Punter, what did Wiki prove and why?
The Wiki author himself appears to have his own bias in the story, thus his one sided presentation.
But what of my facts do you think it disproves? Like doc, you post a whole lot of shit which others have to sift through to try and figure out what you're saying.
What do you think it disproves and why?
I never run from any issue ever, no need to, so get a fucking clue already. How childish it is to sit by your computer and say "they didn't respond in 5 minutes already". I have to support my family the the base of the Democratic party y'know. Plus with doc spamming his ignorant nonsense 19 hours a day (literally), it's easy to overlook a post and / or a thread. I answer 100% of all questions aksd of me, not like the fucking
.000 crowd.
Everything in your original post, according to wiki, was a lie.
If you choose to stand by what the swiftboat PAC said and fox news and rush back up and ignore whats being recorded for history then you should never be able to say that my post "never believe a republican" is ignorant.
You said that the PAC's story was backed up by the crews of 5 other boats but they only produced 1 witness that was actually there.
Now who is being bullheaded and ignorant?