The U.S. did more damage to Iraq in 2 months than Saddam would do if he lived to 1000

grantt · Jul 11, 2003

Hansen you retard what does this have to do with the original post. You need to open the trailer windows once in awhile.

hansenbros. · Jul 11, 2003

grantt is still a dumbf---!

first Iraq, then France

grantt · Jul 11, 2003

And you're fat and dumb, but hey that's the American way.

Phaedrus · Jul 11, 2003

hansen -- glad you took it in the somewhat amusing context in which it was intended.

Would love to hear your "PROPER conservative ideology" course some time, given that most of the neocon lapdogs here that call themselves "conservative" seem to have no grasp on the cornerstones of conservative ideology, and never miss an opportunity to call me a liberal despite the fact that I am more conservative than any Republican president since Eisenhower. I make Reagan look like a hippie flower-child.

Phaedrus

chonce · Jul 12, 2003

Hanson,

I didnt call myself a conservative either. I am opposed to the nature of Bi-partisan politics, and feel it is one of the more pressing flaws in our current system of government. Its not always black and white. Both parties accomplish little good, in my opinion. I agree with some conservative ideology. I am very much on the right when discussing re-allocation of wealth.)

Anyways, you are a conceded one Hanson. I am not afraid to take you on in a debate.

hansenbros. · Jul 14, 2003

choncey

i see some validity in your comments. however, i think bipartisan politics are a necessary evil: for the checks and balances, if nothing else.

first Iraq, then France

hansenbros. · Jul 14, 2003

phaedrus

i'm a basic supply-sider, strong disciplinarian, old-fashioned values with a touch of libertarianism.

the liberal gives the starving "person" salmon, while the conservative teaches the starving "man" to fish.

GL.

first Iraq, then France