Dude, that's ridiculous. Any Over/under prop bet where the player or situation was available to happen, but didn't happen, is graded as a win or loss. If longest FG is over/under 45 yards, and no FG's are attempted, UNDER is the winner. It's not a Push because no FG's were attempted. Same with Sacks, etc. If you have a Draft prop of a Player A being drafted ahead of Player B, and Player A is drafted #10, player B isn't drafted, it's not a Push because Player B wasn't drafted. The guy won his bet. The Only possible out is if the bet had the provision that the player needed to be drafted. I have never seen any such provision in this type of bet, and no place I've found has such a rule. It's clear when they offer a draft # Over/Under, that if the player isn't drafted, over wins. If they had a Prop, will Payton be drafted, Yes or No, then the book would be right.
My book told me tough luck. It's no action since he was not drafted. My reasoning was not heard. Emails ignored. My phone inquries were met with similar results. Was told I could have a text convo with the book's tough talking GM that made the decision on it being a "no action" but I figured at that point it could only get uglier for me.
clearer is always better,,
However, lol all of you saying he was cheated, you guys are in the wrong,, and you know it,, the play was no action,,
BETALL is there some way we could bet an official statement from HERITAGE that says both over and under pushed? then this argument is over??
