Baseballdave;
Re: this:
What struck me as funny and big time hypocritical is that, while you truly believe your "side of the story" is the correct side (which you post the stats from your side) and you acknowledge that SBD has the right to tell his side (which he posts the stats that he has), you say that if anyone believes in the stats that SBD says, they "live in La la land and are completely out of touch with reality".
First of all, why should I blast you-you have asked legitimate questions rather than attack, which you have done to me at least a few times
in the past in several threads.
.
To the point-first of all keep in mind that it was/is HE/NOT I who made the far out predictions as to what was going to occur on specific dates and also more vague
dates which said "imminent," which means VERY, VERY soon.
Did anyone of these events occur and especially the New Order Stuff?
Do you believe that the majority of folks who see predictions like that see them as distinct possibilities or lets see closer to delusional or based
on fantasy or perhaps just wishful thinking?
I happen to believe that the majority of folks would choose the second option.
Thus, the La la land comment is based on what he has stated would happen by SPECIFIC DATES.
If he hadn't been so arrogant so as to specify dates, then I would not have said what I did.
In fact if you go back and read some posts during the first week or so when the thread started, you will see that I actually
agree with a lot of the New Order stuff and that it will come to pass SOME DAY, but unlike I don't claim to have the
ability to predict when this will occur.
Last I read, the Bible says that only God knows EXACTLY WHEN important events like above will come to pass, and that doesn't include posters on
message boards.
Go back and google, if you don't know already, how Harold Camping did with his prediction of the End of the World or for that matter, Jehovas Witnesses,
who have been predicting the end of the world for 144 years.
Also, to clarify, I am not 100% sure for example that folks like the Clintons are lily pure, but unlike SBD I don't make one post after another
24/7/365 claiming that the folks are innocent as opposed to his claims that the folks he claims are 100% guilty and that they
will be convicted and brought to justice within days-big difference!
Also keep in mind that when I have presented something which counters something he has said, it is ALWAYS dismissed weakly as "fake news without
saying why-just to dismiss it because it comes from of the MSM sources doesn't do it.
My "other side of the story" is simply that, namely to state that which he hasn't revealed in his opinions
so that folks reading this are getting something else to consider.
Imo what he does for whatever reason is "pile on" every day with around 7-8 new posts each day, as if these new posts are going to get someone
to change their minds to his way of thinking.
For me it is overkill, and if anything indicates worry on his part that his message is not getting through because no one is coming forth to agree with him.
And yes you can say the same thing about what I write in response.
The only thing I assure you of is that if he didn't keep posting the same stuff over and over again, the only differences that a few new "culprits'
are mentioned along with some wording of his daily mantra, I wouldn't do what I do in response.
That's about it for now.
Hopefully by now as I suggested last time I spoke to you, you have checked out my closing post 1152 in his thread or will do so for a
fuller understanding from point of view.