"Climate science" is a loose term, seemingly designed to fit a political agenda.
The answer to your question is well over 30,000.
And if you widen the definition to include astrophysicists, atmospheric chemists and glaciologists and the like, you could probably add another 50,000 on top of that.
But hey, congratulations...you found 75 "scientists" (out of 10,000 solicited) leeching off government grants to agree with you.
"smart people think like me" lmfao
Loser!@#0
Yeah sure there is interesting data that I don't expect to alter your opinion but you may find interesting. The link I've attached has the charts. Don't know how to post the charts from my phone.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-16/bad-news-keynesians-data-shows-austerians-are-right
I already read it. It's the common way conservatives/libertarians try to con people. You'll notice the X-Axis is "% of Potential GDP". It's the same situation I had with Acebb who was arguing "Spending as a % of GDP". That has nothing to do with Keynes or Krugman. They want large increases to Government spending, not large increases to % of Potential GDP. That's a con game and it basically shows what common sense would lead you to believe. It's just basic math.
For instance, just to show you guys how foolish these % of graphs are. The diamond mark on the bottom left is Greece. What the deception is, is people are using this to argue against Keynes or Krugman or anyone who understands what they are talking about. Even though the truth is... see below.
Greece has implemented some of the largest austerity measures of all. So the most ironic things about those graphs, is they support my theory more than Austrian theory. That's why Tyler Durden and that clown show of a site is ridiculous. Just nothing but trying to con people. That's why I stick to real sites with real educated people that care about economic theory and not about political ideologies. That correlation is meant to mislead people in to thinking "higher deficits" mean higher government spending. When in reality basic math would prove that assertion is neither right or wrong and is completely dependent on both variables.
Greece has implemented some of the largest austerity measures of all. So the most ironic things about those graphs, is they support my theory more than Austrian theory. That's why Tyler Durden and that clown show of a site is ridiculous. Just nothing but trying to con people. That's why I stick to real sites with real educated people that care about economic theory and not about political ideologies. That correlation is meant to mislead people in to thinking "higher deficits" mean higher government spending. When in reality basic math would prove that assertion is neither right or wrong and is completely dependent on both variables.
