Forty other threads where points i've made here would be appropriate? I doubt it.
Here is where the other person's point was made, so answering it here is evidently appropriate.
Though your comment does give me an idea. Why not transport some of the posts here over to other threads where said posts may also be entirely appropriate. The wider the audience the better, don't you think?
===========================================================
Originally Posted by RED EYE
Every model has been wrong with the death rate..
It has been argued that it doesn't matter, since it served to save lives, save people from ill health (long & short term), & spare hospitals from being burdened beyond their capabilities to help the suffering & dying.
Chinese virus will end up comparable with the annual flu death rate.
Again, arguably, it doesn't matter. See above.
Furthermore, you don't know that.
Also, much is unknown about this virus, it's ability to mutate, when a vaccine might be available (if ever), potential 2nd/3rd waves upcoming, reinfection, the efficacy of various drug interventions (so-called "cures"), death rate, infection rate, if it may cause infection after being airborne for many hours, etc, etc, etc. COVID-19 has only been around for a few months. OTOH the flu has been studied for decades.
Better to overstate the potential harm than understate it leading to much greater negative consequences. For example, the 1918 Spanish flu.
Better safe than sorry.
Forty other threads where points i've made here would be appropriate? I doubt it.
Here is where the other person's point was made, so answering it here is evidently appropriate.
Though your comment does give me an idea. Why not transport some of the posts here over to other threads where said posts may also be entirely appropriate. The wider the audience the better, don't you think?
===========================================================
Originally Posted by RED EYE
Every model has been wrong with the death rate..
It has been argued that it doesn't matter, since it served to save lives, save people from ill health (long & short term), & spare hospitals from being burdened beyond their capabilities to help the suffering & dying.
Originally Posted by RED EYE
Chinese virus will end up comparable with the annual flu death rate.
Again, arguably, it doesn't matter. See above.
Furthermore, you don't know that.
Also, much is unknown about this virus, it's ability to mutate, when a vaccine might be available (if ever), potential 2nd/3rd waves upcoming, reinfection, the efficacy of various drug interventions (so-called "cures"), death rate, infection rate, if it may cause infection after being airborne for many hours, etc, etc, etc. COVID-19 has only been around for a few months. OTOH the flu has been studied for decades.
Better to overstate the potential harm than understate it leading to much greater negative consequences. For example, the 1918 Spanish flu.
Better safe than sorry.
Like I said earlier , I've made my points and you have in your threads.. all 100 of them.. not the 40 like I earlier posted
Forty other threads where points i've made here would be appropriate? I doubt it.
Here is where the other person's point was made, so answering it here is evidently appropriate.
Though your comment does give me an idea. Why not transport some of the posts here over to other threads where said posts may also be entirely appropriate. The wider the audience the better, don't you think?
===========================================================
Originally Posted by RED EYE
Every model has been wrong with the death rate..
It has been argued that it doesn't matter, since it served to save lives, save people from ill health (long & short term), & spare hospitals from being burdened beyond their capabilities to help the suffering & dying.
Originally Posted by RED EYE
Chinese virus will end up comparable with the annual flu death rate.
Again, arguably, it doesn't matter. See above.
Furthermore, you don't know that.
Also, much is unknown about this virus, it's ability to mutate, when a vaccine might be available (if ever), potential 2nd/3rd waves upcoming, reinfection, the efficacy of various drug interventions (so-called "cures"), death rate, infection rate, if it may cause infection after being airborne for many hours, etc, etc, etc. COVID-19 has only been around for a few months. OTOH the flu has been studied for decades.
Better to overstate the potential harm than understate it leading to much greater negative consequences. For example, the 1918 Spanish flu.
Better safe than sorry.
my thread title speaks for itself.. time for you to monitor your own 100 threads.. be gone
https://patch.com/california/los-angeles/933-vaccinated-angelenos-test-positive-covid-19-12-dies
LOS ANGELES, CA — Six months into the vaccination effort, Los Angeles County has recorded nearly 1,000 "breakthrough" cases in which fully vaccinated people went on to test positive for the coronavirus. Of those breakthrough cases, 71 were hospitalized and 12 died.
LOS ANGELES, CA — Six months into the vaccination effort, Los Angeles County has recorded nearly 1,000 "breakthrough" cases in which fully vaccinated people went on to test positive for the coronavirus. Of those breakthrough cases, 71 were hospitalized and 12 died.
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ad-heart-attack-wasnt-allergic-to-vaccine-moh
SINGAPORE - The Ministry of Health (MOH) has said that there was no indication that a 72-year-old woman who died a day after she received her first Covid-19 jab had had an allergic reaction to the vaccine.
It was responding on Saturday (June 19) to media queries about a Facebook post by Mr Andrew Tan, who questioned if his mother's death could have been caused by the vaccine.
Madam Doreen Chan received the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on June 3, and "everything seemed fine except for a sore arm", said Mr Tan in his post that had gone viral.
SINGAPORE - The Ministry of Health (MOH) has said that there was no indication that a 72-year-old woman who died a day after she received her first Covid-19 jab had had an allergic reaction to the vaccine.
It was responding on Saturday (June 19) to media queries about a Facebook post by Mr Andrew Tan, who questioned if his mother's death could have been caused by the vaccine.
Madam Doreen Chan received the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on June 3, and "everything seemed fine except for a sore arm", said Mr Tan in his post that had gone viral.
https://fox17.com/news/local/24-ful...ent-says-breakthrough-case-virus-coronavirus-
[FONT="]27 fully vaccinated people have died in Tennessee, health department says [/FONT]
[FONT="]by Kaylin Jorge
<time class="published-date" datetime="Friday, July 23rd 2021">Friday, July 23rd 2021</time>[/FONT]
[FONT="]27 fully vaccinated people have died in Tennessee, health department says [/FONT]
[FONT="]by Kaylin Jorge
<time class="published-date" datetime="Friday, July 23rd 2021">Friday, July 23rd 2021</time>[/FONT]
