Cheers EB and please allow me to apologize in advance for the length of this all.
Agree entirely with you in regards to Hoppertunity and his SA Derby performances. I didn't see him as being fully cranked either. But I thought it was a nice solid effort for what it was and for how that track has been playing all spring. Just a good prep race to keep the fitness level high and without overdoing it. Really like how he is bred for stamina (top 2 or 3 in the field) and while he's not going to blow people away with his turn of foot, he does have that consistent running style that grinds out fractions at 12 and change, 12 and change, 12 and change, etc. In addition to his stamina he also has some beautiful length to his stride, which becomes a great benefit to a horse once fatigue sets in with him and the other horses around him. The curse? Yeah, something to think about. But like other curses that have fallen in recent years, I think that one is going to fall soon enough as well. Is it this year? Maybe not, so while I might play him on top on a couple of tickets, he'll be on all my tickets as an underneath play at least.
Getting back to the Santa Anita Derby, that's not a race that I'm going to use much and transferring over to the Kentucky Derby. You had Hoppertunity who probably wasn't fully cranked. You had Candy Boy who was coming off a two month layoff and wasn't on form. Then you had a bunch of no-hopers filling out the field. California Chrome had everything working in his favour that race. He got to ride what was a very apparent track bias all spring by laying off a maiden over soft fractions on a track that was speed favouring to some historical levels. usually is a speed favouring track. But this track is was pretty ridiculous with how tight they roll that place and boosted speeds.
- A race or two before Chrome's San Felipe, a rather weak maiden runner named Nome wired the field and even opened up on them while running a final time of 1:08.95 over 6f. A time that, as is, is right there with the winners of the Breeders Cup Sprint times over the last 5 times it was run on a non-SA track. Nome's time was also two seconds faster than he had ever run at that distance in 6 tries before and since. From my understanding, he was always a horse that was on/near the lead, but folded from fatigue over the last furlong of a race. Not that day, though. He couldn't be caught.
- Of course, that same day we saw Game On Dude wire the field in the Big Cap, setting a stakes record by over a half a second in the process, and almost setting the world record for 10f. His final of 1:58.17 was only a couple of tenths off of Bid's record for the distance and was apx 1.5 seconds faster that Game On Dude had run before on that track. Obviously a very nice horse, but...
- The Day of the SA Derby we saw a 3 year-old maiden winner take a 7f race on the dirt in 1:21.64. A time that, as is, wins the 7f G1 King's Bishop 9 times out of 10. We saw a horse in a claimer on the dirt towards the end of the card win a 6f race in 1:08.27. Again, that time wins the last five non-SA Breeders Cup Sprint race and does so by open length. We had a mile race on dirt for claimers that was won in a time that compares favourably to some of the major G1 races at that distance.
- It was the California handicapper for DRF, Brad Free, wrote a couple of weeks ago that out of then-last 20 dirt races at SA, 14 were won via wire jobs, and the other 6 were won by sitting a length or two off the leaders. None of them came from any sort of position while running off the pace.
- Considering he just raced yesterday, we also had Bayern earlier in the year. Wires an okay allowance field on the SA track and did so by winning by over 15 lengths. A lot of people were raving about it and there was plenty of talk about him possibly being the eventual Kentucky Derby favourite. He gets taken off that track, runs on a couple of lackluster races on different ones, and now looks like he'd be one of the longest shots on the board if he had entered the Derby. A SA track bias and the appropriate running style seems to have flattered Bayern based on what we've seen over the last two.
I know a lot of people are very high on California Chrome and probably a few are on here as well. Can't say I'd blame them for that either, because I do too think he's very talented. I'm just not sure I see him as being nearly as talented when taken off that Blazing fast SA track, and thus he'll be a play against for me. Especially if he's 2-1 or thereabouts. I'll give him the chance to beat me and if he does it wouldn't be the first nor the last time it happens. But I'll be okay with that, though, because parts of me would love to see him transfer his form over and become a racing superstar over the next 5 weeks. Like any horse racing fan.
Again, my apologies for the length