It's our fault just as much. We keep trying to reason with him. No one is telling him Seymour's remarks are not offensive. We get that. But you offer this kid another way to handle his emotions, and his response is always to put an offensive label upon anyone who reaches out to him and add another comment meant to incite. Then he completes the circle trying to tell everyone how relaxed and contented he is.
What conclusions are we to draw?
"He is SCUM. I don't associate with SCUM."
And lastly, why should I give a Fuck whether or not Seymour hates Blacks? Or Jews? That's about him, not me. Doesn't effect my life. Means a lot to SCUM though.
It's happened plenty of times. I ran them all off.
The only time I ever came close to "crazy" in a forum (par for the course with you daily) was in Major Wager at a poster named Fenway who spammed the entire forum with 9/11 conspiracy BS.
What tiny country has more people helping earthquake victims in Nepal than every other country combined?
Who can say anything bad about Jews? As if any group of people has contributed more to the betterment of mankind
It's happened plenty of times. I ran them all off.
The only time I ever came close to "crazy" in a forum (par for the course with you daily) was in Major Wager at a poster named Fenway who spammed the entire forum with 9/11 conspiracy BS.
What tiny country has more people helping earthquake victims in Nepal than every other country combined?
Who can say anything bad about Jews? As if any group of people has contributed more to the betterment of mankind
Well, might as well put me on ignore... I'm not going to stop calling out people talking about raping N$ggers kids. If that effects you so bad, there's nothing I can do about it. Sorry for hurting your racist friends feelings. Keep up the support, you're doing a great job!
"It's our fault just as much. We keep trying to reason with him. No one is telling him Seymour's remarks are not offensive. We get that. But you offer this kid another way to handle his emotions, and his response is always to put an offensive label upon anyone who reaches out to him and add another comment meant to incite. Then he completes the circle trying to tell everyone how relaxed and contented he is."
Actually yes I do. People who support others talking about raping N$ggers kids is not gonna be my friend. But you're also the clown that said it's not racist to say "for every one black there are 10 that will cut you and steal your wallet." So you're clearly not all there mentally. But you fit right in at TheRX.
The funniest part, is this is a perfect example of the difference between the left and the right. I don't think a single person here that is blaming me for calling people racists votes Democrat. Tons of people that find comments like we should rape the N$ggers kids as less important than someone calling people who say those comments racists.
Shocking to see how disgraceful Republicans are as people. Just reiterates why so many people think of them as racists... because, well... they are. Let me know when decent people start calling me out, then I'll go back to the drawing board on my position against racism.
Shocking to see how disgraceful Republicans are as people. Just reiterates why so many people think of them as racists... because, well... they are. Let me know when decent people start calling me out, then I'll go back to the drawing board on my position against racism.
[ The Democrat Party is *the* racist party, historically and now... documented FACT ]
Wrong on Race uncovers a hidden past that many Democrats would rather see swept under the carpet. Ranging from the founding of the Republic through to today, it rectifies the unfair perceptions of America's two national parties. While Nixon's infamous "Southern Strategy" is constantly referenced in the media, less well remembered are Woodrow Wilson's segregation of the entire Federal civil service; FDR's appointment of a member of the KKK to the Supreme Court; John F. Kennedy's apathy towards civil rights legislation; and the ascension of Robert Byrd, who is current President pro tempore of the Senate, third in line in the presidential line of succession, and a former member of the KKK.
Bartlett's chronicle of the Democratic Party's sordid past…offer illuminating evidence that, despite great marks of progress, race's stranglehold on the nation's collective conscious remains as strong as ever. (Washington Post Book World)
Bruce Bartlett brandishes a damning history of the Democratic Party, which for 100 years after the Civil War provided a fertile ground for Jim Crow and white supremacy. Democrats have long acted behind an ethos of racial equality, yet, as Bartlett powerfully illustrates, the reality of their patchy record over the last two centuries in fact lends little credibility to that claim. Compelling and incisive. (Grover G. Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform)
Wrong on Race is an important contribution to the study of party politics in America. Bartlett offers a thorough, well documented account of the racial roots of the Democratic party. This book should be a required reading for African-Americans of all ages, and especially for the nation's youth. (Carol Swain, Professor of Political Science and Law, Vanderbilt University, and editor of Debating Immigration)
Wrong on Race powerfully recapitulates a twentieth century journey into racial pettifogging and outright confusion, and in doing so shines a light as clear as the meridian sun on the realities of racial politics…Bruce Bartlett has done what no one before him has done, and it is all the more remarkable, therefore, to say that it will probably never be better done. (Professor William B. Allen, Michigan State University; and former chairman, U.S. Civil Rights Commission)
The Democratic party is widely credited, not least by black writers, as the party that has done the most for civil rights. Yet for most of its history it has been the other way around. As Bruce Bartlett points out in Wrong on Race, Democratic icons like Woodrow Wilson worked to impose segregation on blacks, and even Franklin Roosevelt did little for equal rights. (Michael Barone, syndicated columnist, co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, and author of Our First Revolution)
Wrong on Race uncovers a hidden past that many Democrats would rather see swept under the carpet. Ranging from the founding of the Republic through to today, it rectifies the unfair perceptions of America's two national parties. While Nixon's infamous "Southern Strategy" is constantly referenced in the media, less well remembered are Woodrow Wilson's segregation of the entire Federal civil service; FDR's appointment of a member of the KKK to the Supreme Court; John F. Kennedy's apathy towards civil rights legislation; and the ascension of Robert Byrd, who is current President pro tempore of the Senate, third in line in the presidential line of succession, and a former member of the KKK.
Bartlett's chronicle of the Democratic Party's sordid past…offer
Bruce Bartlett brandishes a damning history of the Democratic Party, which for 100 years after the Civil War provided a fertile ground for Jim Crow and white supremacy. Democrats have long acted behind an ethos of racial equality, yet, as Bartlett powerfully illustrates, the reality of their patchy record over the last two centuries in fact lends little credibility to that claim. Compelling and incisive. (Grover G. Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform)
Wrong on Race is an important contribution to the study of party politics in America. Bartlett offers a thorough, well documented account of the racial roots of the Democratic party. This book should be a required reading for African-Americans of all ages, and especially for the nation's youth. (Carol Swain, Professor of Political Science and Law, Vanderbilt University, and editor of Debating Immigration)
Wrong on Race powerfully recapitulates a twentieth century journey into racial pettifogging and outright confusion, and in doing so shines a light as clear as the meridian sun on the realities of racial politics…Bruce Bartlett has done what no one before him has done, and it is all the more remarkable, therefore, to say that it will probably never be better done. (Professor William B. Allen, Michigan State University; and former chairman, U.S. Civil Rights Commission)
The Democratic party is widely credited, not least by black writers, as the party that has done the most for civil rights. Yet for most of its history it has been the other way around. As Bruce Bartlett points out in Wrong on Race, Democratic icons like Woodrow Wilson worked to impose segregation on blacks, and even Franklin Roosevelt did little for equal rights. (Michael Barone, syndicated columnist, co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, and author of Our First Revolution)
