An Open Letter To Khizr Khan

Search
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,126
Tokens


You are late to the party again RR. The website is shut down because it can't handle the volume of traffic, and Khan is not seeking new clients at this time.


by Brian Hayes | Top Right News
Khizr Khan, who suddenly rose to fame after his speech at the Democrat National Convention, and who has made one media appearance after the next bashing Donald Trump, is now making desperate attempts to cover up his business interests and background.


Kahn’s website reveals he is an attorney deeply involved in “pay for play” immigration fraudassisting foreign investors to buy their way into the U.S. through a controversial visa program “frought with corruption” according to a U.S. Senate committee chairman.
That has now been completely DELETED off the internet.
The website link to his website now reverts back to GoDaddy (hosting website), and the entire Khan Law Office website is wiped clean. It was, however, all captured in the internet archives, and TRN has obtained a copy…

Given Trump’s opposition to illegal immigration and Islamic “refugee” abuse, it is obvious why Khan would oppose him financially, and thus politically want him defeated.
Kahn is the father of a Muslim-American soldier killed in Iraq, and was paraded out to speak at the DNC, where he condemned Republican nominee Donald Trump, when Hillary Clinton was actually the one who supported the war where his son ultimately died.
One U.S. veteran published an open letter to Khan that has quickly gone viral.
The EB5 program helps rich foreigners skip the metaphorical lines in legal immigration and allows them to enter the country much more quickly than they normally would be able to. As Conservative Tribune reports:
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said “there are classified reports that detail the national security, fraud and abuse (of the EB5 program). Our committee has received numerous briefings and classified documents to show this side of the story,” he said.
“The enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security wrote an internal memo that raises significant concerns about the program,” Grassley explained. “One section of the memo outlines concerns that it could be used by Iranian operatives to infiltrate the United States
“The memo identifies seven main areas of program vulnerability, including theexport of sensitive technology, economic espionage, use by foreign government agents and terrorists, investment fraud, illicit finance and money laundering,” he concluded.
Looks like Khan got caught red-handed using his son’s tragic and heroic death to defeat a political enemy who threatened his large and connected law firm’s economic interests.
The media is CENSORING the corrupt truth about the Khans in order to defeat Donald Trump…
http://toprightnews.com/anti-trump-...website-we-found-out-what-hes-trying-to-hide/
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
This guy is going to get exposed. Sad thing is that he has taken his sons death and turned it into a political circus. Got a feeling the skeletons are going to come out. Seen online that he said that Shira law trumps the constitution of the U.S.

Lets see what happens
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
Cruz is a militant small government 10th Amendment conservative. I can assure you he does not want the federal government poking around your pot! Let the states decide, would be his response.

Cruz is anti-marijuana! C'mon!

face)(*^%

Yeah, I was using those as examples of his moral high horse escapades while I'm sure he's banging hookers on the side or something. I just don't like the man.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,437
Tokens
THE WRATH OF KHAN

Ann Coulter

August 3, 2016


Khizr Khan, the Muslim "Gold Star Father" who harangued Americans at the Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side, is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to defend their heinous policies. The "Jersey Girls" were the classic example, first described in that magnificent book Godless: The Church of Liberalism
ir
.

In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.

Khan's argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that "our" Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.

If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year -- as we do -- we'd already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn't have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the "argument" part of Khan's point is gibberish.

Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can't say anything.

Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan's son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's why we're obligated to import yet more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed his son. Q.E.D.!


If you think that doesn't make any sense, keep your yap shut, unless you lost a child in Iraq, too.

There were virtually no Muslims in America before Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration act. Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than from Great Britain.

Are Americans allowed to have an opinion on whether that's a good idea?

So far, it's worked out great!

In addition to the sudden appearance of honor killings, clitorectomies, hijabs and massive government frauds, Muslim immigrants have given us: The most devastating terrorist attack in world history, followed by terrorist attacks at Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, a military recruiting center in Chattanooga, Times Square, Vaughan Foods in Oklahoma, San Bernardino and an Orlando nightclub, among other places.

We've admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had been admitted before 9/11. If we don't make it 3 million, we're monsters? May we ask how many Muslims Khan's mystery Constitution requires -- or is that out of bounds unless we had a child who died in Iraq?

Apparently, sending out a victim to make their argument was the only option left for the "Make America Muslim!" crowd.

After Trump
ir
somehow got the crazy idea that a presidential candidate was allowed to discuss government policies and proposed a temporary ban on Muslim immigration -- which, by the way, is perfectly constitutional -- the entire media and political class erupted in a sputtering rage.

Conscience of a Nation, Speaker Paul Ryan proclaimed: "That's not who we are." Jeb! Bush made the subtle and clever argument that Trump was "unhinged." Marco Rubio called any pause in Muslim immigration "offensive." ABC News' Jonathan Karl called Trump's plan "outrageous" -- which was way better than MSNBC, where Trump was compared to white supremacists and Nazis.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Trump had "disqualifie(d)" himself from "serving as president" for suggesting any slowdown in Muslim immigration. Vice President Joe Biden -- tribune of blue-collar Americans everywhere! -- said that if Trump were the nominee, Hillary would "win in a walk."

Then it turned out Trump's Muslim ban was a huge hit with actual voters. Hillary, who promises to quadruple the number of Syrian "refugees" we bring in, is quite far from winning "in a walk."

So the media and political class had no choice: They had to produce a victim to make their argument, in order to block any response. For their next trick, Democrats plan to produce a little girl whose parents were recently murdered to present their tax plan. (Better make sure they weren't killed by an illegal alien!)

Does anyone know what Khan thinks of gays? How about miniskirts? Alcohol? Because I gather we're going to have to turn all our policies over to him, too. What have you sacrificed, Barney Frank??

Muslim troops accounted for 0.2 percent of all U.S. troop deaths in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Southerners accounted for 38 percent of those killed in Iraq and 47 percent in Afghanistan.

What has South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley "sacrificed" compared to the families of these men? How about Nikki put their flag back up?

The Confederate flag won't lead to thousands of dead and maimed Americans, as Muslim immigration does. The only danger posed by the Confederate flag is that media elites will hold the South in even greater contempt than they already do, assuming that's possible.

But as long as they brought it up, if only people who lost children in our wars may discuss public policy, then only they should vote, not only on how many more Muslim immigrants this country needs, but on all government policies. What has Chuck Todd sacrificed? Have any current members of The New York Times editorial board ever lost a son in war? (Fighting on the American side.)

The inevitable conclusion to the hysteria over Khan is that only those who have worn the uniform and heard shots fired in anger can vote in our elections. Hello, media? Hey -- where'd everybody go?

 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,437
Tokens
Ann Coulter is Sheriff Joe with a dick.

The ignorant troll chimes in.

"In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever."

What exactly did she get wrong? Your party is beyond pathetic and predictable!

"Make America Muslim" crowd
:ok:
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
If you don't agree with what she wrote then why don't you tear it apart, line-by-line, instead of what you just typed?

I didn't even read it. I know what it says once I see the title and author.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
The ignorant troll chimes in.

"In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever."

What exactly did she get wrong? Your party is beyond pathetic and predictable!

"Make America Muslim" crowd
:ok:

Uh.....like repubs trotting out the mother of a Benghazi victim.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
I didn't even read it. I know what it says once I see the title and author.


So instead you trolled.....


Every morning Vit and Joe wake up. And every morning one or both of them decides to reignite their battle by flicking a booger on the other.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
Uh.....like repubs trotting out the mother of a Benghazi victim.

Two totally different viewpoints. Bengazhi was a direct correlation of terrible leadership by Clinton. Also the lying part and the fact that it really happened. The racist smearing of Trump is all hypothetical by Khan....in which I believe he has some skeltons. It had nothing to do with his sons death on why he was on stage.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
So instead you trolled.....


Every morning Vit and Joe wake up. And every morning one or both of them decides to reignite their battle by flicking a booger on the other.

If that's what you wanna call it. Maybe you will point out when that's done to me the other 364 days? Forget it, we've been thru this before.

In politics, who is delivering the message is often more important than the message. In her case, it's always the same song and dance. She's smart though....she doesn't actually believes what she says....but she knows the lemmings will line her pockets if she says what they think.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Two totally different viewpoints. Bengazhi was a direct correlation of terrible leadership by Clinton. Also the lying part and the fact that it really happened. The racist smearing of Trump is all hypothetical by Khan....in which I believe he has some skeltons. It had nothing to do with his sons death on why he was on stage.

Why didn't repubs invite Ambassador Stevens family to speak? Do you think it's because they have been supportive of Clinton and don't blame her for his death?

they trotted her out for political reasons.....no other reason
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
Why didn't repubs invite Ambassador Stevens family to speak? Do you think it's because they have been supportive of Clinton and don't blame her for his death?

they trotted her out for political reasons.....no other reason

So why was Khan on stage? To promote racism? Just curious. He has gone on record saying Sharia law trumps the US Constitution.

I just cant figure this guy out and why he was put on stage.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
So why was Khan on stage? To promote racism? Just curious. He has gone on record saying Sharia law trumps the US Constitution.

I just cant figure this guy out and why he was put on stage.

I guess to make a point that Muslims die in wars fighting for America. Doubt many on the right know that....and Trump probably doesn't either.

I think an interview posted here shows he does not support sharia law over constitution.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
So why was Khan on stage? To promote racism? Just curious. He has gone on record saying Sharia law trumps the US Constitution.

I just cant figure this guy out and why he was put on stage.

The why is easy. It was politically expedient. It's hurt Trump. If it had been politically expedient for Trump and the Republicans to throw him up there, they would've done it too.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,437
Tokens
So instead you trolled.....


Every morning Vit and Joe wake up. And every morning one or both of them decides to reignite their battle by flicking a booger on the other.

Yep, the troll can't help himself. He says he can, he says he will, but he never does.

It doesn't matter if I'm around or not...lying and trolling is who he is and what he does.

"Scott, I tried it your way but it just didn't work!" :missingte
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Yep, the troll can't help himself. He says he can, he says he will, but he never does.

It doesn't matter if I'm around or not...lying and trolling is who he is and what he does.

"Scott, I tried it your way but it just didn't work!" :missingte

You have admitted you troll me and admitted it proudly. You also have said " it doesn't matter if what I post is false".

So let's not try to act like you are some victim here.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,437
Tokens
A leopard never changes its spots.

Asking vtard to stop lying and trolling is like asking...

- Jaguara to stop hating Jews

- Muslims to modernize and stop blowing things up

- Democrats to stop trotting out 'victims' to support their weak arguments and ideology

- Scott L to stop being funny

- Mantis to get off the fence

- the Prius Pussy to stop posting his lame-ass "nailed it" memes

- the Kenyan to produce his actual birth certificate

- Crooked Hillary to quit crime

The poker fraud won't change and I don't expect him to change.

This forum is his entire life - lying and trolling 24-7-365 (especially holidays) is who he and what he does.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,992
Messages
13,575,970
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com