Dude,
Remember, it's the most CURRENT line available when you post your play. In this instance, you posted at 6:57pm ET and the line is actually Woffard -1 1/2, but I'll let it "slide" this time.
I'm sure everyone would like to go back in time and get Woff at +1 but sorry, YOU JUST CAN'T DO THAT.
BTW, why didn't you post this play when it first opened? Save it & I'll tell you why...it's because each and everyone of our posts are time-stamped.
Remember, it's the most CURRENT line available when you post your play. In this instance, you posted at 6:57pm ET and the line is actually Woffard -1 1/2, but I'll let it "slide" this time.
I'm sure everyone would like to go back in time and get Woff at +1 but sorry, YOU JUST CAN'T DO THAT.
BTW, why didn't you post this play when it first opened? Save it & I'll tell you why...it's because each and everyone of our posts are time-stamped.
Dear Lines Nazi:
Wofford was at -1 at 7 books on the Don Best screen when I posted this.
I was just trying to rile you up.
also, please note that only ONE prop was played in this contest. and it lost. so you can stop whining about the types of plays. and yes, you should have been more specific about the types of plays you were looking for. but you did not do that. after you send me my money, I may give you a chance to win some of it back, using a stricter set of rules.
and who knows, if I lose both of these plays tonight, you might still have a chance.
AC
Wofford was at -1 at 7 books on the Don Best screen when I posted this.
I was just trying to rile you up.
also, please note that only ONE prop was played in this contest. and it lost. so you can stop whining about the types of plays. and yes, you should have been more specific about the types of plays you were looking for. but you did not do that. after you send me my money, I may give you a chance to win some of it back, using a stricter set of rules.
and who knows, if I lose both of these plays tonight, you might still have a chance.
AC
You asked me earlier about a 'theoretical situation' where you would make 20 -500 ML picks. That would be fine--you are technically making 100 picks BUT, if the end result is 18-2 (or, more accurately 18-10), you'd still need to achieve 42 more winners, prior to 30 more losers for you to reach 60%.
You see, although you're trying to confuse me, you're only confusing yourself..the object has always been to produce at least 60 winners over a span of 100 games. Yes, you could play those LARGE -500 ML games, but keep in mind, you'd need to win at least 60 of them. And if any of them lost, you lose 5 games each.
Why you wanna look at it from only one side??
You see, although you're trying to confuse me, you're only confusing yourself..the object has always been to produce at least 60 winners over a span of 100 games. Yes, you could play those LARGE -500 ML games, but keep in mind, you'd need to win at least 60 of them. And if any of them lost, you lose 5 games each.
Why you wanna look at it from only one side??
ff: technically, you asked for people to have a winning % of 60 or greater in 100 picks. this was not a contest about winning units.
as someone else pointed out, the best strategy if you are behind is to pick moneyline dogs--if they lose, it is only one loss. but if they win, it is multiple wins.
you should have disallowed moneylines from the start.
like I said, after you send me the money. I will be happy to start another round of 100 picks with a clearer set of rules.
AC
as someone else pointed out, the best strategy if you are behind is to pick moneyline dogs--if they lose, it is only one loss. but if they win, it is multiple wins.
you should have disallowed moneylines from the start.
like I said, after you send me the money. I will be happy to start another round of 100 picks with a clearer set of rules.
AC
No one team totals, no mlines, no 2nd halfs, AC this guy FF is pure chump.
The statement that books who offer this type of betting are not commonly available or not safe and reputable, are the words of a minor, underaged juvenile.
One who's already registered his new nick.
The statement that books who offer this type of betting are not commonly available or not safe and reputable, are the words of a minor, underaged juvenile.
One who's already registered his new nick.
I think your last post hit the nail on the head.
I knew this was going to happen. I'm just glad no one sent him money. My goal was to shut this clown up. which I will have done, although I'm sure he will be back with some other name.
I will be finishing the challenge out anyway, just to see what my final % will be. I almost posted 8 middles/sides tonight so that I could finish at 60% exactly with no risk, but i didn't think that would be in the spirit of the challenge.
tonight's results:
W NBA: Chicago -2.
L NBA: Denver/Minn over 179.5 (oly)
W NBA: Denv/Minn under 90 second half (oly)
W NBA: Hou -3 second half (oly)
W CBB: Wofford -1
Push CBB: Oklahoma + 2 (should have been a winner with the hook but posted it too early)
W CBB: Ok. St - 1 1/2 second half (cascade)
5-1 (throwing out the push) for the night takes me to 57-33. 63.3% in order to achieve 60%, I only have to go 3-7 the rest of the way. maybe, I should lose the rest of them on purpose and see if chump factors shows his face, demanding to be paid.
AC
I will be finishing the challenge out anyway, just to see what my final % will be. I almost posted 8 middles/sides tonight so that I could finish at 60% exactly with no risk, but i didn't think that would be in the spirit of the challenge.
tonight's results:
W NBA: Chicago -2.
L NBA: Denver/Minn over 179.5 (oly)
W NBA: Denv/Minn under 90 second half (oly)
W NBA: Hou -3 second half (oly)
W CBB: Wofford -1
Push CBB: Oklahoma + 2 (should have been a winner with the hook but posted it too early)
W CBB: Ok. St - 1 1/2 second half (cascade)
5-1 (throwing out the push) for the night takes me to 57-33. 63.3% in order to achieve 60%, I only have to go 3-7 the rest of the way. maybe, I should lose the rest of them on purpose and see if chump factors shows his face, demanding to be paid.
AC
That Oak game was a winner for you, just about 2.5 across the board.
You gave this guy just about every line break but still he complained you were juicing your lines.
AC that was a very fine performance, very fine.
Will be checking you out here and there. Remember my name, it may help you out down the line.
You gave this guy just about every line break but still he complained you were juicing your lines.
AC that was a very fine performance, very fine.
Will be checking you out here and there. Remember my name, it may help you out down the line.
