WSEX POKER

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
171
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I play hearts on line and they will cheat to build their rating without a nickel profit being involved. They have 2 guys usually playing together on the phone with each other to beat you and there is absolutely no prize money to be won!! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
this says it all.

great post patrick
 
Who said anything about me trying to back you up or vice versa?? Newsflash pinhead - I posted my take BEFORE you did. You think I or several thousands of others professional card players don't have a million instances of blatant cheating on the internet? I'm not guessing or making stuff up just to write a post for fun, this stuff happens everywhere and is impossible to prevent from happening! I stand 100% behind what I posted then and what I am posting now! I don't need an endorsement from some chucklehead like you boy. As I said this is not a commentary on WSEX or their individual sight but if anyone thinks they have a magical way to stop team poker or countless other ways to cheat than they are mistaken. I like WSEX for football betting actually but poker is another matter. There is no site on the internet that anyone could recommend for live poker with a straight face if they know what they are talking about and have any kind of integrity. Let me repeat so Ironhead can hear this again:

ANYONE THAT PLAYS LIVE POKER OVER THE INTERNET IS A SUCKER!!!

The game I was at last night 3 gentlemen where bragging about how they were tearing up a 10-20 Omaha game on one of the sites. When I spoke up and said it's nice to hear what kind of integrity you guys have, it was almost a 100% agreement around the table that anybody stupid enough to play poker on line deserves to get fleeced. I haven't played against him but they say there is another guy in this same crowd that has 8 terminals at his house and fills 8 seats regularly at the same game. All with different IP numbers. Kind of tough to beat that guy especially when he is a card shark to boot. I won't mention the site they are scamming because it happens at all of them. And before someone tells me the ways to stop this there are 50 more ways to cheat than what I have mentioned. I'm trying to give people a heads-up here. Do you think that I benefit in any way from this thread?

And Ironhead, don't know who you think you are talking to but like Poppa Irish said to me, the next time you EVER raise a hand to me it better be to ask me a question.

I'M PATRICK MCIRISH AND THE EDUCATIONARY CLASSES ARE ALWAYS FREE ON MONDAY MORNINGS!!!!! /infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
600
Tokens
After removing the hook from your mouth contact me if you play gin. I'm not very good at it myself and I can just tell you are a top player like in poker.

Patrick I'm not much for gin, but let's set up a Hold'em match. WSEX has 1 on 1 (no collusion possible)tables $10/20 and $20/40. Let's put up a $1,000 each and play for it all. Say today at 4PM (EST)?

/infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif
 

We are EVERYWHERE !!
Joined
Jan 21, 2000
Messages
6,452
Tokens
One of the things I liked a LOT about WSEX was that they were a pure sportsbook. No annoying casino ads flashing at you while you were on to make sports wagers. WSEX did one thing and did it better than almost anyone else out there.

I have absolute faith in the integrity of WSEX and its staff. But I also know that a bunch of stink will come from the poker side of it. Poker brings a different breed than sports wagering and all the good intentions of WSEX won't stop the scammers and cheaters from taking their shots. I just hope the stink doesn't spill over into the sportsbook side. That would be a shame.

I guess Olympic is the last high class "pure sportsbook" now.

Also....thanks Patrick McIrish for some great posts. Between you and the movie "Rounders" I don't think I will EVER play poker again !!
 
Thanks Zapster. Rounders was by far the most realistic poker movie ever made. Your comments about poker players is right on. I tried to make it clear but my commentary is not on WSEX at all. I believe them when they say they will make every effort. Just know from experience it won't be enough.

Cardfather - In my zest to post perhaps I did come on too strong. I painted with a broad brush by using the word sucker but really do not mean you personally. You seem like my kind of guy actually. You saked up. Unfortunately I will have to pass on the $1000 challenge. Like I said I am not interested in playing poker on-line. Heads up or not. I'm a dinossaur I suppose. Besides the safety concerns, part of the McIrish winning poker strategy is to look for little things called tells. Habits and trends that players do that will reveal the relative strength of their hand without them realizing it. May be something as obvious as his smoking patterns on big hands or as obscure as how much force he pushes his chips in with when bluffing. If you play at all you know what I am referring to. In 1 on 1 it is even more critical. I need every edge I can get to swing the tide in my favor. In on-line poker that part of an experienced players game is useless. I do like limit Hold 'em in that range though. Either 15/30 or 20/40 is great for me. Tell you what if you come to Flordia let me know. We can set this thing up then. /infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Again if I came on like a jerk it was not my complete intention. Playing on-line is dangerous, very dangerous. I do see that you have at least moved down in the size of the game you are playing. Good move. As always....


I'M PATRICK MCIRISH AND YOU'VE JUST BEEN EDUCATED!!!
 
http://www.scobi.com/index.shtml


While this guy sounds like a sore loser this scene is repeated over and over again. He's right about a lot of it.

If I was RX I would break out this section and start an on-line poker section. You would have a lot of visitors. Advertise in Card Player and Poker's Digest. The sky is the limit.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
12
Tokens
"Rounders was by far the most realistic poker movie ever made."

Wow.

I've been posting in poker forums for a lot longer than I've been posting in sportsbetting forums.

I've read over a million posts about "Rounders".

Yours was the first I've ever seen to contain the words "most" and "realistic" listed consecutively.

I disagree with your assertion that the threat of collusion makes online games unplayable. I'm not saying that it can not or will not happen. But I know many successful on-line players, and even if the problem is rampant, it has not kept them from showing a healthy profit.

I hope that you won't call me names now.

Bobby
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
1,272
Tokens
Patrick-
You are a bigger idiot than I assumed.

"Rounders is the most realistic poker movie ever made"....

That statement reveals your utter lack of anything that may resemble poker knowleadge. I bet Rounders probably inspired you to try poker, and you walked out of the game BUST, with your tail between your legs in under an hour.

Believe me, I've been around this block alot longer than your sorry loudmouth ignorance spewing ass, and if you keep it up...you will soon realize what a relentless spur in your ass I can become.

You may be right about the danger of cheating, but that doesn't change the fact that you one ignorant son of a bitch in general. I dont need to lay that case out for you, you did so already in record time.....

iron.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8
Tokens
Where did they go? I enjoyed Rounders too as I haven't seen many decent poker flicks at all. What other good ones are out there?

Maybe they were just trying to make Patrick mad? /infopop/emoticons/icon_redface.gif
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
1,272
Tokens
The key word here is "Realistic"....

As in, 'Independance day' is the most "realistic" action movie ever made.

Think about it.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8
Tokens
I'll stay out of this one because he has obviously upset you guys but I too thought that it was very realistic with the poker action. Evidently you guys don't know of a more realistic one either or you would have brought it up by now. I liked Rounders and for the first time it wasn't guys throwing plastic chips in a pot betting out of turn. Matter of fact is was the first poker movie about hold 'em that I can recall. I'm only 35 maybe there was others before then.

Think I'll leave as I know you are angry and don't want you angry at me. If you do think of a more realistic poker movie I would be interested in seeing it myself. If you think of one could you post the title here? Thanks.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
1,272
Tokens
Sodium...thanks. I too thought this post said it all, I went there looking for it, but search wasn't working..

"Rounders, a great movie?
The one where you can cash a check for 10k late at night and get...10k?

The one where municipal employees can afford to play shorthanded 20-40?

The one where the hero cheats early in the movie, but later, when his life is on the line, insists on playing it straight?

The one where the hero can walk into a room having missed the early rounds of a stud game of people he's never played with, and still know what everyone has?

The one where apparently no one heard of cutting the cards?

The one where the hero, in the movie's start, asks for 3 stacks of high society instead of 3 racks?

The one where he goes over the top for an all-in raise in a spot where his opponent either has a flush and probably can't call such a raise, or has what he has--ace's full--in which case he BEATS your raise?

The one where the hero is basically blowing his brains out even getting in that situation anyway because he's putting his whole BR--30k--into play in a game--no limit--he's never or rarely played before? Yes he says something about his life having become a grind, but it's an idiot's move, a BR suicide, not a play for move up.

The one where the hero plans on winning the 15k or whatever they need to stay alive playing 20-40 and such for a weekend? They could at least have shown him taking drugs to stay up that long (which in the movie he did with no ill effect), because you'd have to be on drugs to think you're going to win that much in a game that small.

The one where the "hero" brings his cheating friend to a deal-your-own card room where his other friends play? And he puts the cheat in action?

And there's more, this is off the top of my head.

The one where the juice on a guy's street debts runs while he's in the joint?

The one where the whole reason the hero decides he's a great poker player is because ONE time he ran ONE bluff in a limit game against a famous tournament junkie, Johnny Chan? THAT was the source of his confidence?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
12
Tokens
No, I'm not mad at anybody. I'm at work, and sometimes real life gets in the way.

You cannot make a realistic poker movie. Not if you want to make a profit on it, anyway. Movies have to be exciting. A poker movie has to be full of straight-flushes four-of-a-kinds. The public just won't believe you can get rich by winning little pots.

Also, there must be a law in Hollywood that says you've got to have cheating in every poker scene. I don't know why this is. I don't see past-posting schemes in movies that take place at the racetrack.

I've always maintained that "Rounders" was not a POKER movie; it was a CHEATING movie.

I've been playing in public cardrooms for 10 years now. Cheating plays a very small part in the life of an every-day player. You keep your eye for it, and you play in well-regulated cardrooms to protect yourself. I've only once suspected cheating in a Vegas cardroom. It was pretty obvious to spot. I quit the game before they could deal another hand.

That's it. One incident in 10 years.

Matt Damon and his pals had an incident every 10 MINUTES.

I've been over to rec.gambling.poker, and ran a search on Rounders and Authentic.

Someone over there once made a great post, listing the major flaws of the film. It was quite a list. If he wanted to nit-pick, he could've made a list three-times longer. Unfortunately, I couldn't find that precise post.

But I found this one, which will do in a pinch:


All of the pre-movie hype had me thinking that we were finally gonna see a
movie about poker that really sends the message home. Having criticized this
movie before it came out I was hoping against hope I made a mistake. I figured
I would have to eat some serious crow. Isn't being able to admit your mistakes
the sign of a winning player? Well, I did make a mistake, a big mistake. This
movie was much worse than I thought it would be! It was EMBARRASSING! What a
disgrace to the industry! Made us all look like a bunch of loan sharks,
mobsters and thieves!

Will someone please tell me where poker is played this way?

If you didn't know anything about playing cards before your viewing you
would think it was still a game played by the lowest of low life scum, all
there to fleece and cheat innocent looking conventioneers and college kids that
haven't got a clue. They kept emphasizing the skill aspect of the game but why
bother with that when you can get the money by using much easier methods. "We
aren't playing together so to speak, but, well, yes we are." (The implication
being that we are all a bunch of conniving crooks.)

Opening poker scene: Matt Damon snakes his way through the labyrinth maze
of brick and cement to find his way to the dungeon of death. A bar slides open
and he enters. The owner of the club himself is there to sell him his "three
stacks of high societies." Huh? What? Why the ridiculous lingo. Who talks
like this? Just give me 30 dimes and I'll find a game. (30 dimes, I'm still
laughing) He doesn't even check out the games first. Why not look to see who
is playing and how much money is on the table?

Of course, we all know this is a movie and in the movies allowances are
made. Expert collaborators are always employed but the one they hired for this
flick must have been off gallivanting with the local Monica Lewinsky for hire
because this movie had more mistakes, inaccuracies and downright laughable
scenes than "Something about Mary."

I guess that back east they don't:

1. CUT THE CARDS! (I guess cutting the cards is cinematically clumsly)
2. Cap their own cards. (When you're playing for dollars let alone
thousands aren't you going to protect your own damn hand!)
3. Burn a card
4. Put a cap card on the bottom of the deck (This kind of puts the kibosh
on bottom dealing)
5. Shuffle their chips
6. Stack their chips
7. Bet in a manner other than splashing them all over the place (You
would think that such great players could at least handle their chips in a
professional manner. No. Everyone bets in units of 10 or 20, or just throws
them into the middle of the pot.)
8. Talk without using metaphors (Their gonna do more than put a finger up
your spine--why not just say, "their gonna bust your ass if you **** around
with the deck dumb shit.")
9. Oh, and getting credit just by asking for it must be a New York way of
life. Especially for fresh face college kids with a delivery job or just
released cons with lots of talent!
10. Shuffle. Did you catch the way Worm shuffled the cards? Nobody
shuffles like that! (And gets away with it)

Will somebody please give me a break!


Still and all, I didn't believe these guys as poker players. They were
just too young. Too inexperienced. Most poker players are just starting out
about the time these guys were supposed to be great pros.

And the cheating. Oh my goodness, whose idea was that?!

I knew they'd blow this movie. And believe me, I HATE being right.

Every single poker scene had serious flaws. That is what I was dreading.
Will anybody EVER get it right?

Oh and get this. Off duty cops just happen to have two tables of 20-40
going. Maybe 2-4 or 5-10 but TWO tables of 20-40? Not hardly. Then what
happens? One of the cops picks up a complete stranger at the BOWLING ALLEY and
brings him back to the game! Talk about a plot stretch. I just kept sinking
deeper and deeper into my chair. But don't worry. Damon had this game beat
for $4200!! $4200 is a SUPER win! Happens once or twice a year! (If that.
In fact, I have NEVER won $4200 in a 20-40 game!) Man; just take a hike when
your stupid friend shows up. You're a bright college kid--the best poker
player in town. A sharp pro beyond your years. No. I guess I'll stick around
and let my FRIEND deal me roll ups the rest of the night! In a room full of
cops your gonna try and pull that shit? Oh I forgot. This is the most
authentic poker movie ever made. But even if they DID catch them cheating they
would probably just take their money and throw their asses out. But no. It
was a knock down dirty punch out brawl. Cops no less. Those poor boys.

Remember the scene where Damon is talking to Turturro about when Johnny
Chan got into the poker game in Atlantic City. Every poker player in the room
and all of the CRAPS players stopped what they were doing to go over and watch
him play. Hello? Anybody in the aquarium? But hey, what are a few minor
errors? Right?

Couldn't they have hired a few local pros to sit in some of the poker
scenes to make it even LOOK real? The real scam in this movie is the expert
they hired to make sure everything looked "authentic." This guy must be half
way to Mexico by now. (Anybody out there? I'm available, and I would have
done it for half the price.)

And the next time you need a stake just sit in a game next to your friend
and grab a couple of stacks off of his pile. All experienced players know that
this is how it is done.

Oh, and if you need 10 grand. Simple. There is always a sympathetic
judge around to lend you some scratch.

Besides, when you double your 10K twice in the climactic scene and turn it
into 60K, you're always gonna end up just fine.

Other than that, I really liked the movie. * * Two stars

BobA928674

**********

(I didn't write the post that I pasted here, even though the author has the same first name--Bobby)
 

New member
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
2,545
Tokens
I seen two guys get throwed out of the sands in ac for cheating.this post only makes me think of calling a few buddies,go on a three way call the start a game..On second thought we could still get ROBBED.Know way I ever play!
 
Is it just me or am I totally lost here? Are these guys trying to prove to me that on-line poker is safe because of these movies? One guy says I only caught people cheating once in 10 years playing poker so that is the only time it existed. /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif Oh man. I was once told when you argue with a fool they drag you down to their level and down there they have tons of experience on you. My experience is in the poker rooms. 'Nuff said!

If you have played in public cardrooms my friend you have run across players playing teams more often than once in 10 years. LOL!!! You just were too dumb to catch it. Perhaps the light on this side of the forum isn't very good. Perhaps because Rounders was a bad movie (still haven't seen a name yet of a better poker movie thrown out there) they are missing the point of this thread. Again, slower this time.

I F - Y O U - P L A Y - P O K E R - O N L I N E - Y O U - A R E - A - S U C K E R ! ! !

Reading is fundamental gents. If you want to argue with the Irishman you must be able to read and understand the language. While I am impressed deeply by you two movie buffs (look out Siskel & Ebert) you have shown to be pretty naive and simple-minded when it comes to gambling. Perhaps lining up at the tables in cyberspace to play cards is a good place for you gents. If people only cheat once every 10 years you guys should be pretty safe. LOL! /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Either of you guys happen to see Bambi when it was in theaters? If you did you couldn't have missed the part where the lion dealt seconds to the zebra. That stuff has only happened once in 25 years at the zoo by my house though. I'll be up a while if either of you have time to break down Lion King later. /infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

THE NAME IS PATRICK EUGENE MCIRISH - THE EDUCATION IS FREE ON MONDAY EVENINGS!!!!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
12
Tokens
"...you have shown to be pretty naive and simple-minded when it comes to gambling."

That is funny on SO many levels.

I've been flamed before. But that one leaves me speechless. You'll never know *why* I find that line so funny. People who know me, though, are going to find that line VERY amusing.

I didn't fire back a more realistic poker movie, because I've NEVER seen realistic poker movie.

But of course, I'm "pretty naive and simple-minded when it comes to gambling."

(I just cannot articulate how FUNNY that line is!)

I've been called "simple-minded" by a guy who says, "I know much more about the subject than anyone with EXPERIENCE in it POSSIBLY could."

I've been called "simple-minded" by guy who refuses to consider the testimony of players who have played 100's of hours; are convinced the games are AT LEAST as clean as B+M (Brick and Mortar) poker rooms; and have the track record to show that these games are at least as beatable as the B+M games.

I've been called "naive" by a guy who has NO IDEA how much I know about cheating.

That's the kicker. I know more about cheating than any gambler I've ever spoken with (OK, there's one floorman at Binion's poker room who's got me beat).

But clearly, this Irish guy knows much more about internet poker than the rest of us. I'm willing to give in. Why throw good posts after bad? /infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Bobby
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
600
Tokens
Is there collusion in online poker?
Yes

Will they be caught.....certainly....re-read the WSEX post. Roy Cooke and Mike Caro monitor another well publicized poker site. They are 2 of the greatest minds in poker.

Is there collusion in live poker?
Yes

I know Tony S. very well. He knows several teams that work the live games. Collusion is very difficult to prove in games like 7 card stud, pot limit omaha ......etc....

The bottom line is........Can I win in on/offline poker even with these negatives?

Is Rounders a realistic Poker movie?
LOL....Only someone who plays very little would say something like that.

Nice back pedal Patrick. I kinda thought you would decline my heads up challenge. You talk a great game though. The tells and all. There is some relevance to what your saying, but to an experienced player, collusion is all too obvious. Too bad you don't have more confidence in your abilities. You claim that you located a sucker.....yet your unwilling to put your $$$$ where your mouth is. I've heard paranoia's like yourself spew many times. I find it is most often the trait of a loser.

If you couldn't stomach or don't have $1,000 to put up......I'll play you for $500 at WSEX 1 on 1 anytime.

Let's get it on @ hold'em Patrick. To make it even more interesting ...... loser has to post what a great player the other one is. /infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

/infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif /infopop/emoticons/icon_cool.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,624
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com