United States Confirms: 2014 was Hottest Year on Record - And AK Confirms Conservatives are Retarded

[Acebb]

Note this:

Most drastic changes to weather resulted in mass extinctions of species and significant destruction of the environment.


Is definitely not this:

Primary causes of mass extinctions are linked in various ways to the carbon cycle in general and ocean chemistry in particular with clear association with atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. The prospect of ocean acidification is potentially the most serious of all predicted outcomes of anthropogenic carbon dioxide increase. This study concludes that acidification has the potential to trigger a sixth mass extinction event and to do so independently of anthropogenic extinctions that are currently taking place.

azzkick(&^

And he is too fucking dumb to know why.

 

[akphidelt]

Most drastic changes to weather resulted in mass extinctions of species and significant destruction of the environment.


ointer:

That is true, although I should change weather to "climate". Regardless, not sure what's funny about it. Our increases in CO2 levels are unprecedented throughout our known history. The periods of time which it did increase significantly (at rates less than what we are increasing currently), were periods associated with mass extinction events.

 

[Acebb]

That is true, although I should change weather to "climate". Regardless, not sure what's funny about it. Our increases in CO2 levels are unprecedented throughout our known history. The periods of time which it did increase, were periods associated with mass extinction events.

It isn't true at all. It is silly, stupid bullshit and you're a comical dumb fuck.

 

[Acebb]

The periods of time which it did increase, were periods associated with mass extinction events.

The periods of time it increased rapidly where mass extinctions occurred were due to asteroids slamming into earth and massive volcanic eruptions.

You left that part out, you dumb pile of shit.

 

[Acebb]

And again, you have to love watching this dipshit pretend 1 paper = scientific fact.

He doesn't even realize what a scientific illiterate he is.

 

[akphidelt]

It isn't true at all. It is silly, stupid bullshit and you're a comical dumb fuck.

Well according to actual scientists who research this stuff, it is true. I understand the voices in your head tell you, you are smarter than real scientists, but trust me... you are not.

Atmospheric CO2 levels
in parts per million (ppm) over
the time of the existence of
reefs. The vertical bars are the
intervals of reef gaps following
the five great mass extinction
events. Broken lines indicate
doubtful reconstructions. All
reef gaps, with the exception of
the Late Devonian, are probably
associated with rapidly
increasing or high CO2 levels
(after Veron 2008)

http://iod.ucsd.edu/courses/sio278/documents/veron_08_coral_reefs.pdf

 

[akphidelt]

And again, you have to love watching this dipshit pretend 1 paper = scientific fact.

He doesn't even realize what a scientific illiterate he is.

It doesn't, but your refutation of the paper is not fact either. I will take the word of actual scientists over you any day, not going to lie, lol. You are really dumb and shouldn't be making any comments about science, math, finance, etc. You should stick to birther arguments and Hillary approval ratings. I'm above your pay rate.

 

[akphidelt]

The periods of time it increased rapidly where mass extinctions occurred were due to asteroids slamming into earth and massive volcanic eruptions.

You left that part out, you dumb pile of shit.

Hahahaha, I love how first you didn't know there were mass extinctions, now you are using the evidence I provided you to start talking about why those mass extinctions occurred. But the funniest part is you don't understand that the argument climate scientists are making is that whether it is asteroids, volcanoes, or man pumping billions of tons of Co2 in to the atmosphere, drastic increasing of Co2 is known to be associated with events that caused serious damage to our ecosystem.

You are really really dumb, lol. I just owned you pretty bad, I'd take some time off.

 

[akphidelt]

Nothing to see here, the Earth is old and man can't effect it...

 

[SheriffJoe]

Warmists getting angrier

By Thomas Lifson

As their computer models fail and their predictions of doom fail to materialize, the warmist cult is employing more and more extreme language to denounce those who disagree with their cant. The UK Mail on Sunday provides a vivid example from the experience of its journalist David Rose.

I've never supported the British National Party or the Ku Klux Klan. I've never belonged to the Paedophile Information Exchange, or denied the Holocaust, or made a penny from the banking crash.
​

But if you read The Guardian newspaper's website, you might think otherwise. A commentator on it urged my own children to murder me.

He did so because of one of the many stories I've written for this newspaper about climate change. I first reported on the subject nearly six years ago: my article was about the 'climategate' scandal, where leaked emails showed university scientists were trying to cover up data that suggested their claim the world is hotter than at any time in the past 1,300 years may be wrong.

Ever since then, I have been labelled a 'climate change denier' – a phrase which, since I happen to be Jewish, has particularly unfortunate connotations for me.

And this is despite the fact I believe the world IS warming, and that carbon dioxide produced by mankind IS a greenhouse gas, and IS partly responsible for higher temperatures – and have repeatedly said so.

On the other hand, I also think that the imminence of the threat posed by global warming has been exaggerated – chiefly because the grimmer computer projections haven't been reflected by what's been happening recently to temperatures in the real world.

​

One of the characteristics of cults is that their greatest fury is reserved for dissidents within, the moderates who generally agree, but who deviate from the official line. They are the greatest threat because they appeal to fellow cultists.

Rose offers a worthwhile chronicle of tosme of the other extreme language being employed by the cult. For example:

Language only barely less extreme is now common. In the US, the Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has written that anyone who denies global warming must be 'punished in the afterlife… this kind of denial is an almost inconceivable sin'.​ :missingte

Observer columnist Nick Cohen says he is sick of hearing climate sceptics whinge that being called 'deniers' equates them with those who deny the Holocaust: 'The evidence for man-made global warming is as final as the evidence of Auschwitz. No other word will do.'
​

Mr. Cohen is not to be trusted on any subject if he thinks this way. Historic fact is not the same thing as computer models, and that is all that the warmists have, along with a track record of fantasy predictions that have not come true.

This is a remarkable and dangerous age, one in which violent rhetoric is employed by people entrenched in various powerful establishments. Worrisome does not begin to describe it.

Read the whole thing. As usual with the Daily Mail, there are great pictures.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/02/warmists_getting_angrier.html#ixzz3QVbijv5b
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 

[SheriffJoe]

Paul Krugman has written that anyone who denies global warming must be 'punished in the afterlife… this kind of denial is an almost inconceivable sin'.​

"Have fun in Hell. Lucifer loves people like you!" - akphi-idiot

Our resident Keynesian climate nutter even copies Krugman's lame-ass petty insults. hno:

Man, it just doesn't get any nuttier and unhinged than leftist climate nutters.

 

[SheriffJoe]

"Historic fact is not the same thing as computer models, and that is all that the warmists have, along with a track record of fantasy predictions that have not come true."

:aktion033

That's all they have - bullshit computer models that never work. Doom-gloom predictions that never come true.

I lived through their "Big Freeze" BS, and now the "warming" BS since the late 1990s with failed prediction after prediction.

Gullible akphi-idiot thinks his fancy graphs represent reality. Really, REALLY smart dudes told him so. Now THAT is very dumb.

Embarrassing.

 

[akphidelt]

Paul Krugman has written that anyone who denies global warming must be 'punished in the afterlife… this kind of denial is an almost inconceivable sin'.​

"Have fun in Hell. Lucifer loves people like you!" - akphi-idiot

Our resident Keynesian climate nutter even copies Krugman's lame-ass petty insults. hno:

Man, it just doesn't get any nuttier and unhinged than leftist climate nutters.

Haha, I said that because you guys are psycho ass racists. I call you retarded for your dumbass global warming beliefs. That is not grounds for after life punishment. Just grounds for a lot of ridicule in your current life. There's many other reasons why Lucifer will accept you with open arms.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Haha, I said that because you guys are psycho ass racists. I call you retarded for your dumbass global warming beliefs. That is not grounds for after life punishment. Just grounds for a lot of ridicule in your current life. There's many other reasons why Lucifer will accept you with open arms.

You think you're ridiculing people. That's how dumb and deeply steeped you are into your cult.

Everyone on the outside is laughing their asses off at you.

akphi-idiot's cult of FAILED DUMB computer models, lol.

He sounds very educated, lol.

A real life psycho, lol.

 

[akphidelt]

"Historic fact is not the same thing as computer models, and that is all that the warmists have, along with a track record of fantasy predictions that have not come true."

:aktion033

That's all they have - bullshit computer models that never work. Doom-gloom predictions that never come true.

I lived through their "Big Freeze" BS, and now the "warming" BS since the late 1990s with failed prediction after prediction.

Gullible akphi-idiot thinks his fancy graphs represent reality. Really, REALLY smart dudes told him so. Now THAT is very dumb.

Embarrassing.

Lmao!! Conservative science at its finest right here!! No wonder you guys are so dumb!

 

[SheriffJoe]

akphi-idiot's 'warmers' = Stu Feiner's ONE MILLION STAR LOCK OF THE CENTURY!

"No snow in Aspen in 80 years!"

Our super duper sophisticated computer models have been adjusted...this time we're right!

:laughingb Loser!@#0

 

[akphidelt]

akphi-idiot's 'warmers' = Stu Feiner's ONE MILLION STAR LOCK OF THE CENTURY!

"No snow in Aspen in 80 years!"

Our super duper sophisticated computer models have been adjusted...this time we're right!

:laughingb Loser!@#0

More conservative science going on here! You guys seem really intelligent. "All dem educate folk and their puter models. Cousin Bill went down to the crick and it was cold. Global warming not real!"

 

[Acebb]

Well according to actual scientists who research this stuff, it is true. I understand the voices in your head tell you, you are smarter than real scientists, but trust me... you are not.

You have to love "are probably associated" meaning "Most drastic changes to weather resulted in mass extinctions of species "

ointer:

What a laughable dumb fuck.

 

[Acebb]

Hahahaha, I love how first you didn't know there were mass extinctions, now you are using the evidence I provided you to start talking about why those mass extinctions occurred. But the funniest part is you don't understand that the argument climate scientists are making is that whether it is asteroids, volcanoes, or man pumping billions of tons of Co2 in to the atmosphere, drastic increasing of Co2 is known to be associated with events that caused serious damage to our ecosystem.

You are really really dumb, lol. I just owned you pretty bad, I'd take some time off.

Um, except there was no point where I didn't know there were mass extinctions and you've been reduced to lying.

You are a laughably stupid pathetic coward typing some of the dumbest shit I've ever read.

 

[Acebb]

But the funniest part is you don't understand that the argument climate scientists are making is that whether it is asteroids, volcanoes, or man pumping billions of tons of Co2 in to the atmosphere, drastic increasing of Co2 is known to be associated with events that caused serious damage to our ecosystem.

Actually, when I brought up the cause of the dramatic increases in CO2 vis-a-vis mass extinctions, you said:

Nice red herring. The reason for "why the CO2 levels" changed was never brought up or needs to be known for this conversation.

Don't worry simpleton, lying is what you do. Because your posts are what happens when a low IQ meets topical ignorance.