Thursday 3/19/15 service plays chatter/comps/requests & other stuff...

Search
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
SAM MARTIN

E. Washington

We were waiting to see who Georgetown was matched up against - hoping for any team with even an average defense that we could pick to beat the Hoyas outright. We didn't get it, as Eastern Washington is all offense and no defense, and while an outright win by the Eagles wouldn't come as a shock, we feel much more comfortable taking the generous points and look for this one to come down to the wire.

It's no secret that Georgetown has fallen flat in this tournament in recent years, as they just don't seem to bring any energy or sense the urgency against teams they should beat on paper. This year, Georgetown isn't nearly as talented, and while didn't have much issue getting past the bottom of the Big East Conference, they didn't really stand out at any points this season either. Eastern Washington can score - putting up 80 ppg on 48% shooting. That's pretty good offense for a team getting this many points, and if the Eagles can play any defense at all they have a decent shot at sending Georgetown home early once again.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
SLEEPYJ

North Carolina -10.5

This is not the same Harvard team of years past...Well, neither is UNC, but i feel this UNC team will outclass this Harvard team in this one...UNC started to play well the last 6 or 7 games..They made anice push in the ACC tounament and beat the likes of Louisville & Virginia....The Tarheels will be a tough matchup here for Harvard in many areas...North Carolina is the nations #2 Rebounding team and #2 team in assists....I love to play on teams that are strong in those two categories...UNC does lack in other areas, but the teams points per game is ranked 17th at 77ppg...Those three individual stats really have me favoring a big victory for UNC....Harvard on the other hand is lucky to even be in this tournament. If Yale takes care of business a few games back, Yale is in this game...That's all water under the bridge at this point though....Harvard will come to play and i think at times early they can be competitive...Across the board though this is a big mismatch..As i indicated with some of the UNC stats, Harvard is far behind....When we just lay out tha basic avg's here on offense is a very wide margin...Ppg is in favor of UNC by 15ppg on offense...On defense Harvard gets the nod by 10ppg....Let's not forget what conf these teams are in....The Tarheels will win the rebounding game by a wide margin, and UNC will move the ball so well this Harvard defense won't be as effective as it has been in the past..Again the level of competition that Harvard has faced is not on the level of a UNC...UNC takes care of the basketball & they are pretty stout with steals and blocks...I think UNC will win the possession battle by a wide margin in this one. This is just a big mismatch in my eyes. I know some may think Harvard actually has a shot to surprise the Tarheels..I will be surprised if Harvard is even close in this game midway through the 1st half...UNC in wire to wire rout..81-60
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
JOE GAVAZZI

VCU +4

Clearly, the Committee felt that Ohio St., under 11th year HC Matta, failed in many step-up games as well as on the road. In fact, playing away from home, Ohio St. was just 5-8 SU, including losses at Louisville and North Carolina and in Big 10 play Indiana, Iowa, Purdue, Michigan St. and Michigan. Then there was that embarrassing LHG performance against Wisconsin (a 72-48 egg). Clearly, the Buckeyes are a high-profile team with frosh phenom, D’Angelo Russell. But, the results simply do not meet the hype. VCU has played through the loss of premier defender, Briante Weber for a four-game sweep of the A-10 crown, including a 20-point revenge romp over regular season champ, Davidson. That means the Rams’ record, away from home, is 14-5 SU, clearly, one of our Roadrunners. Motivated to erase the memory of last season’s First Round NCAA loss to SFA, and with a portfolio under fifth year Head Coach Shaka Smart that includes a record of 10-2 ATS as NCAA short in the last decade, it will be no surprise to this bureau if the Rams wreak havoc on this overrated Ohio St. Buckeye team.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
DAVE ESSLER

SF Austin +6.5

The initial move on this game was actually to SFA. Utah is very good - but they play really, really, slow. If that total gets anywhere near the 132 or so it's at now, that's even better for us. The L-jacks have lost four games this season, one since November 24th. That was the three game stretch against Baylor, Xavier, and Northern Iowa (who the almost beat). They play fairly quick, and every team that's beaten Utah this season has done just that. Utah will also shoot mostly three's, so it's live or die there, really. Actually, SFA has a more diverse offense, and create a fair amount of turnovers. They're small, but they're effective. They score about 80 points a game - which is a lot even in their conference. Last season they BEAT VCU in the first round before UCLA took them down, so Underwood and many of the L-Jacks have seen this before. Utah wasn't even IN this Tournament last year, so IMO it's the UTES with the pressure. I do like Krystowiak, but these are still young kids. I actually hope, as I said in that thread, that Delon Wright goes off, because when he does the rest of the team tends to stand around, and in most of their losses he's done TOO much. If Utah were THAT easy - the line have opened at -10 or something, which would STILL get public money.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
MIKE ANTHONY

Arkansas -7.5

Wofford does lay claim to having a pretty decent defense. They have at times shown that throughout the season. 16 times they held opponents to 60 or less. Not too shabby, overall. But will it be enough vs the Razorbacks? This is arguably the best Arkansas team in the 4 year tenure of Anderson. Portis and Qualls present more size and athleticism than Wofford has seen in months. A 16.1 to 11.7 TO/assist ratio speaks to their offensive efficiency, which allows them to score 78 PPG. Arkansas has to play gritty, keep to their game plan, and not get over confident and they should win by double digits Thursday night!
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
TONY GEORGE

Purdue -1

Not sold on Cincinnati, and they were a shock to me not winning their conference tourney as U Conn knocked them after beating only 1 ranked all year. Purdue battle tested in the tough big 10, have better guards and offense and Cincy scored just 59 ppg on neutral floors this year. The Big 10 was a battle ground this year, Purdue held their own and are battle tested. Cincinnati too inconsistent.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
JIM FEIST

Take: (708) LOS ANGELES LAKERS

Reason: Your Bonus Play for Thursday, March 19, 2015 is in the NBA scheduled contest between the Utah Jazz and the Lakers at the Staples Center in Los Angeles. Utah is a road favorite but this is a tough situational spot, the second of a back to back after playing Washington last night. Utah is 26th in the NBA in points scored, 29th in assists. The Jazz is 1-4 ATS against a team with a winning percentage below .400. The Lakers are rested and playing well, on a 7-1 ATS run. They haven't played since Monday, giving Golden State a run in a 108-105 game as a +18 dog. The Lakers are 5-2 ATS in their last 7 home games, 6-2-1 ATS playing on 2 days rest. LA is 5-2 ATS against Utah so grab the rested home team. Play the LA Lakers.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
NBA Odds and Predictions: Thursday, March 19 Opening Line Report and Handicapping
by Alan Matthews

With the NCAA Tournament kicking off in full on Thursday, it’s a light four-game schedule in the NBA and no TNT doubleheader this week as that network is also college basketball focused for a while. The game of the night, in my opinion, is the ghastly matchup between the Knicks and Timberwolves, the teams with the worst records in the NBA. The loser could be the big winner, potentially holding a key tiebreaker by the end of the season for the most ping-pong balls in the draft lottery. Here’s a look at all four games.

Timberwolves at Knicks (TBA)

Plenty of good seats available! Minnesota played in Toronto on Wednesday. Nearly half the Timberwolves of relevance other than Andrew Wiggins were questionable for that one (thus the TBA). No way I play them here, even if they could. I’m wanting to lose this game if I’m both teams. I actually thought the Knicks would cover against the Spurs on Tuesday night, but I sure didn’t expect a 104-100 overtime upset. New York became the first team in NBA history to enter a game this late in the season with a winning percentage below .200 and beat the defending champions. The Knicks were down 13 in the third quarter and tied it at 96 with 5.5 seconds left in regulation on a Lou Amundson layup. Tim Hardaway Jr. missed the game with a sprained right wrist. The Knicks lost at Minnesota 115-99 on Nov. 19 as the Wolves’ Kevin Martin had 37.

Key trends: The Wolves have covered just eight of their past 32 in the second of a back-to-back. New York is 1-4 against the spread in its past five Thursday games. The “over/under” has gone over in five of the past seven meetings.

Early lean: Wait on all the Wolves.



Nuggets at Rockets (-8.5, 213.5)

Denver’s four-game winning streak ended with a 92-81 loss at Memphis on Monday, but that wasn’t a surprise because the Nuggets sat starters Ty Lawson, Kenneth Faried and Danilo Gallinari. No, they weren’t hurt, and it wasn’t the players’ or coach’s call. It was the front office’s, and there still hasn’t been an explanation. I’ll give you one: the front office wants to lose as much as possible to improve draft position. Houston beat Orlando 107-94 on Tuesday for its second straight victory. James Harden had an off night, shooting 4-for-14 from the floor for 17 points. Coach Kevin McHale decided to start Joey Dorsey over Terrence Jones, who had started the past 11. I don’t think that’s a trend as Jones said it was a personal issue. Houston is 3-0 against Denver this year, scoring at least 108 points in each game.

Key trends: The Nuggets are 5-0 ATS in their past five games. Houston is 7-1 ATS in its past eight at home vs. teams with a losing road record. The over is 6-2 in the past eight meetings.

Early lean: If all the Nuggets play, they cover. Go over.



Pelicans at Suns (TBA)

Phoenix will be well-rested, having been off since a 102-89 home win over the Knicks on Sunday. Eric Bledsoe was a rebound shy of a triple-double. Suns starters Brandon Knight and Alex Len sat with sprained ankles. Both are called day-to-day (thus TBA). Neither practiced on Tuesday, and Len in particular seems unlikely to play. New Orleans stands to benefit the most from the injury to Oklahoma City’s Serge Ibaka. The Pelicans start a tough three-game road trip here. They beat the visiting Bucks 85-84 on Tuesday. Anthony Davis struggled from the field but still had 20 points and 12 rebounds. The Pelicans and Suns have met just once thus far, a 110-106 New Orleans home win on Dec. 30.

Key trends: The Pelicans are 8-1 ATS in their past nine road games vs. teams with a winning home record. Phoenix is 11-2 ATS in its past 13 after a double-digit win. The under is 6-0 in the Suns’ past six games. The home team has covered the past four meetings.

Early lean: I like the Pelicans whether Len and/or Knight play or not
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Only the Biggest of the Big NCAA Betting Favorites cover the spread
By Jason Logan

NCAA tournament bettors are used to tangling with towering piles of chalk in the Round of 64, and this year’s Big Dance is no exception.

Oddsmakers have pegged the Arizona Wildcats as 23-point favorites versus Texas Southern, set Villanova as a 22.5-point fave against Lafayette, and are now dealing Wisconsin -20 versus Coastal Carolina in its tournament opener.

On top of those big spreads, the No. 1 overall seed, Kentucky Wildcats, will undoubtedly face a monstrous number of points when its Round of 64 opponent (either Manhattan or Hampton) is decided in the play-in game Tuesday.

Going back to 1998, teams favored by 20 points or more in the NCAA tournament are 74-1 SU and 36-37-2 ATS. That lone upset came in 2012 at the hands of No. 15 seed Norfolk State, which knocked off No. 2 Missouri 86-84 as a 21-point underdog in the Round of 64.

Breaking down those big favorites, teams giving between 20 and 23 points – like those three mentioned above – are just 10-15-1 (40%) ATS since 1998. NCAA favorites between 23.5 points and 28 points are 17-18-1 (48%) ATS in that same span. It’s been the biggest favorites, however, that have handled their business on the court and at the sports book during tournament tilts, with faves between 28.5 points and higher going 9-4 ATS (69%) since 1998.

The loftiest point spread in that 16-year stretch were the 1999 Duke Blue Devils, who were pegged as 47-point favorites versus Florida A&M in the Round of 64, falling short of that cover with a 99-58 win. In fact, six of the seven biggest tournament spreads in that time belong to Duke. The Blue Devils have been NCAA favorites of 20 or more points 14 times, going 8-6 ATS in those contests.

Arizona is facing a 20-plus spread for the fifth time in the past 17 tournaments, going 3-1 ATS in those previous games. The lone ATS loss came as 27.5-point chalk against Jackson State in 2000, with the Wildcats winning 71-47.

Note: Those 75 NCAA tournament games with spreads of 20 points or more since 1998 have produced a 35-40 Over/Under record, with spreads between 20 and 24 points going 13-18 Over/Under (58% Under).
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Beware of No-Name Teams
By Jim Feist

It's that time of year again: Basketball games night and day, day and night and after a few hours of sleep, we wake up the next day and go through it all over again. College tournament play is one of the most enjoyable times of the year for sports fans and bettors, with a seemingly endless stream of action and excitement.

Big name schools often end up playing for the title. The champions the last ten years have been UConn (twice), Louisville, Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina (twice), Kansas and Florida (twice). But let’s pay some respect to the smaller schools who got there, with tiny Butler of the Horizon League. going back to back in 2009-10.

We’ve seen big name programs lose the title game in Ohio State, Illinois, Kansas, UCLA and Michigan. Big names, all of them, with no surprise schools like Pacific, Winthrop, Ohio or Stony Brook ever sneaking in. Large, high profile schools have big athletic budgets and enough scholarships to attract some of the top basketball talent, which is a key to their success.

However, this doesn't mean smaller, lesser-known schools can't compete with the big boys at times, especially when you look at one 40-minute game. There are countless examples for sports bettors, including last season. Butler is one example of many the last two seasons as this is the time of year for upsets and surprises.

Think for a moment: Before winning the title in 2010 you don't remember seeing Duke much in the Big Dance the previous three years ago, did you? That's because the Blue Devils got upset in the first round, losing to VCU, 79-77. One year they nipped Belmont, 71-70, then lost to West Virginia, and in 2009 Duke survived two games before Villanova blew them out, 77-54.

Don’t forget George Mason out of the Colonial Athletic Association. The Patriots made it to the Final Four by knocking off Michigan State, North Carolina and UConn. They were 5, 6 and 8 point dogs in those games. A few years ago in the first round alone, Wisconsin-Milwaukee upset Alabama 83-73, UConn squeaked by Central Florida 77-71 as a 19-point favorite, Bucknell stunned Kansas 64-63, and Vermont took Syracuse to overtime and won 60-57.

Did you forget all those surprises? With so many games in March and the big names that usually end up in the Final Four, it is easy to forget the early rounds. How about tiny Holy Cross a few years ago? The Crusaders had to face Dwyane Wade and Marquette in the tournament opener and as a 10-point dog, Holy Cross covered in a 72-68 game. Holy Cross also gave mighty Kansas, with Drew Gooden and Nick Collison, a run for their money. At first glance, some of the games look like mismatches, but a good handicapper is skilled in the art of careful analysis and patience.

Every year one or two little known teams make memorable runs. Which brings up a good point for serious sports bettors: It is not wise to take big favorites on the money-line. The payoff is poor, and successful sports wagering is as much about money management as it is picking winners. Taking a shot with a big dog who you think might be able to hang in there is much smarter than wagering $900 to win $100, for example, on a minus-900 favorite. Surprising upsets happen all the time.

Several things are happening. One is the old NFL axiom, "On any given Sunday" one team can beat another, regardless of record or talent. Sometimes the better team simply has a bad night shooting the basketball, or the big underdog can't miss. One of the most memorable upsets came in the 1985 NCAA Finals when Villanova, a 10-point 'dog, upset mighty Georgetown, 66-64. The Wildcats hit 22-of-28 field goals, a sizzling 78%. It would be tough to beat ANY underdog that shoots 78%!

Another reason is that some smaller schools happen to have NBA-caliber talent, such as current star Stephen Curry who starred at Davidson. You never know: schools like Albany, SMU and Florida Gulf Coast just might be showcasing future NBA talent this month.

Other times a small school has a great coach or a collection of talented kids who play tough defense and believe in themselves enough to upset traditional powers. You may recall a March tourney where the Detroit Titans upset UCLA 56-53 and Weber State beat mighty North Carolina 76-74 as a +14 dog. Teams are generally motivated to play in the NCAA tournament, but this isn't always the case with the NIT. Some teams that were hoping to get to the Big Dance are disappointed at being selected for lower-seeded tournies and aren't always focused for their best effort.

Sometimes there are look-ahead spots, where a high-seeded team might be looking past an opponent it might not take seriously. That's what appeared to happen in the game I mentioned earlier, Kansas against Holy Cross. Kansas needed a second half push to top the Crusaders 70-59 as a 29-point favorite. It also wouldn't have been the first time a small school upset a big-name program. Don't take big favorites on the money-line and don't simply lay the points on the more famous conference or school without doing your homework, because tourney time is loaded with surprises.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Handicapping No. 5 vs. No. 12
By ASA

Since 1990, No. 5 seeds are just 59-37 straight up (61.5%) and 44-51-1 (45.8%) against the spread vs. 12-seeds.

There have been just two years since 1990 that a No. 12 seed hasn't upset a No. 5 seed.

Three No. 12 seeds won in the 2014 NCAA Tournament as Stephen F. Austin, Harvard, and North Dakota State all captured victories.

Let's take a closer look at the candidates to continue the trend this season.

West Regional - No. 12 Wofford Terriers (+7.5) vs. No. 5 Arkansas
Date: Thursday, Mar. 19
Venue: Veterans Memorial Arena
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

The Terriers notched the regular season title in the Southern Conference and locked up a Big Dance berth for the fourth time in the past six years under coach Mike Young. Prior to breezing through the Southern Conference slate they played a gauntlet of a non-conference schedule, traveling to Stanford, NC State, West Virginia, and Duke.

That’s solid experience that they can rely on prior to this week’s matchup with Arkansas. Their top four players are upperclassmen who were around when they lost to 2nd-seeded Michigan in last year’s tournament. Defensively they rank 27th in PPG allowed and 31st in opponents three-point field goal percentage – two aspects that will be challenged by the hot shooting, high-octane offense of Arkansas. The Razorbacks have dropped three of their last six games, but two of those were against No. 1 Kentucky.

South Regional - No. 12 Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks (+6.5) vs. No. 5 Utah
Date: Thursday, Mar. 19
Venue: Moda Center
Location: Portland, Oregon

The Lumberjacks are 26-1 in their last 27 games, easily notching the Southland Conference regular season title and cruising through the conference tournament. They’ve notched their 2nd straight NCAA Tournament appearance after defeating VCU as a 12 seed last season.

Defensively this team can be a nightmare matchup. They force 16.6 turnovers per game (6th nationally) and are able to capitalize on those turnovers (19th in KenPom’s adjusted offensive efficiency). Five players average at least 8.4 PPG, including top scorers Walkup and Parker, who led the way in the upset of VCU last year. The Lumberjacks will have their hands full with 5th-seeded Utah, who enter the tournament as one of six teams that rank in the top 20 in both offensive & defensive efficiency.

Midwest Regional - No. 12 Buffalo Bulls (+4.5) vs. No. 5 West Virginia
Date: Friday, Mar. 20
Venue: Nationwide Arena
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Many people took note of the Bulls after two strong non-conference showings. First at Kentucky (led at halftime over the Wildcats) then at Wisconsin (lost by 12 in a competitive game). This Buffalo team can score fast (25th in PPG) and efficiently (49th in adjusted offensive efficiency). They don’t turn the ball over much and they rebound well, both factors will be important against West Virginia in the round of 64.

The Mountaineers thrive when they force turnovers (1st nationally forcing 19.6 TO/G) as it leads to easy buckets off takeaways. Their aggressive play leads to a lot of silly fouls (23.2 fouls per game – first in NCAA) and they struggle to score in the half-court (41.2% from the field). WVU has dropped three of its last four games while Buffalo is riding an eight-game winning streak.

East Regional - No. 12 Wyoming Cowboys (+7) vs. No. 5 Northern Iowa
Date: Friday, Mar. 20
Venue: Key Arena
Location: Seattle, Washington

The Cowboys got to the tournament the old fashioned way: notching the automatic bid by winning the Mountain West Conference Tournament. They knocked off streaking Boise State and outlasted San Diego State in back-to-back nights. Leading scorer Larry Nance Jr. missed a string of games in February, causing Wyoming’s offense to struggle for a long stretch.

Nance appears to be back at full strength (17.8 PPG & 7.0 RPG over the last 5) and it’s no coincidence that Wyoming is playing its best ball of the year. For the first game in the tournament, Wyoming gets Northern Iowa, who many believe is under-seeded after finishing 30-3 and winning the MVC Conference Tournament.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
College Basketball Betting: NCAA BIG DANCE BETTING TIPS
Scott Spreitzer


Next to the Super Bowl, college basketball’s NCAA Tournament is the biggest sports betting event of the year in Las Vegas. Sports books are jam-packed through opening weekend as avid fans from all over the country flock here for the experience of a lifetime.

Sports books love the energy…and all the money they make from casual bettors who may not always realize that they’re taking the worst of it in the markets!

Here are some keys I will be using when handicapping the Big Dance.

*Media-hyped conferences and teams are generally over-priced in the line. Sportsbooks charge a premium on these teams because the public wants to bet them. Compounding matters, those teams are often overrated anyway! Think about the ACC last year. Conference champion Virginia was a #1 seed that couldn’t get past the Sweet 16. Duke and Syracuse were both #3 seeds who fell early. Duke lost to #14 seed Mercer the first time they took the floor. Syracuse lost to #11 Dayton in its second game. Public bettors were paying a premium on what were already bad lines once it was realized that the ACC as a whole was overrated.

TIP: Look for great spots to fade media darlings. Study unheralded entries to see if you can discover potential Cinderellas who have the talent and experience to succeed.

*Three-point heavy teams can be over-priced in the line. This is because they post such big numbers in their victories that they seem like super-teams. Well, they are when the bombs are falling. But, when those shots are clanking off the rim, three-point heavy teams turn mortal very quickly. It’s much harder to string together good shooting games on neutral courts in tournament style basketball than it is during the regular season. Filling your office pool brackets with trey-heavy teams is a recipe for heartbreak. Backing them against the point-spread does the same thing. When you win…you’ll cover by a lot of points. That doesn't help you if you’re only winning 40-45% of these bets.

TIP: Avoid trey-heavy offenses. Look to bet on balanced teams who can score inside and out, and who play well on both sides of the floor. If you study the stats closely, you’ll notice that many trey-heavy teams are hiding fairly soft defenses that tend to get exposed in March.

*The public tends to treat the tournament like roulette. By that, I mean that some want to bet “hot” teams who they think will keep playing well. Others want to bet “the due theory” if a team just survived a nail-biter and is in position to bounce back strong. The thing about roulette is…everybody loses! You can’t beat roulette over time because the 0 and 00 on the board take everyone’s money. You can’t beat the tournament playing “hot” or “bounce back” teams because the vigorish eats away at bad strategies. Every NCAA tournament game is a chess match, not a wheel spin. Smart bettors handicap the chess match to find real edges that matter.

TIP: Focus on the strengths and weaknesses of each team (and head coach) and evaluate games accordingly. Hey, sometimes a team will look “hot” because their skill set is well-suited to tournament basketball (like Connecticut last season). But, the Huskies didn’t run the table because they were “hot.” They cut down the nets because great defense and guard play are proven advantages in the Dance! Chasing “hot” just puts you on teams who are about to crash and burn after playing a game or two over their heads. Focusing on strengths and weaknesses will help you top the needed win percentage to overcome vigorish.

To help you find teams who are best suited to win chess matches, I strongly recommend the following:

*Look for experienced point guards who can score and pass
*Look for rebounding teams, particularly defensive rebounding teams
*Look for head coaches who have consistently performed well in the Dance
*Look for teams who enjoy friendly travel/crowd scenarios
*Look for teams who were playing their best basketball in the last month of the season

Now, a list of characteristics for teams who are worst suited to win chess matches

*Fade offenses that are turnover prone, particularly those with inexperienced guards
*Fade poor rebounding teams, particularly those who struggle on the defensive end
*Fade head coaches who have a history of leaving the brackets earlier than expected
*Fade teams in awkward travel or “body clock” scenarios
*Fade teams who peaked in the first half of the season but struggled down the stretch

Smart handicappers will have done a lot of work researching these issues in advance of plucking down their money. If you’re serious about making money this month…you should attack that process yourself. Let the casual fans throw their money away on overpriced favorites or uninformed Cinderella hunches. Follow proven strategies to insure that you’re making smart bets so you make the most of March Madness!

Good luck, as always...Scott Spreitzer.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
NCAAB Long Shots to Watch
By Bruce Marshall

Another March, another Selection Sunday. By now we have stopped trying to analyze, at least too much, the machinations of the NCAA Selection Committee. In the end, irrespective of seeding arguments, as long as the proper 68 teams are in the field, complaints should be few. And, with the exception of some angry Colorado State and Temple fans, we suspect there were not many around the country who were too upset with the composition of the brackets when they were announced by Greg Gumbel this past Sunday on CBS.

(Seeding questions, however, were another matter; something we will discuss in a moment.)

If we have a problem, however, it's the slant once again back toward the power conferences, who not unexpectedly dominated the at-large contingent. While this did not seem a deep year for the mid-majors, that designation seems to be spreading further and further in the college ranks. It is a term used too loosely and now seems to even encompass the American, which produced last year's NCAA champion UConn, which up until two years ago campaigned in the Big East. The A-10, which appeared to have five potential invitees, instead got only three, with one of those (Dayton) forced into an at-large play-in game, albeit on its own court, vs. Boise State.

The American and Mountain West also had two of the teams that might feel most-aggrieved by the process, as aforementioned Temple and Colorado State had to feel as if their expected bids were stolen by the Selection Committee. It would appear as if the Owls were the last team bypassed, thanks to a rare bit of candor by Selection Committee chairman Scott Barnes, the Utah State AD who once upon a time was a star forward on some of Boyd Grant's better Fresno State teams in the early '80s. Barnes, breaking ranks with past committee chairs who would refrain from discussing committee specifics as if they were national security secrets, admitted that bubble-buster Wyoming, the Mountain West Tourney champ, had effectively bumped Temple from the field. Continuing on that path, Barnes also admitted that if UConn had beaten SMU in Sunday's American finale, it would have replaced Dayton in the field of 68. After listening to past committee chairs bob and weave like Floyd Mayweather in the face of pointed questions from the talking heads on CBS or ESPN, it was actually a bit refreshing to see Barnes not treat the process as if he were representing the CIA rather than the NCAA.

As for CSU, it would outwardly seem as if it got caught in a number crunch that would prevent the committee from inviting more than three Mountain West reps, though if Barnes is to be believed, CSU was probably finished after it lost in a Mountain West Tourney semifinal vs. San Diego State, as he said that Temple, not CSU, was the team bumped by Wyoming. In the bigger picture, the Mountain West ought to think twice about continuing to include weak link San Jose State, which rarely competed equally while in the lesser WAC, or even the much-lesser Big West in the '80s and '90s, and whose wretched 2-27 season would cost the Mountain West dearly in conference power ratings. Thanks in good part to the weak-link Spartans, the conference as a whole was downgraded, rated as only 12th best in the land. For other reasons we will discuss at a later time, San Jose's continuing inclusion in the Mountain West could continue to damage the league's power rating. And, as might have been the case on Selection Sunday, helped cost the league an extra spot in the field of 68.

The Committee's power-conference bias seemed to be reflected in granting straight passage to the likes of Texas, UCLA, and Indiana, all without having to even participate in one of the two at-large play-in games at Dayton. The SEC's Ole Miss is the only power conference rep that is among the four at-large play-in combatants. In the end, the next power conference team to miss the cut was probably Miami-Florida, which most conceded had little chance of securing an invitation. And after only seven mid-major at-large bids in 2014 after 11 each in the past two years, seven in 2011, and eight in 2010, there were just seven again this season, which counts former Big East member Cincinnati, from the American, Davidson and Dayton from the A-10, Boise State and San Diego State from the Mountain West, BYU from the WCC, and Wichita State (in the Final Four two years ago) from the Missouri Valley.

Speaking of the Missouri Valley, many "Bracketologists" (including ourselves) were a bit SUprised to see both of its powerhouse reps, Northern Iowa and Wichita State, seeded outside of "protected territory" (1 thru 4 in the regions), especially UNI, which was 30-3 SU and won Arch Madness in St. Louis, but was only rewarded with a five seed in the East and a sub-regional trip out to Seattle to face a dangerous Wyoming. Wichita was placed as a 7 in the Midwest, though we are not too concerned about the seed, as the Shockers can finally get a chance to play in-state Kansas, which never wants to schedule Wichita in the regular season, if each advance beyond opening sub-regional action. Sometimes, there is devilish streak in the Committee that we rather enjoy, and this could be one of those instances.

The process, however, remains stacked for the power conference sides, whose teams eventually play one another in league games, which helps strengthen the computer numbers for all of conference members. All because the data, fed into the computers by people, rate the power conference teams as stronger. Those bases for comparison are thus always going to be slanted toward the power conference teams, justifying their dominance of the at-large bids.

The basis for all of those calculations is nothing more, however, than the old "eye test." It does not take a computer to figure out that the ACC is a stronger league than the Atlantic Sun. But for the computer programs to supposedly see through straight won-loss records and divine the better teams and conferences, and whether Indiana is better than Temple or Colorado State, the calculations had to begin with a human opinion, or assumption, built into the program.

Whatever, as within a couple of days no one will remember anything about Colorado State or Temple being bypassed and will instead sit down and enjoy the Big Dance. While many of the recent fields have been well-balanced, we suspect it might be even more so this season...at least beyond the top line or two. Once the regions got down to the three line, the teams all began to look rather similar, and we suggest that no result involving any teams seeded three thru sixteen is going to be much of an upset at all. With the exception of games involving 1 vs. 16 seeds, and 2 vs. 15 seeds (though we see a couple of potential scraps in those quartets of games), we would not base any handicap of the upcoming games on tourney seeding.

ANY SURPRISES IN THE HOUSE?

The unexpected runs of mid-majors such as George Mason, Butler, and Virginia Commonwealth into the Final Four in recent years, and SUprise packages like Florida Gulf Coast storming the Sweet 16 two years ago, have prompted us to offer a "mid-major alert," highlighting teams to watch that could emerge and deliver a similar-like run in the Dance. Following are a handful of those sides that we would watch closely...

Eastern Washington (SU 26-8; seeded 13th in South)...The Big Sky tourney champ Eagles have popped up on the national radar a few times this season, first when upsetting Indiana at Bloomington on November 24, and then with volume-shooting G Tyler Harvey (22.9 ppg) leading the nation in scoring at various times throughout the campaign. Harvey, who pumped in 42 points in last week's tourney quarterfinal win over Idaho, has been compared by some regional observers to another Eagle alum, Rodney Stuckey, currently scoring points in the NBA for the Indiana Pacers. Harvey, whose HS teammate from Bishop Montgomery in Torrance, CA is third-leading scorer, 6-7 F Ognjen Miljkovic (10 ppg), has also maintained a 43% clip from the beyond the arc for the past two seasons, but is not the only threat for EWU, which has a good inside-outside combo with rugged 6-8 PF Venky Jois (16.6 ppg) doing most of his scoring work around the bucket. The Eagles like to run, tallying 80.8 ppg (ranked 3rd nationally), hit 48% from the floor and slightly better than 40% beyond the arc for well-respected HC Jim Hayford, a disciple of legendary NAIA HC Bill Odell from Azusa-Pacific. The Eagles got a slight break from the selection committee, sent within the region to Portland to face Georgetown on Thursday in sub-regional action.

Stephen F. Austin (SU 29-4; seeded 12th in South)...Last year we warned about the Lumberjacks, who proceeded to stun Virginia Commonwealth in the sub-regional at San Diego before getting KO'd by UCLA in the Round of 32. Three starters return from that team led by slashing 6-4 jr. G Thomas Walkup (15.7 ppg) and 6-6 sr. F Jacob Parker (14.1 ppg and 47% beyond the arc). Totally unselfish team coached by Brad Underwood, in his second year on the job in Nacogdoches after working as an assistant for Frank "The Bouncer" Martin at Kansas State and South Carolina following a decorated juco head coaching career. The Lumberjacks' only non-league losses came against Big Dance-bound teams (Northern Iowa in OT, and heavier losses to Xavier and Baylor), with a 12-point win at Memphis the best result.

North Dakota State (SU 24-9, seeded 15th in South)...If these guys sound familiar, they should, after the Bison knocked off Oklahoma in the sub-regional before losing to San Diego State in the Round of 32 last March. But the team has a slightly different look from last year's senior-dominated group coached by Saul Phillips, who moved to Ohio U after last season. Former assistant David Richman was promoted to take Phillips' place and oversaw a bumpy beginning to the season, as three new starters were in place for early lopsided losses at Texas and Iowa and more road defeats a few weeks later at Southern Miss and Montana.

But a mid-December win over Akron signaled a turnaround, and Richman was able to uncover a 6-6 frosh perimeter scoring force in shooting guard A.J. Jacobson (11.9 ppg), who had several big games as the season progressed and took some of the scoring burden from do-everything 6-3 senior. PG Lawrence Alexander (18.9 ppg), who shoots 44% from beyond the arc. The Bison, who prefer to control the pace, survived a bristling Summit race and tourney in Sioux Falls with a nervy 57-56 win over rival South Dakota State in the tourney finale. By the end of the season, NDSU looked a lot like last year's Big Dance entrant.

New Mexico State (SU 23-10, seeded 15th in South)...The Aggies might look familiar on these pages, as we used to cover them regularly when WAC games were included on the "big board" until 2013. While the rest of the WAC splintered, NMSU remained in the fold and has continued as the dominant team in the far-flung loop, making its fourth straight Big Dance appearance for HC Marvin Menzies, who has been able to use his worldwide connections (through Ag outfitter Adidas) to put together another international squad featuring two players from France, another from Cameroon, another from South Africa, and five from Canada (all from Toronto).

Among those imports are almost all of the Ags' key players, including smooth-stroking 6-8 Frenchy F Remi Barry (13.3 ppg), 6-9 Cameroonian frosh F Pascal Siakam (13 ppg; brother James plays at Vanderbilt), skywalking 6-2 Canadian Daniel Mullings, and imposing 6-10 C Chili Nephawe, a product of Johannesburg. With the exception of Siakam, the others have multiple NCAA games under their belts, and the team has great size and length, covering lots of ground on the defensive perimeter and being intimidating under the bucket. Took San Diego State into OT in the sub-regionals last season, and played another daunting non-league slate, part of which without key cogs Mullings and Nephawe, both injured for chunks of the season. They're both healthy now, and this intriguing blend of imposing athleticism could be a tough test for Kansas on Friday at Omaha.

Coastal Carolina (SU 24-9, seeded 16th in West)...Most observers believe the Chanticleers are one of the better 16 seeds in recent memory...or at least since last season, when the same Chants were also a 16 and gave East top seed Virginia a big scare before finally succumbing in the final minutes by a 70-59 count. Last season marked a milestone for vet HC Cliff Ellis, who took his fourth different school (earlier South Alabama, Clemson, and Auburn) to the Dance. With much the same look as a year ago with four starters back in the mix, the Chants impressed in pre-league play, beating Ellis' former Auburn as well as ULM, coming close at Ole Miss, and losing honorably at UCLA, before dealing with a better-than-advertised Big South Conference and once again stealing the league tourney crown in Myrtle Beach.

Most of the offense is generated from a veteran backcourt featured in last year's Dance and highlighted by Gs Warren Gillis (13.1 ppg), Josh Cameron (12.9 ppg), and Elijah Wilson (11.1 ppg). The Chants can spread the floor and attack from the wings, and after last year's upset big vs. Virginia, will have no fear of another 1 seed, Wisconsin, in sub-regional action at Omaha on Friday.

Wofford (SU 28-6, seeded 12th in West)...Another one of the 12 seeds given a good chance by the TV pundits, who note an 8-4 SU record by the 12s against the 5s over the past three years. Wofford is also familiar to Big Dance fans for several tourney visits in recent seasons, including a year ago, for vet HC Mike Young, who has almost the same team from last season, including all five starters, that lost to Michigan, 57-40, in sub-regional action. The Terriers are still led by smooth and savvy G Karl Cochran, again the leading scorer at 14.6 ppg, and backcourt mate Spencer Collins, an explosive 6-4 jr. who scored 26 in a key late-season win at Mercer that helped wrap up the SoCon regular-season crown for Wofford.

The Terriers, who took every team's best shot in league play, SUvived a tense conference tourney in Asheville for the second year in a row, and had earlier beaten the likes of NC State and Iona in non-league play, while losing to higher-profile Stanford, West Virginia, and Duke. In other words, the Terriers have played some people this season. Steady team, with ballhandlers at every position and able to control pace and tempo, Wofford is a hard to "speed up" and presents a fascinating sub-regional matchup vs. high-pressure Arkansas on Thursday at Jacksonville.

Let's hope we're still talking about one or more of these teams next week for the Sweet 16; the tourney is always a bit more memorable when at last one Cinderella side emerges! Start the music...let the Big Dance begin!
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Bettors fading UCLA in Round of 64

The majority of March Madness money will come in on Thursday and Friday for the NCAA tournament’s Round of 64.

Books have, however, adjusted the spreads for a handful of games with early money dictating the move. Here seven Round of 64 matchups drawing money from sharps and where those numbers are at as the tournament gets underway Tuesday.

No. 11 UCLA Bruins vs. No. 6 SMU Mustangs – Open: -2, Move: -4

UCLA was the black sheep of Selection Sunday, somehow making it into the Big Dance as an 11 seed. That’s carried over to the betting market, where money on the Mustangs has moved this spread as much as two points at some books.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
NCAAB Fade Alert - Overseeded Teams
By Joe Nelson

2015 NCAA Tournament: Over Seeded Teams 16-to-1

Once the games start the bracket debate quiets down but here is a look at each seed line with a team that perhaps found a more favorable position than deserved. It is a unique challenge to put the field together and ultimately the final result is not always entirely fair to everyone.

East Regional - No. 16 Lafayette: It was somewhat shocking that Patriot League tournament champion Lafayette did not end up in one of the First Four games. The Patriot League has produced a few upsets in recent years so perhaps the conference was given more respect but the Leopards were just a .500 team in conference play. They upset top seed Bucknell in the Patriot semifinals and then benefitted from other upsets by getting to play No. 6 seed American in the final to make their first NCAA Tournament appearance since 2000. Lafayette did beat First Four No. 16 Robert Morris by 27 in the season opener to perhaps create some separation. Lafayette is actually one of the few teams in the country that is a better three-point shooting team than their round of 64 foe Villanova.

West Regional - No. 15 Texas Southern: Most power rankings would call Texas Southern the second worst team in the tournament yet the Tigers landed a spot on the 15-line. The committee rewarded playing a tough non-conference schedule and a few marquee wins as Texas Southern opened the season 3-10 through an absolute gauntlet of major conference road games before closing the season with wins in 19 of the final 21 games against more reasonable competition. Early season upsets on the road at Michigan State and at Kansas State certainly raised eyebrows as well but the SWAC is always one of the lowest rated conferences and those wins months ago did not warrant the move up over more deserving teams like North Florida and Coastal Carolina.

South Regional - No. 14 UAB: The Blazers are another team whose profile was boosted in the committee’s eyes by losing to quality teams early in the season as UAB took defeats against Wisconsin, North Carolina and a handful of other major conference teams. This is a young team that improved as the season went on but that was only good enough for 5th place in the regular season standings in Conference USA. The conference tournament featured three big wins that happened to be across town from campus in Birmingham and UAB only had to play one of the top three teams due to Middle Tennessee State’s run of upsets who UAB faced in the final with the Blue Raiders having to play four games in four days.

South Regional - No. 13 Eastern Washington: It felt like a bit of a down year for the Big Sky which in past seasons has often been one of the stronger small conferences. Four teams were separated by just a game on top of the regular season standings and Eastern Washington snuck out three narrow wins to advance to the NCAA Tournament for just the second time ever for the program. The Eagles made some noise with a November win at Indiana and then started 10-1 in league play before fading down the stretch. First round opponent Georgetown has an upset risk history but ultimately the Eagles are fortunate to not be in a 3/14 or 2/15 matchup.

East Regional - No. 12 Wyoming: The Mountain West has rarely lived up to its billing in the NCAA Tournament and a Wyoming squad that finished tied for fourth in the league in the regular season wound up winning the conference tournament with three wins by two, five in overtime, and two. Wyoming had lost five of the final regular season games before catching fire in Las Vegas and the Cowboys were rewarded with a generous seed. Teams like Georgia State and Valparaiso could make strong cases for being on the 12-line instead as both were regular season and tournament champions from conferences that really don’t rate substantially weaker than the Mountain West.

South Regional - No. 11 UCLA: While UCLA’s controversial inclusion in the tournament generated a lot of debate the bigger issue is that they are not in one of the First Four matchups. The Bruins did take on a great schedule and a young team clearly did pass the eye-test late in the season with improved play and some big wins though this was a squad that did very little away from home, finishing 4-12 in road and neutral site games. Ultimately any of the No. 11 seeds in the first four grouping could make a pretty reasonable case that they have a better resume than UCLA. The far proximity to Dayton argument doesn’t hold up either as western squads BYU and Boise State were sent packing to western Ohio and UCLA wound up being sent to Louisville anyway.

Midwest Regional - No. 10 Indiana: It looked very possible that Tom Cream was going to have to turn down the NIT for a second straight season as the Hoosiers looked to most squarely on the bubble by Selection Sunday. The committee put Indiana in pretty comfortably as a No. 10 seed even with 13 losses and a 5-9 run to close the season despite the emphasis on late season play shown in other selections. Indiana’s win over Butler in December wound up carrying a lot of weight as the committee clearly respected the Big East in the seeding more than most expected. Indiana went just 9-9 in a pretty mediocre Big Ten and they won just three road games all season.

Midwest Regional - No. 9 Purdue: Purdue seemed to be a bubble team late in the season and the NCAA Tournament prospects looked in real jeopardy as they struggled to pull away from Penn State in the Big Ten tournament. The Boilermakers did go 12-6 in the Big Ten but they faced Wisconsin, Maryland, Michigan State, and Iowa just once each for a very favorable slate. Usually one bad loss can be overcome but Purdue had non-conference misses against Kansas State, North Florida, Gardner Webb, and Vanderbilt when the Commodores were not playing particularly well. It is good to see Purdue back in the big dance but this was a team that probably deserved to be seeded closer to the cut line.

West Regional - No. 8 Oregon: The Ducks were a No. 7 seed last season in this same region and if they win they will get a rematch with Wisconsin, who beat Oregon in a thrilling game in the round of 32 as a No. 2 seed. Oregon played well down the stretch to recover from a mediocre start to the season but this year’s team is nowhere near as good as last year’s team was, just compare the games with Arizona, the clear top team in the Pac-12 both seasons. The best non-conference wins for Oregon this season came against Illinois and Toledo and the 25-9 record was boosted by three overtime wins and several other narrow escapes.

West Regional - No. 7 Virginia Commonwealth: It would be interesting to see where VCU would have been seeded had they lost Sunday’s A-10 final against Dayton, who was sent to the First Four. A Rams squad that underachieved relative to expectations all season wound up with a favorable seed but a very tough first matchup. VCU lost six of the final 11 regular season games before getting some momentum in the conference tournament with four straight wins though they trailed Fordham late in the first game and probably deserved to lose to Richmond in a wild late comeback before posting more convincing wins over Davidson and Dayton. The double-overtime win over Northern Iowa carries a lot of weight for the Rams and perhaps speculation that Briante Weber could return boosted their stature.

West Regional - No. 6 Xavier: The Musketeers finished in 6th place in the Big East out of just 10 teams in the regular season standings yet Xavier is one of three Big East teams to earn No. 6 seeds in the tournament. A case can be made that Butler and Providence are posted a bit high as well but Xavier is the most glaring of the three, going just 9-9 in league play and featuring no real wins of substance in non-conference play. Losses to UTEP, Long Beach State, and Auburn in non-conference play also seemingly went unpunished. The positives for Xavier really hinge on owning Georgetown with three wins against the Hoyas boosting the resume and having played highly ranked Villanova three times to boost the strength of schedule even though Xavier lost by double-digits each time.

Midwest Regional - No. 5 West Virginia: The Big XII was certainly a strong and deep league but West Virginia went 2-7 in games vs. the top four teams in the league. The 11-7 record in conference play features more than half of the wins coming against the bottom three teams in the conference. A neutral site win over NC State is really all the Mountaineers can hang their hat on in the non-conference season that produced a 12-1 record over mostly light competition. Had West Virginia not snuck out a one-point home win over Kansas in February the Mountaineers could easily have been dropped several spots on the bracket.

East Regional - No. 4 Louisville: There was outrage last season when the defending national champions were given a No. 4 seed in the tournament. This season’s team has the same draw even though there is big gap between those teams. There is actually a huge gap between this year’s Louisville team in January and the team that finished the season without Chris Jones as Louisville wound up losing half of the final 10 games. The big win over Virginia is all that is holding things together for Louisville as this has been a really poor shooting team now without its best perimeter shooter. The ACC was very strong this season but Louisville went 2-6 vs. ACC teams that made the NCAA Tournament field.

South Regional - No. 3 Iowa State: The Cyclones were a No. 3 seed last season that fell in the Sweet 16 in a tight game with eventual champion Connecticut. This year’s team doesn’t have the best two players from that team but the Cyclones managed to get back to the 3-line with a 12-6 record in Big XII, finishing third in the conference as incredibly four Big XII teams were seeded as the top 12 teams in the tournament. The Cyclones are the most exciting of those teams but also the most erratic as the recent run of comeback wins has displayed. Iowa State didn’t always pull those games out with losses to South Carolina, Texas Tech, and Kansas State this season, a worse trio than most of the other high seeds claim.

South Regional - No. 2 Gonzaga: Obviously all the top seeds had excellent seasons but when on Selection Sunday all the potential No. 1 seeds hope to have you as the opposing No. 2 in the region there is something there. Gonzaga beat some decent teams in a solid non-conference campaign but they failed in the one opportunity for a win that would have legitimized the Bulldogs as an elite squad. They also lost at home to a bubble team with that win being the key reason that BYU wound up making the tournament. It has become impossible to ignore the past March failures for Gonzaga and this year’s team is perhaps unfairly penalized perception-wise for the 2013 team that was handed a controversial No. 1 seed only to struggle to beat the No. 16 seed and then got bounced in the next game.

West Regional - No. 1 Wisconsin: The Badgers were a Final Four team last season and at their best looks the part as a contender this season. Ultimately Virginia’s case to be a No. 1 seed looked stronger however as the Big Ten was down this season and the losses for Wisconsin were worse. Both teams lost at home to Duke and also on the road to a quality team in conference play but the Badgers handed Rutgers one of its two Big Ten wins this season. Frank Kaminsky did not play that day but that doesn’t make it excusable. There were also two overtime wins on the resume and a Big Ten schedule that only featured one meeting each with Maryland, Ohio State, Michigan State, and Michigan for one of the weakest slates in a conference that didn’t match the quality of play of the past few seasons.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
Thursday's Evening Tips
By Brian Edwards

Thursday's Matchups

East Regional - No. 1 Villanova vs. No. 16 Lafayette (TBS, 6:50 p.m. )
Venue: CONSOL Energy Center
Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
Betting Odds: Villanova -23, Total: 145

-- Villanova (32-2 straight up, 24-9 against the spread) earned the No. 1 seed in the East Region after winning the Big East Tournament at Madison Square Garden in New York City by beating Marquette, Providence and Xavier. In the finals this past Saturday, Jay Wright's team cruised to a 69-52 win over Xavier as a 7.5-point favorite. Dylan Ellis led the way with 16 points, six rebounds and three assists, while Josh Hart added 15 points and seven boards.

-- Villanova brings a 15-game winning streak to Pittsburgh. During this surge, the Wildcats have been covering numbers galore with a stellar 13-2 spread record. They haven't tasted defeat since a 78-58 loss at Georgetown on Jan. 19.

-- Villanova has been a double-digit favorite 18 times, compiling an outstanding 13-5 spread record. The Wildcats have taken the cash in seven straight such spots.

-- Lafayette (20-12 SU, 2-2 ATS) is the automatic qualifier out of the Patriot League, winning the conference tournament by virtue of a 65-63 win over American as a four-point 'chalk.' Nick Linder earned Tournament MVP honors by dropping 25 points on the Eagles. Linder averaged 23.7 points per game during Lafayette's three-game run through the Patriot League Tourney.

-- Lafayette is led by forward Dan Trist, who averages 17.6 points and 6.7 rebounds per game while shooting at a 58.0 percent clip. However, he struggled mightily against American when he had just six points and seven rebounds while committing six turnovers. Trist had scored in double figures in the seven previous games while posting four double-doubles.

-- Linder, a sophomore point guard, averages 12.8 PPG and has a 161/56 assists-to-turnovers ratio. He is making 49.4 percent of his shots from the field, 40.0 percent from 3-point range and 85.0 percent at the charity stripe. Linder has scored at least 12 points in 11 straight games and 14 of the last 15.

-- Lafayette has faced three teams in the Tournament field. The Leopards won 77-50 at Robert Morris, but they lost 83-56 at West Virginia and 96-69 at Kansas.

-- Villanova's lone defeats came at Georgetown and at Seton Hall (66-61). The Wildcats are fourth in the RPI Rankings thanks to a spectacular 13-1 record against the Top 50 and an 18-2 mark versus the Top 100.

-- This is the second time in school history that Villanova has garnered a No. 1 seed. In the 2006 Tournament, the top-seeded Wildcats lost to eventual champion Florida in the regional final. They are in the Tournament for the 35th time, seeking their second national title won in 1985 over Georgetown at Rupp Arena in Lexington.

-- The 'under' is 18-14-1 overall for Villanova, cashing in each of its last three contests.

-- These schools in Eastern Pennsylvania are separated by only 67 miles.

Midwest Regional - No. 8 Cincinnati vs. No. 9 Purdue (CBS, 7:10 p.m.)
Venue: KFC Yum! Center
Location: Louisville, KY.
Betting Odds: Purdue -2, Total: 118.5

-- Purdue (21-12 SU, 20-10 ATS) has won 10 of its last 14 games both SU and ATS, but it has failed to cover the spread in three consecutive outings. After beating Penn St. 64-59 as a 5.5-point favorite, the Boilermakers lost 71-51 to Wisconsin as 9.5-point underdogs in the Big Ten Tournament semifinals. Matt Painter's team came out strong against the Badgers, using a 15-2 run to take a 35-30 advantage into intermission. However, Bo Ryan's club responded by scoring the first 10 points of the second and Purdue only scored 16 points in the final 20 minutes. A.J. Hammons had 10 points, seven rebounds and three blocked shots in the losing effort.

-- Hammons is a seven-foot junior center out of Oak Hill (VA.) Academy. He averages team-highs in scoring (11.8 PPG), rebounds (6.5 RPG), field-goal percentage (53.4%) and blocked shots (2.9 BPG). Hammons had 23 points, nine rebounds and four blocked shots in the win over PSU at the Big Ten Tourney.

-- Cincinnati (22-10 SU, 15-13 ATS) saw its five-game winning streak both SU and ATS snapped when it dropped a 57-54 decision to UConn in the AAC Tournament quarterfinals. Troy Caupain had a team-best 12 points against the Huskies. Gary Clark had nine points and 11 rebounds, while Octavius Ellis finished with 11 points and seven boards. Shaquille Thomas added 10 points, seven boards and a pair of blocked shots.

-- Cincy has been an underdog eight times this year, producing a 5-3 spread record with four outright victories. The wins include a pair of scalps over SMU, in addition to victories at N.C. St. and at Tulsa.

-- Purdue has been a single-digit favorite 12 times, posting a 7-5 spread record.

-- This is Purdue's 27th NCAA Tournament appearance but its first since 2012. Cincy is in its 29th Tourney and is looking for its seventh trip to the Final Four. The Bearcats have gone down in the opening round in back-to-back seasons, including a heartbreaker against Harvard last year. The Boilermakers have 14 straight opening-round victories.

-- Even though it lost valuable rim protector Justin Jackson from last year, Cincy still finished sixth in the nation in scoring defense by allowing only 55.3 PPG.

-- This total is tied for the lowest that Purdue has seen all year. When the Boilers played Nebraska at home on Feb. 15, they won 66-54 with the 120 combined points slipping 'over' the 118.5-point tally.

-- The 'under' has connected in six of Cincy's last eight games to improve to 13-11 overall.

-- The 'under' is 18-10 overall for Purdue, cashing in each of its last three outings.

South Regional - No. 5 Utah vs. No. 12 Stephen F. Austin (TruTV, 7:27 p.m.)
Venue: Moda Center at the Rose Quarter
Location: Portland, OR.
Betting Odds: Utah -6.5, Total: 131.5

-- Utah (24-8 SU, 19-11-1 ATS) is back in the NCAA Tournament for the first time since 2009, but we should mention that head coach Larry Krystkowiak led Montana to a pair of appearances in '05 and '06.

-- Utah has lost four of its last seven games and is 2-5 ATS during this span. The Utes lost a 67-64 decision to Oregon as seven-point 'chalk' in the Pac-12 Tournament semifinals. Brandon Taylor had 24 points on 6-of-9 shooting from downtown in the losing effort. Delon Wright finished with 16 points, nine rebounds, five assists and a pair of steals.

-- Stephen F. Austin (29-4 SU, 3-3 ATS) is making its third NCAA Tournament appearance. The Lumberjacks picked up their first Tournament win in school history when they beat VCU 77-75 in overtime last year. They were dismissed by UCLA (77-60) in the Round of 32.

-- SFA is led by Thomas Walkup, who averages team-bests in scoring (15.7 PPG), rebounding (6.4 RPG) and field-goal percentage (57.1%). Walkup is also second on the team in assists (3.7 APG).

-- SFA won the Southland Conference Tournament thanks to an 83-70 win over Sam Houston St. as a six-point favorite in the finals. Walkup was the catalyst with 24 points, eight rebounds, five assists and a pair of steals. Jared Johnson scored 17 points and grabbed five rebounds, while Dallas Cameron added 14 points.

-- SFA is Top 10 in the country in both scoring (79.5 PPG) and field-goal percentage (49.1%).

-- Utah is led by Wright, a first-team All Pac-12 selection who averages 14.9 points, 5.3 assists and 2.1 steals per game. Taylor and Jordan Loveridge are also double-figure scorers who are excellent 3-point shooters. Taylor (10.7 PPG) is draining 43.9 percent of his 3-balls, while Loveridge (10.1 PPG) is stroking treys at a 43.8 percent clip. Taylor has a 106/47 assists-to-turnovers ratio.

-- The 'under' is 15-14-1 overall for the Utes, 6-2 in their last eight games.

-- Totals have been an overall wash (2-2) for SFA.

West Regional - No. 4 North Carolina vs. No. 13 Harvard (TNT, 7:20 p.m. )
Venue: Jacksonville Veterans Memorial Arena
Location: Jacksonville, FL.
Betting Odds: North Carolina -10.5, Total: 133

-- North Carolina (24-11 SU, 19-15-1 ATS) has won five of its last seven games both SU and ATS, inlcuding wins over Virginia and Louisville at the ACC Tournament. The Tar Heels lost a 90-82 decision to Notre Dame this past Saturday night in the ACC Tourney finals in Greensboro. They lost to the Irish as 3.5-point favorites. In defeat, Marcus Paige scored 24 points and dished out five assists. Brice Johnson finished with 20 points on 10-of-12 shooting from the field.

-- UNC captured a 71-67 win over Virginia in the ACC Tourney semifinals thanks to 22 points from Justin Jackson, who hit 8-of-10 shots from the field and 4-of-5 from long distance. Paige had 14 points and five assists compared to just one turnover, while Johnson had 13 points, six rebounds and three assists.

-- UNC is No. 11 in the RPI Rankings, losing only one game (at No. 74 Pittsburgh) to a team outside of the Top 50. The Tar Heels are 11-11 against the Top 100. They have nine wins over teams in the field, including scalps of Davidson, UCLA and Ohio St. on neutral courts. In addition, Roy Williams's team won at N.C. St. and beat Louisville in Chapel Hill.

-- Harvard (22-7 SU, 9-14 ATS) is back in the NCAA Tournament for the fourth consecutive season after beating Yale 53-51 as a 2.5-point road favorite at The Palestra in Philadelphia. The Crimson got a 15-foot jumper from Steve Moundou-Missi with 7.2 seconds left to untie the one-game playoff for the Ivy League's automatic bid. Both schools finished the regular season with 11-3 conference records. The Ivy is the NCAA's only league that doesn't have a conference tournament. Wesley Saunders scored a game-high 22 points to pace Tommy Amaker's squad. Moundou-Missi finished with 11 points and nine rebounds.

-- Saunders became Harvard's fourth-leading scorer in school history in the critical win over Yale, surpassing Los Angeles Lakers guard Jeremy Lin. Saunders averages team-highs in scoring (16.3 PPG), assists (4.2 APG) and steals (1.8 SPG).

-- Harvard has been an underdog only three times this season, compiling a 1-2 record both SU and ATS. The Crimson won outright as a 1.5-point road underdog at Yale on Feb. 7. They lost by 10 at Arizona St. as 2.5-point puppies and took a 76-27 pounding at Virginia as 11.5-point 'dogs.

-- Harvard is No. 52 in the RPI Rankings, posing four wins over Top-100 foes. Amaker's club beat UMass (80) and Northeastern (85) at home, in addition to the two aforementioned wins over Yale (63).

-- The 'under' is 12-6 overall for Harvard, 6-2 in its last eight games. This is the highest total the Crimson has seen this year. The previous high was 129 in a 72-62 Harvard win against Brown that saw the 134 combined points slip 'over' the number.

-- The 'over' is 19-13-1 overall for UNC, but the 'under' is 5-3 in its last eight outings.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
NCAAB Consensus Picks

The NCAA tournament looks like Kentucky’s to lose, as the Wildcats are six wins away from a perfect 40-0 season. To no one’s surprise, many handicappers predicted John Calipari’s squad to cut down the nets in Indianapolis, while all but one of the 17 cappers polled had the Wildcats advancing to the Final Four.

We pretty much know all the strengths of Kentucky, from their depth to incredible length. But what about the other teams that have a shot at a national title? Cappers gave their thoughts on some of the other top squads in the country and who they think can give UK a run for its money during March Madness.

Notre Dame captured the ACC tournament title and are definitely a threat in the East region, according to Joe Nelson. “The tournament track record for the Irish is quite poor and they are more likely to be a first round upset victim than a Final four team, but the Irish are one of the best shooting teams in the nation and in Jerian Grant they have a player that can take over games. It will be a very tough path to even get to the regional final for the Irish, but if the 3-point shots are falling they would have a shot to outscore a Kentucky offense that is used to winning with its defense,” says Nelson.

A team that can make some waves is Michigan State, who in spite of losing in the Big 10 championship to Wisconsin, is definitely a squad to keep an eye on, says James Manos. “My sleeper team is Michigan State as I have them in the Final Four as a #7 seed. The Spartans are peaking at the right time, have a great history of playing well in the tourney due to their style of play (gritty, physical) and the methods employed by Tom Izzo. They have the motivation of feeling they got beat by the referees in their Big 10 Championship game loss to Wisconsin and with guard play being of import in the early rounds, they've been getting great guard play. Their seeding is beneficial as they got the weakest #2 in Virginia.”

What about another #1 seed named Wildcats? Jim Feist believes Jay Wright’s Villanova squad can do some damage this March, “Teams that can spread the floor and bomb away from long range can be dangerous and tough to match up against this time of the year. Villanova is one of those, 23rd in the nation in scoring, 13th in assists with no defeats since mid-January.”

Wisconsin needs to get through Kentucky prior to the National Championship, but Antony Dinero is high on the Badgers winning it all, “The Badgers have the look of a team of destiny. With guard Traevon Jackson due back and Bronson Koenig having gained so much experience filling in for him, Bo Ryan now has three veteran guards to complement a superb frontcourt when you include Josh Gasser. Ryan will find a way to play the perfect game against Kentucky and finish the job by overcoming Virginia in a final that people will undoubtedly complain about due to a slower pace.”

Here are the Final Four picks from some handicappers:


Final Four and Championship Predictions

Handicapper Sleeper East South Midwest West Champion

Alex Smith VCU Virginia Duke Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Andy Iskoe Maryland Villanova Iowa State Kentucky Arizona Kentucky

Antony Dinero Utah Virginia Iowa State Kentucky Wisconsin Wisconsin

Bill Marzano N.C. State Villanova Duke Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Bruce Marshall N.C. State Oklahoma Duke Notre Dame Arizona Notre Dame

Chip Chirimbes Notre Dame Virginia Gonzaga Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Greg Smith Utah Virginia Gonzaga Kentucky Wisconsin Virginia

James Manos Michigan State Michigan State Gonzaga Kentucky Arizona Gonzaga

Jim Feist Northern Iowa Villanova Iowa State Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Jimmy Boyd Michigan State Virginia Gonzaga Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Joe Nelson Notre Dame Virginia Duke Kentucky Arizona Kentucky

Joe Williams Wofford Virginia Duke Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Kevin Rogers SMU Villanova Gonzaga Kentucky Arizona Kentucky

Kyle Hunter Northern Iowa Virginia Gonzaga Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

Marc Lawrence Northern Iowa Northern Iowa Gonzaga Kentucky Arizona Arizona

Stephen Nover Wichita State Virginia Gonzaga Kentucky Wisconsin Kentucky

The SportsBoss Baylor Villanova Duke Kentucky Arizona Villanova
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
See spot. See spot bet: This week's best spot bet opportunities
By BEN BURNS

Spot bets are classic handicapping practices that have proven profitable no matter what sport you're betting. Whether it's a team looking past this week's opponent, one coming off a hard-fought victory, or a rough patch of schedule, bettors can find value picking their spots. Ben Burns points out his favorites:

Letdown spot

The Wyoming Cowboys aren’t supposed to be dancing this March but an upset run in the Mountain West Conference tournament burst plenty of bubbles and has Wyoming sitting as an always dangerous No. 12 seed, taking on No. 5 Northern Iowa in the Round of 64. While the 12-over-5 upset produced three stunners last March, bettors may be safe with the higher seed in this matchup.

The Cowboys run the risk of a massive letdown in their tournament opener. We’ve seen teams come off surprise runs in their conference tournament and get crushed in the NCAA, thanks to a sense of accomplishment and just being “happy” to be here. Oddsmakers opened Wyoming as a 7-point underdog and that line has been trimmed to +6, with the market reacting to previous No. 12 shockers.

Lookahead spot

The New Orleans Pelicans are currently eighth in the Western Conference, just barely edging the Oklahoma City Thunder for the final postseason spot. New Orleans has a huge week with road games at Golden State and Los Angeles, but before then must travel to Phoenix to face the Suns Thursday night.

The Pelicans are three and a half games up on the Suns in the West standings and could get caught looking ahead to the Warriors and Clippers. New Orleans has lost four of its last five games versus Phoenix, most recently beating the Suns 110-106 at home in December. The home team has covered in each of the past four meetings between these Western rivals.

Schedule spot

The Rhode Island Rams knocked off the Iona Gaels in the opening round of the NIT Tuesday night, winning 88-75 as 7-point home favorites. But they don’t have much time to celebrate that victory, and will be busy packing for a cross-country trip to play Stanford in the second round Friday.

Rhode Island travels to Palo Alto with a 7-4 SU and 5-6 ATS record on the road. Not only will the Rams have to deal with a long flight from coast to coast but also battle the clock in California, which is three-hour time difference. There was a chance that this game could have been played at the Ryan Center, since Stanford is hosting women’s tournament games. However, organizers have found a time slot – since TBA - which will come at night.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
NCAAB

Thursday's NCAA games

Notre Dame maxed-out last week winning ACC tourney, its first tourney win; they were solid sleeper choice for Final Four until they got put into Kentucky's region. Fighting Irish are diverse on offense, pass it real well, shoot 39.2% (#17) from arc and have best eFG% in country, but they've also lost in first round of NCAAs three of last four years; last time they made Sweet 16 was 2003. Northeastern drilled 12-20 from arc in winning CAA title game ten days ago; Huskies are 1-2 vs top 100 teams; best win is over #50 Richmond. CAA teams lost in first round last two years by 21-15 points.

UAB won C-USA tournament because it was played in Birmingham and refs wouldn't let them lose semi-final game vs #1 seed La Tech (FTs that game were 32-7). Blazers are 7th-youngest team in America- at one point this year, they were 4-9-- they lost last four games away from home- last road win was Jan 31. UAB turns ball over 20.4 of time, but their coach is Kansas alum and Jayhawks are Iowa State's nemesis. Cyclones won their second straight Big X tournament, but they've been falling behind and then making huge second half runs.

Georgia State's Harrow (hamstring) is a ?? for this game; their coach tore his achilles tendon after they won conference tourney Sunday-- that had to hurt team's prep for this. Panthers lost by 23 at Iowa State Nov 17, its only game vs Big X team this year- they force turnovers 22.8% of time, #16 in country. Sun Belt teams are 1-6 vs spread in last seven tourney games; last Sun Belt win in non-play-in game was Western Kentucky in '09. Baylor is my sleeper pick to make Final Four; #3 seeds are 10-6 vs spread in first round games last four years.

Texas Southern is coached by Mike Davis, who led Indiana to Final Four in 2002; his Tigers played one home game before Jan 17- they were 6-10 playing money grab games all over America, but they beat Michigan State in OT, and won at Kansas State- they have collection of transfers from all over, some of whom have had multiple chances. Arizona expects to get to Final Four; are 5-0 vs teams ranked outside top 200, with all five wins by 18+ points- they're 2-4 vs spread in last six first round games. Since '07, SWAC teams are 2-4 against the spread in non-play-in games.

Texas turns ball over 20% of time, is 4th-worst team forcing turnovers in country; Longhorns split last four first round games, with all four games decided by six or less points. Texas went 3-5 in last eight games, finished T6 in Big X (best league in country)- -they were 11-2 out of conference. Butler lost by 13 to Oklahoma of Big X on neutral court in November. Big East teams were 2-4 SU in tourney LY, first year after teams shuffled conferences. Favorites are 9-2-1 in 6-11 games last three years- over last six years, 1st round faves of less than 5 points are 26-53-1 vs number.

UCLA is most controversial choice in this field; SMU was controversial omission from LY's tourney. Bruins won last four first round games, but those were different players- UCLA was a #1 or 2 seed in three of those years, a 6-seed LY. Bruins lost six of last eight games away from home; they're #314 experienced team in country. SMU is 24-3 in last 27 games, with two losses to Cincinnati, a great defensive team- UCLA isn't great on defense. Mustangs are #81 team in experience and have Larry Brown on bench, who won this tourney last time he was in it, though that was 27 years ago.

Ole Miss went nuts in second half Tuesday, scoring 62 points in beating BYU 94-90; Cougars went 15-29 on arc and lost. Rebels have very short turnaround, playing afternoon game- they're 2-4 in last six games, but Ole Miss came as close to anyone to beating Kentucky this year, losing 89-86 in OT at Rupp. Rebels beat Creighton of Big East in November. Kennedy used to coach at Cincinnati, so he is familar with a Xavier team that lost in double OT at Auburn in December (also beat Alabama by 13). Xavier split its last six games; four of their last five wins were by 2 or less or in overtime- they started season 10-3, they're 11-10 in last 21 games.

VCU won A-14 tourney Sunday afternoon, now has Thursday afternoon game 2,900 miles away, tough scheduling spot. Rams won A-14 tourney despite losing PG Weber for season Jan 31- they're better offensive team with Lewis at PG, not as good a pressing team. Rams went 32-72 (44%) from arc in last three games in Brooklyn last week. Ohio State went 4-4 in last eight games; an ESPN sideline reporter (former athlete) said he had severe doubts about Buckeyes' team chemistry after listening to huddles during a game. OSU holds team to 31.8% from arc. Over last six years, underdogs are 16-7-1 vs spread in 7-10 games.

Lafayette coach O'Hanlon went to Villanova; his team was 9-9 in Patriot League before winning conference tourney - they're #2 (41.4%) team in country shooting 3-pointers. Leopards lost at West Virginia by 27, lost at Kansas by 27, lost by 22 at Yale in only three games vs top 100 teams. Villanova is 2-5 vs spread in last seven first round games; they won by 7 over Bucknell in only game vs Patriot team this year. Wildcats probably spent time prepping for second round game (NC State/LSU); they've won last 15 games in row after winning first Big East tourney title in 20 years. Villanova is #27 team in country defending the arc.

Cincinnati lost to Creighton/Harvard in first round last two years; they've won five of last six games overall,. losing to UConn in Hartford last week in AAC tourney. Bearcats have an interim coach (Cronin took ill during season, is an advisor) are #258 experience team but have #19 defensive eFG% in country. Purdue is #311 in experience, is in tournament for first time in three years; Boilers are 2-3 in last five games, turning the ball over 20% of time for season- they were only 8-5 in pre-conference games. Over last eight years, underdogs are 22-10 vs spread in 8-9 games.

Random odd stat: 4-13 game in West has seen the underdog go 12-2-1 vs spread last 15 years, with five SU upsets. Harvard is in tourney for 4th year in row; they won first round game last two years but this team isn't quite as good as those- they lost 76-27 to Virginia, lost at Arizona State by 10 in only two non-conference top 100 games. North Carolina is 4-2 vs spread in last six first round games, winning all six- they've won six of last eight games overall. Ivy teams usually have extra week to prepare for this, but Harvard had to win playoff game Saturday, so they're on same short prep time as Tar Heels. Amaker is a Duke alum, by the way.

Over last 12 years, Southland Conference teams have been single digit dog twice in first round; they won both games ('06/'14), their only two first round wins over that time. SF Austin upset VCU LY for one of the wins; Lumberjacks are 29-4 this year, 61-7 last two years- they're also 1-3 vs top 100 non-league teams, losing by 2-18-16 points in November. Over last five years, underdogs are 17-7 vs spread in 5-12 games. Utah is 3-4 in its last seven games; they're #227 in experience. SFA forces turnovers on 24.3% of possessions (#5 in country).

LSU is in tourney for first time since '09; Tigers lost by 3 to Clemson in only game vs SEC team this year. LSU is #13 in experience but has #21 defensive eFG%. NC State star Barber was banged-up last weekend, is expected to go here as former Alabama coach Gottfried faces an SEC foe in LSU that is 4-2 in last six games but got upset by Auburn in first SEC tourney game a week ago. Wolfpack won four of its last five first round games; they're 6-2 in last eight games overall, 10-4 outside ACC. Again, over last eight years, underdogs are 22-10 vs spread in 8-9 games.

Hampton had nice win over Manhattan Tuesday, turning ball over only 14 times vs Jaspers' press, getting to foul line 34 times- they're playing with house money vs powerful Kentucky team that has its eyes farther down road, as they chase history. Hampton lost at Iowa by 34, Syracuse by 18, Illinois by 18; they turn ball over 20.6% of time which will be a problem. Over last three tournaments, #1 seeds are 4-8 vs spread in first round. Hampton is #79 experienced team in country; Knetucky is 7th youngest team, so at least Pirates have one edge in this game.

12-seed Wofford is highest seed SoCon team has had since Davidson got to Elite 8 as 10-seed with Steph Curry in '08; Terriers won at NC State in December, but lost by 15 at Stanford, 33 at West Virginia, 29 at Duke. Wofford is 0-3 in NCAAs (2-1 vs spread) losing by 4-8-17 points- they lost 57-40 to Michigan in first round LY. Arkansas is in tourney for first time since '08; they force turnovers 22.6% of time, #20 in country. Hogs played Sunday; Wofford hasn't played in 10 days, which is edge for them in this case. Over last five years, dogs are 17-7 vs spread in 5-12 games.

Eastern Washington's coach told Jim Rome on air his team was going to beat Georgetown in this game. His Eagles won conference tourney game on Montana's home court, they won 88-86 at Indiana, lost at SMU by 9, so they're capable,, but Big Sky teams lost last nine tourney games (2-7 vs spread), so there's a gap there somewhere. Georgetown's tournament history is awful, losing three of first four first round games, losing twice as a 13-point favorite. Hoyas' last four games were all decided by six or less points. 4-seeds are 8-4 vs spread in first round last three years.

First of all, nobody in these next three tournaments wants to be here; they all want to be in the NCAAs. Once teams win a game or two, it'll get better, but it is impossible to know who is motivated in the first round. Crowds will be smaller, teams don't travel first class in these events.

NIT games


CBI games


CIT tournament

Northwestern State always plays fast, plays lot of guys and they're good on offense, with #42 eFG%, #22 in fewest turnovers. Demons are 11-3 in last 14 games, but their 5-6 non-conference record is a joke, since four of five wins were non-D1 wins. Tennessee-Martin went 10-6 in OVC but lost three of last four games; Skyhawks have UNLV transfer Smith who came with coach Schroyer; they're #32 team shooting 3's (38.2%).
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
205,324
Tokens
'Let's Dance!'

The 2015 'Big Dance' gets underway Thursday. History is clear, no number-one seed has ever lost to a number-sixteen seed (120-0). It will happen eventually, maybe even this year, but it's unlikely. Sporting a 48-0 record since 2003 but with point-spreads close to twenty or higher the norm for top-seeds in the round of 64, things were not as rosy against the betting line as #1's posted a 24-23-1 ATS mark including 16-20-1 ATS laying 20 or more over the 12 year span. Last year only Wichita State (-16.5) covered with Arizona (-19.5), Florida (-21.5), Virginia (-19.5) all dropping the loot. Looking at the three most recent NCAA Tournaments, top-seeds during their first 'Big Dance' were 4-7-1 ATS winning by an average of 15.6 points/game. However, those laying 20 or more points were a cash draining 1-4-1 against the betting line. This year's group all expected to tip-off near or above 20 it's safe to say Kentucky (-34), Villanova (-23.5), Wisconsin (-19.5), Duke (-20+) are in dangerous betting territory.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,518
Members
100,876
Latest member
phanmemchatdakenhupviral
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com