EF, it is essentially a 50-state system (with the exception of the military and some other federal government branches).
If you get convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in Washington State, they transmit that conviction to the FBI and you should never pass a FFL background check again.
What seems to be confusing is if you're on active duty, and are convicted of a crime who does this?
Otherwise, there was another shooting (I forget which one) where the shooter should have been flagged by the NICS and was not. As a guess, there are probably a lot of paper and otherwise missing records in perhaps too many of our states.
Automobiles fulfill a legitimate need within our society.
A book has never directly killed anyone, that's a major stretch.
Try again.
EF, it is essentially a 50-state system (with the exception of the military and some other federal government branches).
If you get convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in Washington State, they transmit that conviction to the FBI and you should never pass a FFL background check again.
What seems to be confusing is if you're on active duty, and are convicted of a crime who does this?
Otherwise, there was another shooting (I forget which one) where the shooter should have been flagged by the NICS and was not. As a guess, there are probably a lot of paper and otherwise missing records in perhaps too many of our states.
That is one of the main issues, the NICS system is a disaster and the majority of states either don’t report the proper data, report incomplete data or don’t report it at all. Several of these recent mass shooters would have been flagged in the system if the proper data was submitted.
this is how bureaucracy fails
then rather than fix the problem and enforce existing laws, they pass new laws and new regulations that only impact law abiding citizens and STILL DON'T WORK effectively
so you base a new law, and it don't work so you pass a newer law and it don't work so you pass a new law....................................
as cosmetic bullshit to make politicians feel good about their own compassionate efforts and give them talking points to sell to their constituents under the guise of leadership
All lives matter to me, even illegals, Muslims and Asians
Even unborn black babies in the third trimester
why haven't the democrats stopped murders in Chicago, a city they've controlled for centuries, it's up to 600 already which dwarfs these mass murders which get so much attention
doesn't Chicago have tough gun control laws? how can they be failing so miserably?
Can you explain what you would like for Democrats to do to stop murders? A city they've controlled for centuries......
I'd like to know what sense you can make out of that
Perhaps arrest gang bangers and put them in jail? Maybe invest in urban infrastructure so people have a nice place to live and work? Perhaps encourage young black men to stop having kids and running off on the mom?
So the texas church shooting must be Republicans fault because it's a Republican state? Is that how this works? Lmaooooo.
Come on now let's act right.
So tired of this democrats vs republicans never ending fued. Fucking losers blaming each other.
But that still has nothing to do with the NRA advertising assualt rifles as sporting goods lol. What do you want the democrats to do about the killing in Chicago? Because it ks a democratic state you think they should do what? Lol it is the Republicans who will not do anything about gun control. They are the one's fighting it.
So I don't understand your point at all. Chicago murders are all democrats fault because it is a democratic state? Lol that has absolutely no logic to it. Not sure what you expect them to do? Magic wand?
Can you explain what you would like for Democrats to do to stop murders in Chicago? A city they've controlled for centuries......
I'd like to know what sense you can make out of that
It literally has nothing to do with what happened. Lmfao
Exactly. Ask Willie a question about the NRA, get a response about Chicago just to assess blame.
This is America. We are supposed to be problem solvers. We are supposed to never back down from challenges.
Mass killings are obviously a problem in our society. All the people who just throw up their hands and say "we just have to live with it" are the losers.
You guys crack me up. You think the NRA needs to come up with a solution, I don't, but you think I'm supposed to suggest how the NRA is supposed to solve the problem you want solved. Look up begging the question, figure it out, get back to me.
How is Chicago relevant? Because people like you scream "gun control" for the entire nation each and every time there's a shooting that garners national attention. Yet 600 have been killed in Chicago alone THIS FUCKING YEAR, and people who think like you and espouse the same policies you espouse run that city and y'all ignore it, never a whisper. Chicago had 4,000 victims of gun crimes in 2016, and the city has tougher gun laws than most of the rest of the country. Chicago blames most of the crimes on "illegally owned guns". GEE, NO FUCKING SHIT, CRIMINALS OWN GUNS ILLEGALLY, who could have ever thought of that?
How do you stop crime in Chicago? How about increased police patrols, increase exposure, increased lighting, increased cameras, increased arrests, putting people in jail, strictly enforcing unlawful gun possession, LOCK THEM UP. and when you've improved security, the community will work with you and begin to turn on the criminals, just like they did in Iraq after the surge. I'm not even talking about stuff like education and changing the culture, because that's a much longer term fix, butt it has to be noted that democrats and their community organizers had 100 years to fix that too, AND DID NOTHING OR FAILED AT EVERYTHING.
When you can't fix your own neighborhood, when the policies you espouse can't fix one city, then you have no right advising everyone else. (PS: Rudy fixed NYC, "real talk")
And now it's your turn fellas, let's hear how you propose we fix the gun crime problem and tell us when gun crimes became worse and why. Let's see you actually answer a question for a change instead of repeating talking points and headlines and 10 second sound bites.
I honestly don't know if the NRA has taken a position on how to stop mass killings. But they certainly have taken a position on what guns, magazines, and how many of each are to be legal.
Chicago is not relevant to the mass killings debate. Chicago's rate of violence is due to the drug trade, gang warfare, the perpetual underclass, and a total breakdown of respect and civility. There are many factors as to why poor people murder each other in urban settings, and many solutions are needed. A ban on certain types of weapons and magazines is only one part of a larger solution. And, you can't say a gun ban doesn't work when Chicago is a small island is a huge country where all guns are legal. It is like a dry county in Kentucky, where alcohol is produced and sold in all surrounding counties; a farce. But do people blame the Blue Laws for alcoholism in a dry county?
And in Chicago, all of those policing techniques I'm sure have been tried. Maybe those techniques have prevented 600 more murders this year? And, it takes more money (through higher taxes) to build prisons, hire cops, buy cameras, etc. Are you for higher taxes?
There is not one solution to mass killings. But, the solution is made up of many small solutions, amongst them are bans on certain types of weapons and magazines, waiting periods, background checks, closing gun show loopholes, more dollars for mental health treatment, etc.