What QAnon the Right Wing Cult is All About

[savage1]

Last CALL for the author of the QUACKA"NALLS" to respond to this as posted in #3798:

Two quick things for now from the IVU Thread today:

1)"Inexpicably" no mention of Trump anywhere re:Maxwell matter-how come??

For me it just another case of one way reporting and hatred and accusations directed at noted Democrats(the Clintons) only.

2) Nothing said what I asked about Tom Hanks in previous post regardinf his PRESENT whereabouts/home.

 

[savage1]

It looks like we close the day with no response from the IVU Thread what was posted in post 3801.

Historically speaking like Trump, when they are confronted with stuff for which they have no the standard response is "fake news" or to

ignore it as is the case here or pretend that didn't see what was posted in the first place.

For me that translates to three words-ACCOUNTABILITY/lack of), LIARS and LOSERS!!

 

[savage1]

I see nothing posted at IVU Unit which is going t change the outcome of the Election, which is my big concern.

Also I see no response to questions posed in 3801 and were asked several times yesterday.

What I think has to be considered here is that even if there is some truth to any of the accusations hurled against Biden re:conspiracy theories and scandals, to

be blunt, to get it any of it and proven between now and Election Day is highly unlikely as stuff like this usually takes many months if not years

to happen.

Also most of the people in county are so focused on CURRENT stuff like the Virus, the Economy, Jobs, the Stock ,Market Protests, Riots, Race Relations and

in general what is going to affect them and now much PERSONALLY, imo stuff like alleged Biden scandals, etc are going to be way in the far outreaches

of their minds in any event.

Also and lets be real here, Democrats as well as Republicans both have a lot in their bag of tricks so to speak.

In this case it might mean that accusations hurled at Biden could be countered by ones hurled at Trump.

Also, both Democrats and Republicans have members in Congress and in other key places who are adept at stalling techniques, which

in this case would mean dragging any charges against Biden. Obamagate, etc. well past Election Day, which would negate most if not all

on people changing their opnions.

 

[savage1]

Typical "Q"UACKAnon LOSER:

I strongly suggest that you read this article in its entirety as an indication of what colossal failures they are but also that they are DANGEROUS, and why the FBI

considers them a potential terrorist threat:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/qanon...lorado-gave-her-customers-diarrhea?ref=scroll

Back later as it is lawn tractor cutting time on this beautiful day!!

 

[festeringZit]

This dumb fuck named savage was turning 60 years old and he had done nothing but FAIL in life to meet a woman/wife. Anyone shocked that no woman would want to be with this scumbag? Probably not. He has to go to a foreign Country to buy a woman willing to spread her legs for a green card. Finally, success!

Now he is 75 and a full time internet troll. He has a wife who most likely feels like nothing but a prisoner in her own home and she has an old ass husband who sits on the internet every day trolling people with non stop hypocrisy

On top of that he was banned at 2 other forums because everybody hated his guts and he didn't have a single friend at either forum. Not one

Now the scumbag is here pumping his totally biased agenda and already everybody fuckin hates the guy.

What a shitty fuckin life this asshole lives

The sick, retarded maggot troll is now laughing about wanting Trump shot and killed. He needs to be banned immediately, like he was at the other forums.

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1160912

 

[savage1]

The sick, retarded maggot troll is now laughing about wanting Trump shot and killed. He needs to be banned immediately, like he was at the other forums.

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1160912

I just apologized in the Political Forum, said it was in jest, and stated that Trump should do the same for what he

advocated his followers do to Hillary during one of his speeches during the 2016 Campaign.

It cuts both ways

 

[festeringZit]

I just apologized in the Political Forum, said it was in jest, and stated that Trump should do the same for what he

advocated his followers do to Hillary during one of his speeches during the 2016 Campaign.

It cuts both ways

Nope, you are lying out your ass as usual.

Fucking lying libtard.

 

[savage1]

Nope, you are lying out your ass as usual.

Fucking lying libtard.

You are lying out of your ass if ycu claim that you are NOT a RACIST and for that matter don't think Trump is one also.

You can interpret this any way you want-I know what I think:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment

 

[savage1]

Briefly.

I see nothing whatsoever at the IVU Thread today, which is going to have any effect of current pollind data and thus who is going to win the Election.

On the other hand, while it may not have any effect on the Election, the Supreme Court ruling yesterday gives Trump a lot to worry about

as evidenced by Trump's response.

Imo provided the Statue of Limitations doesn't apply/run out, the people who are going to sue him for past transgressions are going to have to "take a number"

as they do in the deli to wait for their turn to present their own particular case against this PATHOLOGICAL LIAR and CRIMINAL!

 

[savage1]

For those of you who are new here and confused by what the "Q"UACKAnons , I mean "Q"Anons are about, and who want a quick summary

rather than plowing through all of the posts and those of the IVU thread, which this in response to, I suggest you do the following:

Read Post 1 in his thread.

Go to post 68 and follow the two links.

 

[savage1]

Real fast as only several things stand out:

1) There are a barrage of posts today which are nothing but rehashes of previous posts.

This tells me that desperation is setting in as h and the "Q"UACKAnons know that it is most likely that Trump is going to lose.

2) Tom Hanks is cited in child trafficking, but the authors of the thread still after three attempts has not answered my question whether

Hanks is in Gitmo, where he has allegedly been for a while according to him.

If he is there, then he needs to comment on the interview I saw the other night at HIS HOME the other night with Lester Holt, and how his could be.

Not commenting on it just further corroborates what I have always said about him and his group, namely lack of accountability.

3) From what I have read there, there is at least as good a chance that Trump himself was involved in child trafficking years ago

as the folks he cites.

 

[savage1]

More than one can play the Child Trafficking Accusation Game:


https://www.bing.com/search?q=trump...d98cb4cf3a7d184da02d2c324&FORM=ANAB01&PC=DCTS

 

[savage1]

Re: the IVU Thread , there is nothing new over there but more of the same way lies and nonsense and unproven bullshit, now bordering

on desperation as the author is finally getting it into his thick ahead that Trump isn't going to win.

I see a long post over there re; Joe Biden and Maxwell, but ZERO mention of Trump's name re: the same matter-what does that tell you?

I see some vague reference to Tom Hanks and GITMO, BUT ONCE AGAIN I BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION THAT I HAVE NOW MADE FOR REQUESTS

OF SBD TO TELL US HOW HANKS COULD BE IN GITMO FOR A LONG TIME INASMUCH AS I AND MILLIONS OF OTHER PEOPLE SAW HIM

BEING INTERVIEWED IN HIS HOME THIS WEEK BY LESTER HOLT ON NBC NEWS, AND HE HAS NOT RESPONDED!!!

Stuff like this has happened too many times to count since I started this thread in reference to what he said in his thread.

To be blunt, SBD is a LIAR and a person who has NOT ONCE admitted that something he predicted would come true, FAILED to come true, which

is virtually all if the time.

The word "ACCOUNTABILITY" is NONEXISTENT with him and his "Q"UACKAnons, and this is one reason of many why only the dumbest/naive of the

dumbest/naive would give him and his group ANY credibility at all.

Finally in one of his comments in the Political Forum he is claiming that he is NOT a member of the "Q"Anon group.

That is another lie because virtually everything he posts over here comes out of their playbook,

Hmm-He has also posted articles over here in this thread explaining what the group is all about as well as defending them.

The only possible conclusion I can derive is that he is trying to distance himself from them because he realizes that have

been exposed by me and others to be, the liars, frauds, charlatans and FAILED Group that they are!

 

[savage1]

The only worth noting from other thread is that there is eome vague reference to Tom Hanks "belonging to the Navy now," but no direct answer to the question

I posed to sbd in 3811 and in other threads last week to explain the interview between Hanks and Lester Holt in Hanks's home if he was allegedly

residing at GITMO.

 

[savage1]

Nothing of interest at other Forum today, which imo is going to have any impact on the Election.

Perhaps later there will be something of "interest" if for example the author posts something "new," such as the prediction that Trump is going

to win the Election "in the biggest landslide ever." lol

Back later there if there is something posted in the IVU Thread which isn't soporific, the latter which defines most of what is posted over there, and worse

has been proven to be unsupported gossip with little or no substrance.

 

[savage1]

Since the QUACKAnon re: loves to accuse lots of democrats of pedophilia, perhaps he ought to talk about one of their own, namely Donny Trump. lol

https://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2018/12/10-reasons-to-think-trump-is-pedophile.html

 

[savage1]

Just to let you folks who don't already what sbd is about I issued him this challenge today in post 6 in "The Real Reason

Trump Hates Dr. Fauci" Thread.

Being the liar, bs con artist, he did not give me a legitimate reason why he wouldn't accept the bet, and I addressed the one weak he did.

Thus I ask you folks reading the thread to consider this bet and his refusal so far (he has until midnight tonight to accept)inasmuch he is not

only predicting that Trump will win but "in the biggest landslide in history."

I would think that this would be free money for him as Trump simply needs to win by any margin and not the absurd one he says.

Here is what I posted.

I will let you know the results after 12:00 AM this evening, which is the deadline.



"Tell you what, sbd-I made you a bet about the Election and who would win a while back which didn't involve money

but rather a lifetime ban for me if Trump won inthe Election "in the biggest landslide ever" and a puny

one month ban for you if Biden just won-a one month ban, which you refused to

accept or even respond to.

I am going to call your bluff one more time with one which involves just a little bit of money. and which doesn't involve the money being

held in escrow-just a bet between us in good faith as seen by all in this thread.

If you are worried about being paid if you win and the same goes for for me, then I will notify the moderators that if whoever loses doesn't

pay up, that that person be banned and be reinstated until he does.

I know that I am a man of my word but not sure you are-that is why I am keeping the bet small.

Anyways my proposed bet is that if Biden or the democrats win if for some reason Biden is not the candidate as evidenced by the final voting results

and/or when he is inaugurated, you pay $100.

If Trump wins by any margin, then I will pay you $150, which is around the current betting line.

This wager is in effect until 12:00 AM tomorrow morning on July 15.

Will you accept the bet and if not, why not?"

 

[savage1]

Nothing in the IVU Thread which we haven't seen before, and more importantly nothing which is going to affect the Election one way or the other.

For me the only significant thing is my previous post and proposed bet to sbd, which he rejected in other thread with sone flimsy reason that

he might not get paid even though I gave assurance that he would with a proposed way to do it, to which he did not respond.

I mean think of it.

This guy says Trump is going to win the Election "in the biggest landslide in history," and yet won't put up $100 against my $150 just for Trump to win

by any margin let along by his absurd statement.

I even said that I would make the bet even less than $100 and still he wouldn't accept.

My conclusions:

1) No matter what he says, he realizes that if bets me, he is most likely going to lose.

2) Along the same lines as #1, he realizes that if Trump loses and he has to pay me, that it will be a public admission that he was actually wrong

about something;this would be "shocking" because as we all know, every one of his million conspiracy accusation posts and predictions have been "proven to

be true"(lol), and he wouldn't want to admit that "for the first time" he had actually made which did not.

3) He realizes that if he did bet and lost, it wouldn''t be just a lost bet, but it would be hammered home by yours truly how absurd and out of touch with

reality his prediction was that Trump would not only win but "in the biggest landslide in history," which in effect prove to everyone who doesn't already

know that in general he can and has "talk the talk" but cannot/has not "walk the walk" as we have seen since I started exposing him when he opened his thread.

on March 18.

 

[savage1]

Re: posts 233 and 234 in other thread,, I wish I had just $1 for everyone of these FAILED predictions since the "Q"UACKAnon agent started

his thread on March 18.

If you go back further to 2017 when the "Q"UACKAnons themselves began, I would have a nice deposit for my next family vacation!

 

[festeringZit]

savage1 is now the biggest troll in this whole forum-land
fucking retard as well