

This is the same guy who says the government should have no role on if you should be able to bet on sports .


Why is all these people so selective on freedom of choice.


On one issue they think freedom of choice but on the next issue all of a sudden you should not have freedom of choice.

Rand Paul is the only one consistent on freedom of choice.


I was just about ready to give my support back to CC then he came out with that at the end and I don't even do drugs

Just to correct one thing, Christie was kinda dragged kicking and screaming into supporting the Sports Betting in Jersey thing by the NJ Dem Legislators, and the true champion of Sports Betting in Jersey, State Sen Raymond Lesniak. I think his stance as President would be similar to his stance on Pot.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,809
Messages
13,573,442
Members
100,871
Latest member
Legend813
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com