Week 9: Sunday Openers

Search

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
TIL they don't kick the extra point if there is no time left and it doesn't help make a tie/win. Almost had a backdoor push on Navy, damn.
All Navy needed was one 2 point conversion..Aaargh.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
2* Temple -7 The UC Bearcats have a chance here because of Gunner Kiel, Mr. Enigma. Kiel was once thought of as a top NFL prospect, but now through injuries, personal issues, and being a head case, started the year as the 3rd stringer. It seems that HC Tuberville was desperate for some scoring, and Kiel had a good week of practice, so he thought,"What the hell." Kiel came through vs. ECU, passing for 300+ yards and stopping a skid where they lost 3 out of 4, only beating Miami OH by 7 points at home. I think this is a buy high opportunity for Temple bettors. And though Temple is coming off a huge stomping of USF, they really have played well for a number of reasons.

Temple is a very physical team on both sides of the ball, and should be riding a 5 game winning streak. Their loss at Memphis was due to a couple of turnovers and a Memphis KO return. But if you saw the game, it was clear that Temple was the better team. Temple's D has come a long way from their opening loss to Army. They swarm to the ball well, and collapse the pocket. Memphis and USF QBs seemed to have little time to pass. I think this matches up well with Kiel, who is a pocket passer who is fairly brittle. UC also doesn't run the ball very well so Temple can anticipate Kiel in the pocket for many plays. If they don't get to him, this 2* goes down in flames, but if they do, Temple's OL and running game will dominate. Generally, I play teams like Temple that play D well, run the ball well, and have enough of a pass game to keep their opponents honest. Walker, the Temple QB, is a senior and has had 3-4 games this year where he has passed well, and then a couple of stinkers. Temple has played the slightly tougher schedule. UC has played Miami OH, UT Martin, Purdue(a game Purdue threw away), UConn(losing by 11) and got beat badly by USF and Houston. UC has always hung on their pass-happy multiple receiver offense, but this year they start a whole new group of WRs with mixed results.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
2* Wyoming +15 Been on almost Boise game this year, for or against. Have only lost one. Brian Hill will be the best RB out there tomorrow, not Jeremy McNichols. Wyoming's Hill is not only a power back, but has great shifty moves and can turn the corner with a burst of speed. Has already run for over 1,000 yards in just 7 games. I don't think Boise has faced anyone like him this year, and Boise is a little thinner on defense this week. They lose their STUD Gabe Perez, STUD meaning "stand up DL/LB". Perez is good. I also like that Wyoming has a dual threat QB who is inconsistent as a passer, but much better than what they have had going back to last year. Wyoming's OL is physical and I think that makes their running game extend drives, eating up clock, and helping a home underdog getting 15 points.

Now Boise has the advantage of having an excellent passing game, and Rypien is playing well. Wyoming will give up some big plays there. But Boise has had too many penalties this year, turnovers and special teams screw ups that have helped their underdog opponents cover. Their kicker isn't all that good. Biggest game in Laramie in a long while, and they are expecting a great crowd. Hill and the Cowboys will play off that emotion,hopefully, and make this a game. Maybe an upset win. Wyoming is 5-2, with a 3 point loss on the road to an improved EMU team, and a road loss to Nebraska that got out of control in the 4th quarter due to turnovers.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Thank you to the above posters. I hope the write-ups help you decide on a game or two.

Last two(probably). I follow the Oregon teams more than any others, although not a fan of either. Had to play these with all the info circulating in my head.

1* ASU +8.5 This many points to ASU playing a lousy Duck team is mostly due to ASU playing their 3rd or 4th string QB. I get that. But I think it's an overreaction. Justin Herbert is still very inexperienced and it's too soon to say how he'll be even long term. Cal's D is so pathetic that last week that your grandmother could score 14 off of them. Before that he was tested by UDub, and didn't do too bad considering they lost by 49. But ASU will be the first team that blitzes often, and will even bring pressure with the front 4. The Ducks OL is still a work in progress, and one of the weakest here in the past 5-7 years. Still Herbert will have some success. ASU is pretty good at QB pressure, sacks, and stopping the run, but if you get time to pass- their secondary is pretty bad. I also think ASU's run heavy offense will do pretty well. The Duck D and DC Hoke were extremely crushed by last week's lost @Cal. They don't defend the run or pass well. Look for a 300+ rushing day perhaps from ASU.

1* Wazzu -14 Was so close to grabbing the 13 last night but didn't know the status of Luke Falk. He's going to play, and even though he's banged up, well….he's always banged up and plays pretty good that way. This is a buy high on Oregon State opportunity. They have covered vs. Utah, UW and beat Cal. But all those games have a caveat. Cal: Davis Webb hurt his thumb in the 1st half and couldn't grip the ball, and man did it make a difference. Beavers won in OT vs. QB with no usable thumb and a terrible D. UW: The Huskies dominated to 31-0 by half, and then Chris Petersen pulled the starters 3Q early and just ran up the middle for a quarter and a half. The Beavers got a mercy cover here. Utah: In a monsoon and wind storm. Utah looked like the much better team, but the conditions made this a difficult game to do anything offensively. I really like this game and might make it a 2* because WSU has a running game and a good defense this year. Probably 3rd best in the PAC 12. These are 2 aspects they NEVER had in past years. As for the Beavs, I don't like their latest QB, Marcus Mcmaryion. He is too hard on himself, emotionless, and he was 3rd string on a team that has all crummy QBs. Garrettson, the starter, couldn't start in about 95% of the FBS teams in the country. The Beavs are also suffering from a lot of injuries and anymore this game will make them especially thin.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
3* WVU/ Oklahoma St.- under 65 Going back to last year, when West Virginia also had a good defense, they kept the scores of their Big 12 games down to reasonable levels. Also, you have to have mucho respect for holding TCU to 10 and Texas Tech to 17. Seems like they are even a much better D than the beginning of this year. TT Coach Kingsbury said they defended the spread really well, not giving up yardage after short passes, tackling well, playing downhill and with a 3-3-5, made it difficult to know what gaps to block. TCU Coach Gary Patterson also praised the WV D by saying they played together, played smart and were very physical. DC Tony Gibson lost a few really talented players to the NFL, but this year's group is mostly juniors and seniors- showing the depth WVU had in defensive recruiting. WVU's pass defense is only giving up a 52% completion rate, and only 5 rushing TDs.

Now I think this total is at 65 because: #1 Oklahoma State is not very good defensively. But, here they are playing at home vs. an undefeated team, and OSU vying for at least a decent bowl game. You'll see a good solid effort. Also, WVU is a run heavy offense, partly because they have a defense that can keep their opponents in check, partly because the OL is better at run blocking than pass blocking. As for Oklahoma State on offense, well…they haven't played one good D yet this year, unless you count Baylor. And against Baylor they ran more than usual, and passed short down the field. I can see a total more in the mid-40s to mid-50s here.
This game was looking great until Skylar Howard's fumble. Dude..that was you last year…I thought you were over that.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
1* WSU -7 1H (-120) ​Washington State should be able to cover 7 in 1H. See write-up above.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Michigan State 44 yards passing and still within the number. I doubt they cover though. Knowing Harbaugh, he'll want that next score. Michigan pass rush is fierce..Spoke too soon. MSU scores!
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Good day, but the late games could put a chink in the winnings. Cougs look so flat.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Clemson gets the push. Considering where this game was going momentum-wise, I'll take it.
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,190
Tokens
Finally a breakthrough week: 9-5, +13.95 units

7-0 on the first 7 posted games.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
13,470
Tokens
Nice work Fred.......Nobody ever said sports handicapping is easy......You seem to take a few "snarls" out of the process.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,931
Messages
13,575,386
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com