Llo; 1st contribution to this heck of a thread, 1st i must thx ppl for a bunch of o/u wins since i undstd the zen system quite easily, now i just got a noobish question, what about dogs ? uh... i mean , r they the teams we shd bet on , or the losing ones... since humans lov dogs i'd go with the 1st hypothesis, but this thread is so complicated & full of acronyms & stuff that i can't b sure ... ty in adv. ppl & ty again for that cool zen sheet ! truly
yesterday's recap jj 3-0 he's hot, hot and mo hot. in fact got a email from his lawyer for me to cease and desist posting his picks. fuck him, im in china and attorneys can go fuck their selves (they must be going tout) zen 1-1 (but one was opp a jj play which was in the early pdws so not many bet anyway back in a few with all of today's info... ps. waldo (eddings) was 1-0 yesterday as well but i dont bet 3rd game of series unless the line moves against the OL
dont burn yourself out with all of those posts. everything you need to know is in post number 1 of the thread. i dont use all that many acronyms (other than waldo for my key umps) but i do use alot of abv or 1st letter for words like wtf=what the fuck, cause i cant type and write and spell like shit.
yes and no. all of the play's are based on the zen form (which were modified by oil to include mean, median and shorter cycles, and than were again modified by a person we hired with derivites experience that added also added exp smoothing and regdression analysis plus some major deriv calc into a seperate macro) the only ones that dont incorporate any zen calc are JJ ctp NL under and the PC road dog. but if you were just looking for any additional o/u zen's there were none on the pdws other than the two zen dogs that were in rev b. for those that want to work with the zens theirselves the basic calc is in the pdf file below
is there any chance of getting a Vis W/L label in the pivot table field list? I was wanting to check 2 Run R/L cover against these visiting favorites.
Can still do it with home victory margin, but it would make for a much more condensed easy to read pivot.
As it is now it's going to say "No" to the question of 2 Run R/L cover if the home team lost.
Can still do it with home victory margin, but it would make for a much more condensed easy to read pivot.
As it is now it's going to say "No" to the question of 2 Run R/L cover if the home team lost.
