WWTS said I have to wager 75% of deposit b4 withdrawl

[Holysmoke+]

NO offense but ..


A to B
B to C
C to A

looks a little like money luandering or something

 

[wilheim]

Odds Holysmoke has $10,000 to transfer:





Yes +9000

N0 -11000


wil.

 

[Holysmoke+]

Odds Holysmoke has $10,000 to transfer:





Yes +9000

N0 -11000


wil.

I like this forum too much to tell you what I (and many others) think of you wil.

gl 2 u

 

[Holysmoke+]

boy this is certainly a pro book forum though.

players are frowned down on by mods.

 

[Holysmoke+]

accused of lying and laundering in same post.

amazing

 

[Holysmoke+]

wil, I got an idea, you pay me those odds and Ill prove to the General that I have a 10k account.

What do you say?

 

[wilheim]

HS - get real will you. The odds are just a joke, if you can't take a little kidding then don't start threads about fantasy transfers.





wil.:think:

 

[Holysmoke+]

I am real, I started a thread about a phone call with wwts today about transfering book to book.

I never heard a fvkn thing before about roll over with cash, of course I have with bonus

so I came in here to ask if this is normal.

I then get bashed about fvkn money laundering and lying.

so why is this? because I offended a book?

 

[wilheim]

First of all who said you lied? I am not going to re-hash the whole thread with you but anyone with any kind of Offshore experience would know that once you send money to a book you need to at least bet part of it if you want the book to pay withdrawal fees. You act like the book is out of line when in fact no money was even sent. The entire issue is hypothetical in any case. Let me get this straight you want one book to transfer funds to another, then without betting any part of that transfer you want to withdraw those funds from the new book and will hold the book responsible for the withdrawal funds, is that correct?


wil.

 

[Holysmoke+]

ok, for the 1000th time,

I do not give a fvk about withdrawl fees

Jesus!!!!

I said the lady said no withdrawls PERIOD!!!!!!!!!

what will it take for you to understand that?

she said u cannot withdrawl a penny until u wager 75 %!

she didnt say u cant have a free withdrawl she said NO withdrawl.

In other words "IF" I made a deposit it was locked up good.

so I just wanted to know if that is normal

 

[IDENTITY]

Wil. This Man Wanted To Make A Transfer With His Money. Wwts Would Not Let Him Withdraw It At Will. Since When Do You Have To Bet If You Deposit????? If That Is The Case, What If You Deposit Into A Book When You Soon Learn The Book Doesn't Have 2nd Half Lines. Should You Have To Bet A Percentage Of Your Deposit?

Cmon Wil, Admit You Are Wrong In This Instance.

 

[wilheim]

In that case this thread was over with after Lakerfan posted.

100% seems more reasonable to me. Am sure you can get your money anytime if you are willing to cover the fees it cost them to get your money and send it to you. But when they cover fees you should have to bet balance at least once before w/d.
<!-- / message -->

I agree 100% if you wanted the money and were willing to pay the fees you would have no problem getting it back. Of course we will never know because this is a "once a upon a time" thread - in other words a fairy tail.


wil.

 

[Holysmoke+]

Ok wil, you win, so sorry I offended your favorite book.

would love it if you locked this SOB and I could let it rest.

Lesson learned today.... do not offend any sportsbooks at the rx

 

[Thrillseeker]

I'm not sure I follow why you would deposit to wwts and then transfer to pinny? why not just deposit to pinny in the first place if you know that's what you're going to do? Does pinny not offer your preferred method of deposit or something?

I don't think this is necessarily a good practice by wwts, but I can see why they would question all these maneuvers, and at least want an explanation...

 

[peteep]

I'm not sure I follow why you would deposit to wwts and then transfer to pinny? why not just deposit to pinny in the first place if you know that's what you're going to do? Does pinny not offer your preferred method of deposit or something?

I don't think this is necessarily a good practice by wwts, but I can see why they would question all these maneuvers, and at least want an explanation...

He has money in Pinny....was thinking about transfering to WWTS. Wow this thread has gone on for too long

 

[Holysmoke+]

I will say a prayer tonight that someone will close this thread, as it has gone over the heads of too many ppl.

 

[wilheim]

Holysmoke you get your wish.


wilheim

 

[DarrylParsons]

Proof that the policy in question is stupid...

The player could just do a Polish scalp and wager his 75% without any risk. This rule, therefore, is equivalent to charging a withdrawal fee equal to the juice on such a bet. To insist on actually making the play is just a waste of time for both parties.