no, not prevented it from happening but maybe not as severe. maybe. idk but trying to wrap my head around it and be proactive as opposed to sitting around and having this discussion again in a few weeks. we all want the same thing but how we get there is debatable. so how do you suggest we stop it in the future?
Saw this today. From local news on a Dallas, TX ABC affiliate.
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhRpkeLs25IIXz9FKv
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhRpkeLs25IIXz9FKv
Hard drugs are illegal and people can still get them so that means they will still get Ar-15s even if banned? Worst analogy again.
People need drugs because they are addicted. To compare drugs and Ar-15s is comical. Nobody is getting sick from not shooting an Ar-15 today. That is why people still get drugs even when they are illegial. But getting Ar-15s when they are banned....and to say school massacres will still happen as consistent, using an Ar-15....you're a fool
People need drugs because they are addicted. To compare drugs and Ar-15s is comical. Nobody is getting sick from not shooting an Ar-15 today. That is why people still get drugs even when they are illegial. But getting Ar-15s when they are banned....and to say school massacres will still happen as consistent, using an Ar-15....you're a fool
"Banning Ar-15s won't stop the problem, people will just use handguns."
First off yes they are the problem. Second off, good. Use handguns. I bet you 3-4 people die before dude is tackled to the ground and beaten by fists to the death. So I am sure millions of Americans would take that compared to more massacres. So how does that not help the problem tremendously?
Next....Ar-15s the only reason they aren't banned is because they are considered "sporting" goods.
Mix guns with sports and you can't lose. Make it a competitive thing in this country and it will always be around.
When there's an accident involving an automobile, is it the person or the car that's responsible for the accident?
Inanimate objects are not evil, they have no consciousness, they have no thoughts, they have no motives, but people possess all of those traits
Punishing scores of millions of law abiding citizens is not the solution
You want a perfect world? free of wars and senseless killing? Then we need to eradicate mankind. I would start with the middle east and the South Side of Chicago
Inanimate objects are not evil, they have no consciousness, they have no thoughts, they have no motives, but people possess all of those traits
Punishing scores of millions of law abiding citizens is not the solution
You want a perfect world? free of wars and senseless killing? Then we need to eradicate mankind. I would start with the middle east and the South Side of Chicago
it's always the person's fault, not the inanimate object, that's common sense
PS: there are many people killed intentionally with vehicles, I'm sure you've heard about them too
I have a revolver with 5 .410 defense loads in it and a 9mm with a 10 shot clip sitting next to it in my drawer next to my bed.....one for each hand. My AR sits in my safe just because if my wife is alone she can shoot either of the pistols easier. In one way I almost wish they would ban AR's just to shut up the liberal faction with their heads up their ass. 5 years from now there would be just as many if not more school shootings if nothing else is done. Then what would they say. When I was in high school we had loaded shotguns laying in our backseat during hunting season and if our principal came out and saw them he would ask what model was it and what load we had in. I don't ever remember hearing of school shootings in the 70s of course we didn't have the fucked up media sensationalizing everything back then either.
Youre right but mentally ill people shouldn't be able to buy any guns and that's what happened there. He was a known mentally ill person still buying guns.
Two handguns with nineteen 10-15 round mags.
But that was one of the first times shit ever went down at a school since columbine. And the dude was walking around in the school peaking Into clases who had the most kids so obviously he is going to kill a lot of people when you do that. First time it was at a college I believe and the classes were in the same vicinity. If he had an AR-15 might be 100+ dead.
You'd lose that bet. Statistically, handguns are more likely to be used in a mass shooting than a rifle. Off the top of my head, the Giffords shooting and Charleston Church shooting used handguns. It's not like if you're shot with an AR at close range you're dead, but if you're shot with a .45 at close range you rub some dirt on it and walk it off. If the shooting is taking place at close range, a handgun will kill just as many as a rifle.
I'm not opposed to banning all guns. I'd rather fight with my hands than with guns. That's just me.
Hand guns, just use two and it's pretty deadly too. But I think v tech was a rare case of one person executing his plan very well. That dude had to of been trained. Grandfather was in ww2 or something. And it lasted over 3hours from when he first attacked. 3hour killing spree. Authorities failed.
The angry kid who wants to shoot up everybody all at one time is going for that Ar-15 though.
Hand guns, just use two and it's pretty deadly too. But I think v tech was a rare case of one person executing his plan very well. That dude had to of been trained. Grandfather was in ww2 or something. And it lasted over 3hours from when he first attacked. 3hour killing spree. Authorities failed.
The angry kid who wants to shoot up everybody all at one time is going for that Ar-15 though.
