I wouldnt doubt that you'd see less teams. In fact, I would like to see no more than 24 teams in any of the leagues. Spread the talent around fewer teams. Would make for better competition, in my opinion.
1) Participation in high school football is slightly down the last 1-2 years -- but if you go back to 2005 (or so), the participation is up. So it isn't as though the NFL is currently suffering from lack-of-talent thru the high school & college pipeline.
2) Not many QB stars right now, but that's just a short-term fluke -- with all the kids playing football year-round, and the summer camps, and the video/playbook coaching, think of all the QB whiz-kids who will eventually enter the NFL.
As others said, you can go back 20-30 years, and find some TERRIBLE years for QB play. I mean, Neil O'Donnell made a Super Bowl -- and Bubby Brister won some games, Shaun King, David Carr, John Friesz, Jon Kitna. All these guys started several games in the NFL.
Too much of the read option in college. It handicaps a cfb D, but doesnt work well in the NFL
I agree with this. It doesn't prepare college QB's for the NFL.
So many QB draft busts in the last few years.
Recency effect. There are always QB busts.
Andre Ware, Rick Mirer, Todd Marinovich, Heath Shuler, Jim Druckenmiller, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Akili Smith?
All 1st-round QB picks, back in the 1990s --- you know, when the college QBs were better prepared for the NFL. Ahem.
You forgot the Seahawks #1 pick in 1991, Dan McGwire.
So because there have always been QB draft busts, your point is what? That you think QB play in the NFL is as good as ever?
There hasn't been an expansion team since Houston -- and during that time, exposure & money has gone up up up.
The NFL has many problems, but "too many teams" isn't one of them. The numbers/money simply don't support that theory.
Too many teams equals watered down product. That was my point.. The fact money is up , is in spite of the level of play.