Mr. Lombardo soon
issued a statement calling Mr. Trump a “great president.” The crisis was averted. The next week, when Mr. Trump held a Nevada rally, Mr. Lombardo joined the chorus singing his praises onstage.
“The greatest president, right?” Mr. Lombardo said. “Donald J. Trump!” On Friday night, the race was called for Mr. Lombardo.
From start to finish, Mr. Trump was a recurring distraction for party leaders trying to engineer a congressional takeover. He turned the acceptance of his lie about the 2020 election into a litmus test and prized displays of loyalty over political skill, viewing the midterms mostly through the prism of what would help him. The scramble among senior Republicans to harness Mr. Trump as a force for good and not for chaos continued through the hours before Election Day, to head off a pre-election announcement of a 2024 presidential run.
Complicating matters in the Senate was the fact that Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, and Mr. Trump are not on speaking terms. After several first-time, Trump-backed candidates won primaries, Mr. McConnell complained over the summer about his party’s
“candidate quality.”
Among his targets was Arizona’s Blake Masters.
During the summer, Steven Law, the head of a McConnell-aligned super PAC, told the financier Peter Thiel, who had spent millions supporting Mr. Masters, that Mr. Masters had scored the worst focus group results of any candidate he had ever seen, according to people familiar with the conversation.
Mr. Law’s group later canceled all of its Arizona television reservations. On Friday evening, Mr. Masters lost as the race was called for his Democratic opponent, Senator Mark Kelly.
The super PAC’s budget had been sapped by the need to prop up another Trump-backed candidate, J.D. Vance, who emerged from the Ohio primary bruised and broke.
“It just didn’t look like Vance was going to have the critical mass of resources to play a major factor in his own race,” said Mr. Law, whose super PAC redirected $32 million to Ohio. Mr. Vance won.
Mr. McCarthy took a different tack with Mr. Trump, flying to Florida weeks after a Trump-inspired mob had violently stormed the Capitol. “People can judge whatever they want,” Mr. McCarthy said in the interview. “I’m trying to keep people together, and I’m trying to win a majority.”
The alliance has put Mr. McCarthy on the precipice of the speakership even as it limited his party’s appeal, trapping Republicans between a base still loyal to the former president and independent voters who rejected him in two consecutive elections.
Mr. McCarthy said the relationship had still proved critical. “If you look at the difference between our candidates and the Senate, why do we have better candidates?” he said. “I work with the president.”
How Democrats Embraced ‘MAGA’
For years, Mr. Biden has been fond of saying that “this is not your father’s Republican Party” to highlight the G.O.P.’s rightward drift. But the consensus-seeking former senator was loath to paint with too broad a brush.
Informal conversations with historians helped change his mind.
The historians explained to Mr. Biden the power of labels and how they had been used in the past to successfully confront far-right factions, helping him gain comfort in publicly tagging Republican extremism as “MAGA Republicans,” according to a White House official who discussed the issue with him.
A study by Biden alliesidentified “MAGA” as the most effective label — a phrase connoting “extreme,” “power-hungry” and “radical” for some voters.
The president’s
initial rollout of “ultra-MAGA” — in a speech about the economy — was met with derision, even from some Democrats. Mr. Trump co-opted the phrase to sell pint glasses. “I’m the MAGA king,” Mr. Trump declared just before the election.
But Mr. Biden and the Democrats stuck with it, pressing voters to render a verdict on something other than Democrats’ handling of the economy. The October assault on Ms. Pelosi’s husband punctuated the high price of extremism, and Mr. Biden delivered an address on the threats to democracy to keep it at the fore.
Anita Dunn, a senior White House adviser, credited Mr. Biden for setting up the stakes as a choice — “between election deniers and protecting democracy,” she said, and “between a party that threatened a national ban on reproductive health and a party that promised to codify Roe v. Wade into law.”
Voters have repeatedly punished the president’s party for their unhappiness with the state of the nation. Tuesday’s results represented a stark break from that pattern.
Democrats actually won voters who “somewhat disapproved” of Mr. Biden, according to initial exit polling, by a margin of 49 percent to 45 percent. That is a far cry from the 2010 and 2018 midterms, when voters who somewhat disapproved of Barack Obama and Mr. Trump overwhelmingly backed the opposing party — by margins of 40 points and nearly 30 points.
“The voters got the final say, as they always do,” Ms. Dunn said, “when they proved the pundits and ‘Democratic strategists’ wrong once again.”
‘I’ve Never Seen That Before’
In the Senate, the two top Republicans charged with winning the majority — Mr. McConnell and Senator Rick Scott, chairman of the Senate Republican campaign arm — seemed at times to be battling each other as much as the Democrats.
Mr. Scott had pledged a hands-off approach to primaries; Mr. McConnell preferred interventions. Mr. McConnell wanted 2022 to be exclusively a referendum on Mr. Biden; Mr. Scott put out his own agenda, which included putting Social Security on the chopping block, a position the White House used to hammer Republicans.
Nowhere was the dysfunctional relationship more apparent than in New Hampshire.
There, Mr. McConnell’s aligned super PAC had spent millions to stop Don Bolduc, a right-wing candidate, from winning the primary. He won anyway and was quickly embraced by both Mr. Scott and the super PAC.
Then, on Oct. 7,
Mr. Scott’s cash-strapped Senate committeeabruptly pulled all its remaining money from New Hampshire. Mr. Law, the super PAC strategist, was confounded by the party’s decision.
“Evacuated — without explanation,” Mr. Law said. “I’ve never seen that before, absent a scandal.”
The party said other groups were filling the breach, including Mr. Law’s super PAC. But two weeks later, Mr. Law canceled his remaining ads. Suddenly, it was the party that was confounded — and sure enough, the party committee reversed itself to go back on the air days later.
Mr. Law could only laugh. “I don’t know what to make of it,” he said.
The back-and-forth crystallized an almost comical set of misfires and wasted resources — and the larger problem in which Senate Republicans were so often at cross-purposes.
On Tuesday, Senator Maggie Hassan, the Democrat, comfortably defeated Mr. Bolduc.
Changing Face of the G.O.P.
Mr. McCarthy vividly remembers the first State of the Union he attended as Republican leader back in 2019. He looked around the House chamber and felt as though there was something gravely wrong on his side of the aisle.
The Republicans were overwhelmingly old, white and male. “To be frank with you, I watched the Democrats stand up, and they looked like America,” said Mr. McCarthy, who is white. “And we looked like the most restrictive country club in America.”
“That had to change — or I was going to be the leader of a declining party,” Mr. McCarthy said.
In 2020, Republicans had already narrowed Ms. Pelosi’s majority, picking up 14 seats. Every new Republican member who flipped a seat that year was either a woman, a person of color or a veteran. Mr. McCarthy saw a blueprint for a 2022 red wave.
From the moment of Mr. Biden’s victory in 2020, the tailwind of history was behind House Republicans. In the last 90 years, the party that holds the White House has lost an average of 28 seats in the House in a midterm election. And this year, Republicans needed just five to flip the chamber.
Mr. McCarthy aggressively recruited candidates across the country, building
a slate of 67 nonwhite candidates this fall. In some cases, Mr. McCarthy would patch in Donald Trump Jr. on recruiting calls. Mr. McCarthy’s allied super PAC would fund favored candidates.
The first Republican to defeat a Democratic incumbent on Tuesday, Jennifer Kiggans, a former Navy pilot, cleared her primary with nearly $600,000 in super PAC support. In Arizona, the same super PAC spent $1 million helping Juan Ciscomani. Mr. Ciscomani had been a top aide to one of Mr. Trump’s Republican enemies, Gov. Doug Ducey, and the McCarthy team fiercely lobbied to keep Mr. Trump out of the race.
Mr. Trump stayed out of the race of only one House Republican who had voted to impeach him: Representative David Valadao of California, a McCarthy ally in a heavily Democratic swing seat.
Mr. Ciscomani and Mr. Valadao both lead in races that are too close to call.
In Michigan, the McCarthy operation wooed John James, a Black veteran, to run for a seat in a newly drawn district,
releasing a pollthat showed him beating the region’s two Democratic incumbents. The Democrats ran against each other in a neighboring district rather than face Mr. James.
Mr. James’s narrow win on Tuesday accounted for one of the party’s precious few flips.
Mr. James was in Mr. McCarthy’s office the day of the 2019 State of the Union. “He told me that he was self-conscious about the makeup of the conference,” Mr. James recalled. “I never forgot that conversation.”
The Abortion and Money Factor
The first reverberations of the biggest political earthquake of the cycle were felt online. The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, upending a half-century of federally guaranteed abortion rights. Almost immediately, money came pouring into ActBlue, the Democratic online donation site.
An analysis of federal records showed that since the fall of Roe, Democrats had raised $627.7 million through ActBlue — more than two and a half times the $239.3 million Republican haul on WinRed, the G.O.P. donation portal — expanding an existing money edge.
The cash disparity served as an early warning sign for Republican enthusiasm. In contrast to other midterms, the party in power was the one most energized by what was being taken away from it. From coast to coast, Democratic campaigns
ran abortion ads over the summer, casting Republicans as extremists and then winning some key races, including
an abortion-related referendum in Kansas and
a special House election in New York.
In late August, the Republican National Committee gathered its biggest donors for an emergency call. Money and morale were down. Democratic poll numbers were up. “It was a moment we had to calm everybody down,” Ms. McDaniel, the party chairwoman, said in an interview. “We were stopping the panic.”
The Republican financial cavalry soon arrived.
The leading House and Senate G.O.P. super PACs combined to spend more than $400 million after Sept 1. The McCarthy-aligned super PAC had a financial edge of nearly $90 million over its Democratic counterpart, almost entirely because 10 conservative families gave a combined total of more than $100 million.
Republicans used their financial might to stretch the House map
deep into Democratic territory, though most of those races —
outside New York — ended in losses. A House Republican strategist said private polling had showed their candidates surging late. They presumed a backlash to inflation, other economic issues and the president would push them over the finish line. It did not.
Among those targeted in the final blitz was the man overseeing the Democratic campaign operation: Mr. Maloney.
Mr. Maloney had spent months goading Republicans to come after him. Then, after the super PAC announced plans to spend an additional $4 million, he joked to aides that he suddenly felt like the “Jurassic Park” character who taunted the T. rex to draw it away from the children, only to find himself running for his own life.
In the days since his loss, Mr. Maloney has told people he hoped the national G.O.P. money spent against him might have, at the least, saved a few of his colleagues
komonews.com
