That`s his game......3 point specialist.
#1 seeded Hawks can`t beat the Cavs with no Irving or Love......At home no less....LMAO
Some of y'all get way too emotional with this stuff. Either that or you just really overthink it to find a narrative that fits what you want to believe.
Dude carries subpar Cavs teams, loses. His fault
Gets better teammates, wins. Well, he needed better teammates.
Yeah it isn't boxing, you kinda do need to play with guys not named Sasha Pavlovic and Delonte West to have success.
Dude carries subpar Cavs teams, loses. His fault
Gets better teammates, wins. Well, he needed better teammates.
Yeah it isn't boxing, you kinda do need to play with guys not named Sasha Pavlovic and Delonte West to have success.
I said earlier in this thread they should just finally go to realignment and seed it 1/16. I used to think that would be stupid because conference imbalance was more just variance and changing the entire system would be an overreaction. We just have a huge sample of the West being superior to the East now though, basically going back 25 years.
I doubt they do anything about it though. It's much easier for TV to have it this way. East coast starts, West coast starts, no overlap, etc...
Warriors would be -400 against the Cavs.
You missed the point entirely, he seemed to be saying, if you lose a lot of finals, you're not so great, but a lot depends on who you are playing(what, is losing to the Spurs, or even an at-his-peak Nowitski chopped liver?)and who you are playing WITH-which is why I mentioned it's not like an individual sport. His point is asinine, whcih more than a couple of people have pointed out.
Name another guy who makes the catch Tyree did against the Perfect Patriots, name another guy besides Cruz who lets an eminently catchable fly ball go over his head with the Rangers one out from winning the World Series, name another supposedly brilliant coach who calls a pass play from the 2 yard line with 20 seconds, three downs, and a time out left with the Super Bowl on the line, name another top MVP candidate who has played a fantastic game who has about 3 brain farts in 5 seconds vs the Warriors with the game on the line, shit happens, and "if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle" stuff is pointless.
tired of people hanging onto the past
sports evolve and players, skill, and talent get better, not worse.
my god, get over yourselves.
MJ was the most dominant of his generation in the 90s without a doubt
shaq was probably the next most dominant, albeit briefly, nobody has had 3 straight rings + 3 finals mvps since him.
then tim duncan
now it's lebron's time.
sports evolve and players, skill, and talent get better, not worse.
my god, get over yourselves.
MJ was the most dominant of his generation in the 90s without a doubt
shaq was probably the next most dominant, albeit briefly, nobody has had 3 straight rings + 3 finals mvps since him.
then tim duncan
now it's lebron's time.
Originally Posted by pocketrocketsNBA was a much harder and better league on Jordan's era, winning a championship back then was harder in any division... Today's league is one of the worst times in league history quality wise yet the product survives cause the brand is already too huge to fall and raising demographics just like gravity pull everything up or down.
2ND that a million times over
lolol
90s basketball is the definition of a diluted league.
"I think sports in general, no matter what city it is, something that's going through a city that's very dramatic, traumatizing or anything of that case, I think sports is one of the biggest healers in helping a city out," James said. :think2:
