ps it is quite obvious to all that for all intents and purposes this discussion/debate is and has been for a while between sbd and me, and I expect it
to remain that way.
The number of or lack of legitimate responses besides the ones which are offered between him and me are a clear indication of that.
In essence all I care about is that people read what I have to say and for that matter what he has to say, whether they respond or not.
In my Phil Steele/NC Thread last season, I averaged about 300 hits a today during football season.
The reason is that I provided documentation of NC's Late Phone record along with a recap and commentary of their comp. line message and how they
presented their record.
If people were not at least interested in what I had to say, then the thread would not have been as successful as it was.
Is is essentially the same thing in this thread.
to remain that way.
The number of or lack of legitimate responses besides the ones which are offered between him and me are a clear indication of that.
In essence all I care about is that people read what I have to say and for that matter what he has to say, whether they respond or not.
In my Phil Steele/NC Thread last season, I averaged about 300 hits a today during football season.
The reason is that I provided documentation of NC's Late Phone record along with a recap and commentary of their comp. line message and how they
presented their record.
If people were not at least interested in what I had to say, then the thread would not have been as successful as it was.
Is is essentially the same thing in this thread.
"I should mention that even a pro-rata basis it's still not even close.
Truth vs. Gibberish
Real evidence vs. Fake news"
The last "poisoning the well" sentence is why this person is a very weak debater.
I clearly spelled out in post 137 what "fake news" is by the author of the thread is at end of this post.
Even if when all is said and done he gets more responses than I do(which I doubt), does he really believe that all of the folks who read it or even the
majority agree with him?
If so then why have in essence the only few people who have come forth, disagreed with him.
I would think that there would be a bit more intelligent and objective people come forth to agree.
Post 137:
New definition of the word "fake/fake news" as it applies to Trump and the author of the Update CV Thread:
A catchall term which applies when someone presents news and/or documentation about something which challenges/rebuts an existing opinion they(Trump, et al)
have and which they cannot refute by their usual modus operandi of lies, half truths, one sided finger pointing and overall deception.
There is also a new definition of the word "ignore" with Trump and the author of the CV Thread, which applies when they would rather
just plain "ignore"/pretend the commentary directed towards them doesn't exist when the documentation is overwhelming, and the words "fake news"
simply won't get it done.
Examples-Trump's documented racism over his life(and which hasn't changed) and his 18000 plus lies told during his tenure,
both of which I have fully documented previously with links.
Truth vs. Gibberish
Real evidence vs. Fake news"
The last "poisoning the well" sentence is why this person is a very weak debater.
I clearly spelled out in post 137 what "fake news" is by the author of the thread is at end of this post.
Even if when all is said and done he gets more responses than I do(which I doubt), does he really believe that all of the folks who read it or even the
majority agree with him?
If so then why have in essence the only few people who have come forth, disagreed with him.
I would think that there would be a bit more intelligent and objective people come forth to agree.
Post 137:
New definition of the word "fake/fake news" as it applies to Trump and the author of the Update CV Thread:
A catchall term which applies when someone presents news and/or documentation about something which challenges/rebuts an existing opinion they(Trump, et al)
have and which they cannot refute by their usual modus operandi of lies, half truths, one sided finger pointing and overall deception.
There is also a new definition of the word "ignore" with Trump and the author of the CV Thread, which applies when they would rather
just plain "ignore"/pretend the commentary directed towards them doesn't exist when the documentation is overwhelming, and the words "fake news"
simply won't get it done.
Examples-Trump's documented racism over his life(and which hasn't changed) and his 18000 plus lies told during his tenure,
both of which I have fully documented previously with links.
ointer:
Perhaps the psychic/WAYNE should take a look not only in this thread but in general in all threads both in this forum and at CM to see how many have actually
come forth to say anything positive about him or his posts as opposed to those who have come forward to express
negative commentary-the latter wins in a landslide.
Why do you think that is?
ps I am not counting the likes of lowlifes like stevieray who like him can only offer only name calling and insults as their form of "agreement."
come forth to say anything positive about him or his posts as opposed to those who have come forward to express
negative commentary-the latter wins in a landslide.
Why do you think that is?
ps I am not counting the likes of lowlifes like stevieray who like him can only offer only name calling and insults as their form of "agreement."
Imo one of the big reasons the author of the Coronavirus Update Thread hasn't got a lot of responses is not so much the political end of it, which
I am sure some folks agree with, but rather because of the wacko extreme predictions he made in the spiritual part of his discussion by certain dates.
I mean were all of the noted democrats brought to "justice' since he started making the predictions on March 18 when the thread was started and/or
were these "evil" folks simply zapped by God for everyone living being on the planet to see?
Did any of these date based/imminent/very/soon "micdrop" things he predicted come to pass as he predicted?
Did the New World Order/One All Loving Society for all people on earth where wars are now non existent and all evils and negativity
just disappear and poof all of a sudden the World is Perfect, come to pass as he said it would???
Do you think "perhaps" just "perhaps" think this kind of stuff just might reflect badly on the person uttering this stuff take away from his overall
credibility???
I am sure some folks agree with, but rather because of the wacko extreme predictions he made in the spiritual part of his discussion by certain dates.
I mean were all of the noted democrats brought to "justice' since he started making the predictions on March 18 when the thread was started and/or
were these "evil" folks simply zapped by God for everyone living being on the planet to see?
Did any of these date based/imminent/very/soon "micdrop" things he predicted come to pass as he predicted?
Did the New World Order/One All Loving Society for all people on earth where wars are now non existent and all evils and negativity
just disappear and poof all of a sudden the World is Perfect, come to pass as he said it would???
Do you think "perhaps" just "perhaps" think this kind of stuff just might reflect badly on the person uttering this stuff take away from his overall
credibility???
