The wide open AFC

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2020
Messages
3,529
Tokens
And you have the Steelers biting nails with the tie factor. This is so great.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
420
Tokens
I wonder what Goodell would have said if the raiders would have taken a knee instead of kicking the field goal. They could have said screw you Pitt welcome to the playoffs chargers.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,564
Tokens
It would've been defensible at that point from an ethics/competitive nature standpoint. Don't think it would've been a big deal.

Be easier to do something like that on the road where the fans paying for overpriced food and $300-500 lower level tickets aren't your own though.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
22,098
Tokens
Interesting as the Titans beat the Chiefs and Bills who are on this list as 2 of the top 3 KC still remains the favorite
I mean.... not surprising when QBs rule the day and Tannehill is not a big name QB

Kansas City Chiefs+200
559016Tennessee Titans+300
559002Buffalo Bills+350
559013New England Patriots+750
559003Cincinnati Bengals+950
559010Las Vegas Raiders+1800
559015Pittsburgh Steelers+2800
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,564
Tokens
Obviously Chiefs ran pure to get Pitt rd 1, Pitt is probably not a top 10 team in the conference

Talking difference of being -250 vs LAC vs -600 or more vs Pitt
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,783
Tokens
The Raiders didn’t want a tie

They would’ve been the 7th seed and forced to go to Arrowhead and play a team that owns them. Now they get a much more manageable game against cincy
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,564
Tokens
In the situation that presented itself they didn't want a tie. But there could've been a point in the game where a tie would be better than risking winning/losing. And at that point, late late in OT it wouldn't have been a big deal to play for the tie.

Also, that little wrinkle drove a ton of interest in that game. It was the talk of the league how they could play in a tie, a novel nuance that hasn't happened before and then it actually ended up mattering, almost like it was scripted (uh oh, conspiracy theory alert) So I'm sure Goodell/league offices/network partners were fine with it. Can't believe how many times I heard about the tie angle all weekend.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
29,030
Tokens
Hard to say the Raiders weren't playing for a tie , when they weren't using their TO's or showing much urgency to even get into FG range. Chargers sloppy play was the sole reason trying for the win even became a option.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,783
Tokens
I think they wanted to win, but wanted to win without risking a loss -- if that makes sense. So they wanted to burn down the clock, see if they get closer, and then try a long field goal for the win -- they have a great kicker too. Tie would have been a disappointing but acceptable outcome

Only risk there is blocked FG TD. If he misses it, then oh well
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
48,639
Tokens
Every team wants the win. Especially knocking out a Div rival had to be sweet for the home fans.

I think they were going to kick the fg if they thought their guy could make it. They sure didn't hesitate when thery got that third down run. A 47 yarder is no gimme.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,783
Tokens
Said that Week 17 match-up in Cincy was the AFC title game

Bam

This is what it should be
 

my clock is stuck on 420 time to hit this bong
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,431
Tokens
I don’t see how cinnci wins at arrowhead. There a good young team with a great rising quarterback. Kc lost that game in cinnci I believe they return to Super Bowl . A Mobil M and company gonna be too much to overcome . Maybe they cover the 7 but Kc should return to the show for 3rd year in a row and maybe there last run. Buffalo had them and couldn’t ,healthy maholmes and company the difference in winning and losing. In another shootout you have to take the chiefs experience over the over performing bengals . They were gifted last week and I’m sure all the money will pour in on the chiefs so I will play bengals and over but I give them about a 15% chance of winning waiting to see if line moves above 7 I think it might
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
22,098
Tokens
I don’t see how cinnci wins at arrowhead. There a good young team with a great rising quarterback. Kc lost that game in cinnci I believe they return to Super Bowl . A Mobil M and company gonna be too much to overcome . Maybe they cover the 7 but Kc should return to the show for 3rd year in a row and maybe there last run. Buffalo had them and couldn’t ,healthy maholmes and company the difference in winning and losing. In another shootout you have to take the chiefs experience over the over performing bengals . They were gifted last week and I’m sure all the money will pour in on the chiefs so I will play bengals and over but I give them about a 15% chance of winning waiting to see if line moves above 7 I think it might
Yeah
Bad spot for Kc to cover imo
But Championship games faves do often come in

Like both dogs
One to win outright and one to cover
Probably will not play either though
 

my clock is stuck on 420 time to hit this bong
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,431
Tokens
Yeah
Bad spot for Kc to cover imo
But Championship games faves do often come in

Like both dogs
One to win outright and one to cover
Probably will not play either though
I did 2 preseason bets on superbowl for 300 a pop Kc +400 and tennesse is toast so will hedge small and take points on cinnci. Hoping for 7.5
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,870
Messages
13,560,702
Members
100,700
Latest member
877cashnow!
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com