Mr. Smith, I'm not offered +1's from my wagering site. How would you break up these bets if you could only play the teams straight up? My site has Honduras +610 and a draw +290, and it has Chile +660 and a draw +300. Maybe 3 units on each of Honduras and Chile, and 1 unit on a draw for each? Thanks again for your time and best of luck in your future plays!
Not a good idea... but if you have no "goals" odds then I guess that's the only option. Just don't bet as much since you already have + money on both the ML and Draw. Maybe 1u & 1u. Because if both Spain and Swiss win by 1 goal then your bets are losses whereas the +1 ends up to be tie (no play).
I really dont know. I dont like betting underdogs on those 3 way lines. Also, Chile does not need to win, only tie. they have to play hard because if its 1-1 late and Spain scores, depending on the other game Chile could be out. but in the end they are happy with a draw.but if you bet them to draw and they win, you lose. its a tough bet
USA and Ghana both attack, no playing back and waiting. I could not believe this line when I saw it, then I thought a little more and I can see why its 2, but still I think it should be 2.5
USA 3 games have had 7 goals. Ghana 4 goals in 3 games. Not many. 2.3 for USA 1.33 for Ghana. But...
USA had 2 taken away for no apparent reason. That would bump them to 3.0. they also played two tough defensive teams in England and Algeria, who conceded very little. But USA does attack and attack.
Ghana beat Serbia 1-0. having watched that, its almost unbelievable there was only 1 goal. late a Ghana player hit the post missing an empty net. the whole game was a back and forth track meet. Ghana attacked relentlessly, Serbia attacked relentlessly right back. But they both missed so many great chances.
Ghana vs Aussies. Aussies had their star striker sent off red carded after 20 minutes on a ridiculous call with a 1-0 lead, leaving them with 10 men and no offensive threat the rest of the way. they never threatened again. they held on for a 1-1 draw, but had they had their striker and 11, game should have been higher scoring. Aussies lost 70 minutes where they could not attack. this one would have had more goals if Aussies had not been victimized.
Ghana-Germany- Germany is very difficult to score on. Always has been that way. So not surprising 1-0 Germany win, no goals for Ghana.
But USA defense can be had and USA attacks relentlessly no matter who they play. Ghana will too, they just need to finish better. Should be many chances here.
over 2 4 units
1 unit USA -125
USA 3 games have had 7 goals. Ghana 4 goals in 3 games. Not many. 2.3 for USA 1.33 for Ghana. But...
USA had 2 taken away for no apparent reason. That would bump them to 3.0. they also played two tough defensive teams in England and Algeria, who conceded very little. But USA does attack and attack.
Ghana beat Serbia 1-0. having watched that, its almost unbelievable there was only 1 goal. late a Ghana player hit the post missing an empty net. the whole game was a back and forth track meet. Ghana attacked relentlessly, Serbia attacked relentlessly right back. But they both missed so many great chances.
Ghana vs Aussies. Aussies had their star striker sent off red carded after 20 minutes on a ridiculous call with a 1-0 lead, leaving them with 10 men and no offensive threat the rest of the way. they never threatened again. they held on for a 1-1 draw, but had they had their striker and 11, game should have been higher scoring. Aussies lost 70 minutes where they could not attack. this one would have had more goals if Aussies had not been victimized.
Ghana-Germany- Germany is very difficult to score on. Always has been that way. So not surprising 1-0 Germany win, no goals for Ghana.
But USA defense can be had and USA attacks relentlessly no matter who they play. Ghana will too, they just need to finish better. Should be many chances here.
over 2 4 units
1 unit USA -125
