I didn't ask anybody anything in my initial post. I certainly wouldn't ask you anything. I posted the info because it's relevant but let's talk about UCONN's reasoning for canceling the season. This is what their statement says:
"The safety challenges created by COVID-19 place our football student-athletes at an unacceptable level of risk."
"The necessary measures needed to mitigate risk of football student-athletes contracting the coronavirus are not conducive to delivering an optimal experience for our team,"
So, essentially, the NBA, MLB, NHL, UFC, European Soccer and all other Division I programs can do this but UCONN can't? Do you see why this is a stupid decision? Not to mention there is next to 0% risk for anyone under 65. Now, instead of insults, counter this argument with some facts not feeling.
Guarantee you the school still relies heavily on that football program revenue. And for the kids on scholarship in their Senior years?
They could do what Notre Dame did and attach itself to a conference for a year.
You do understand what I am saying right? As stated earlier in post #3. see the info below.
Enfuego makes his decisions to do what is best for Enfuego. UConn makes a decision that is best for UConn. So what's the problem?
definitely WuFlu related...has nothing to do with their athletic dept being the most highly subsidized school in the country losing >$40M yr with football being the largest deficit contributor.
notre dame has an NBC contract and a national following
Uconn football has Willie (no offense)
HUGE difference
Guarantee you the school still relies heavily on that football program revenue. And for the kids on scholarship in their Senior years?
I read home games are normally filled at a 25% capacity. Is that true?
Dude, I didn't compare the two programs. Come on now.
I said UCONN can DO what Notre Dame is doing and attach itself to a conference for one year.
You're deflecting like always. There is no scientific reason 120+ other football teams can play and UCONN can't. If you can name one, have at it or deflect as standard practice.
See...I'll make it easy and simple for you. Some scientists say if you wear a mask, it's a safe thing to do. Some scientists thinks the mask does nothing. So you make that decision yourself. UConn have made the decision to not play this season. Enfuego want to know why they are not playing. Uconn to Enfuego, go fvck yourself and run your own fvcking house while we run ours. Drive around!
Was the team making money or losing money? That should be the determining factor. The football team brought in $32 million in revenue (according to Wall Street Journal), but the school spent $44 million from its budget on the athletic program (money spent above revenue, according to USA Today).
Now lets see all the socialists at therxforum who believe in throwing as much money as possible at public education come ignore the wastefulness that is UConn athletics. They think the only things that should matter are the chances that the players will live or die. I bet they'll just say "What about the kids? What happens to them?".
football revenue was 3.3M last year, expenses were nearly 17M ... even with "saving" this 14M loss the athletic dept is expecting a 25M loss. easier to blame covid than the failings of the AD, school, and lack of success of their programs. and they know the media will run with "uconn cancels football due to virus" and overlook the financials behind thisand the basketball money drying up, until now that is, hoops money beginning to reverse itself